Subject: COMPARISON STUDY OF HRD AND SLOSH MODEL SURFACE WINDS IN RECENT HURRICANES
Principal Investigator:
Samuel H. Houston
Collaborating scientist(s):
Dr. Wilson A. Shaffer (NOAA/NWS/TDL)
Dr. Mark D. Powell (NOAA/AOML/HRD)
Dr. Jye Chen (NOAA/NWS/TDL)
Objective: To compare the Hurricane Research Division's (HRD)
surface wind fields in recent hurricanes with the input fields for
the Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) model and
develop methods for incorporating the HRD winds into the SLOSH
model.
Rationale: HRD has developed new methods to produce surface winds
fields in tropical cyclones based on all available surface wind
observations, including reconnaissance aircraft flight-level
observations adjusted to the surface. HRD and the National Weather
Service' s (NWS) Techniques Development Laboratory (TDL) evaluated
the parametric wind model used as input to the SLOSH model through
comparisons with HRD's surface wind fields in recent hurricanes
(Houston et al. 1995, 1996). Previously, the SLOSH model was tested
for hurricane landfalls along the U.S. coastlines and calculated
storm surge heights were found to have an accuracy of +/- 20% when
the hurricane is adequately described.
Method: The HRD surface wind analyses in hurricanes are based on
all available surface wind observations from buoys, Coastal-Marine
Automated Network (C-MAN) platforms, ships, and surface facilities.
Because these types of data are often sparse near tropical cyclones,
especially over the ocean, reconnaissance aircraft flight-level
observations near the storm are used to supplement the in situ
surface measurements after adjustment to the surface with a
planetary boundary layer model. All of the observations in the data
set are adjusted to conform to a common framework for exposure
(oceanic or open-terrain over-land), height (10 m), and averaging
time (10 min average for comparison with SLOSH model winds). The
values input to the SLOSH parametric model are the tropical
cyclone's position (either observed or forecast), size, and
intensity. Using these input parameters, SLOSH computes a wind field
which is the primary forcing mechanism for the oceanographic
processes.
Accomplishment: Comparisons of HRD and SLOSH wind fields for
several recent hurricanes were conducted for this study (Figure 1).
One example of these comparisons was for Hurricane Emily (1993) in
which the peak HRD wind speeds (Figure 2) were nearly the same
strength on the west and east sides of the northward moving storm
during its closest approach to North Carolina. This resulted in
higher than forecast storm surge near Hatteras, North Carolina
caused by strong winds across Pamlico Sound. The SLOSH model
isotachs for Emily (Figure 3) indicate that the storm's peak winds
were weaker and the strongest winds were mainly to the right of the
storm unlike the HRD surface winds. More recently, Hurricane Opal
(1995) struck the Florida Panhandle and caused considerable property
damage (estimated property losses range from $2 to 3 billion). Most
of the damage associated with Opal occurred along the immediate
coast where the storm surge and hurricane generated waves had the
greatest impact. Opal's wind field at landfall (Figure 4), indicated
that rapid weakening had occurred following the hurricanes peak
intensity from approximately 10 hours earlier (not shown) when the
the storm was estimated to be a Category 4 hurricane on the
Saffir-Simpson scale. The SLOSH parametric wind field at landfall
(Figure 5) shows slightly stronger winds than the HRD wind fields.
The peak storm surge values computed by the SLOSH model were in
close agreement with the observed storm surge. However, because the
storm had been much stronger over the Gulf of Mexico a few hours
prior to landfall, hurricane generated waves caused much higher wave
runup along the shoreline (the SLOSH model does not include waves
or wave set up in its storm surge calculations). Hurricanes such as
Andrew of 1992 (Powell and Houston 1996), Bob of 1991, and Opal
(Powell and Houston 1997) showed small differences between the SLOSH
and HRD peak winds at landfall in areas impacted by significant
storm surge (the differences between the observed and SLOSH computed
storm surge values were also small). These differences were within
the expected range of errors associated with the wind observations
and the assimilation techniques used in the HRD wind analysis
procedures. However, in the case of Emily, the SLOSH model could not
capture the stronger winds to the left of the storm's track. This
may have resulted in an underestimate of the forecast storm surge on
the Pamlico Sound side of the North Carolina Outer Banks near
Hatteras. Methods are currently being developed to incorporate HRD
winds into the SLOSH model and this may prove useful for improving
storm surge forecasts.
Key references:
Houston, S. H., and M. D. Powell, 1994: Observed and modeled water
level response from Tropical Storm Marco (1990). Wea. Forecasting,
9, 427-439.
Houston, S. H., W. A. Shaffer, M. D. Powell, and J. Chen, 1995:
Comparisons of SLOSH parametric and HRD analyzed surface wind fields
in recent hurricanes. A.M.S. 21st Conf. on Hur. and Trop. Met.,
24-28 Apr. 1995, Miami FL, 619-621.
Houston, S. H., W. A. Shaffer, M. D. Powell, and J. Chen, 1996:
Incorporating HRD surface wind fields into the SLOSH model. A.M.S.
Conf. on Coastal Ocean. and Atmos. Pred., 29 Jan. - 2 Feb. 1996,
Atlanta, GA, 265-267.
Powell, M. D., and S. H. Houston, 1996: Hurricane Andrew's landfall
in south Florida. Part II: Surface wind fields and potential
real-time applications. Weather and Forecasting, 11, 329-349.
Powell, M. D., and S. H. Houston, 1997: Surface wind fields of 1995
hurricanes Erin, Opal, Luis, Marilyn, and Roxanne at landfall. Mon.
Wea. Rev., (In press).
Project Overview page