Physical Science Team Meeting Minutes
November 2, 2000
NOAA/AOML/OCD
Participants (See Appendix B)
I.
April
Science Conference:
Peter Ortner opened the meeting with a
discussion of the format of the April 26, 2001, Science Conference so that
everyone clearly understood the central role to be played by the individual
research teams. This included synthesis
presentation, delivery of a draft synthesis document to the PMC well prior to
the Science Conference, poster presentation, and participation in a question
and answer period with the Science Oversight Panel.
A.
Latest
Developments
Tom Lee began a roundtable discussion of new
results and future research plans.
Together, RSMAS and AOML have completed three years of moored
observations on the southwest shelf and Keys coastal zone with excellent data
recovery, including such events as tidal, wind forcing, transient storms and
interannual variations caused by El Nino. Analysis is underway to present
results of the 3-year current/T/C/P measurements at the April Science
Conference. Future plans involve real-time monitoring on the southwest shelf
and Keys and seasonal process studies of exchange processes in the inner basins
of Florida Bay to directly address the concerns expressed by the Florida Bay
Science Oversight Panel.
Bill Nuttle presented reprints of a recent paper
on salinity variability in Florida Bay using the Fathom box model. He is also
briefly described a new project to estimate evaporation rates and radiation
budgets in Florida Bay using an isotopic approach and two met towers to
evaluate spatial variability.
Libby Johns discussed ongoing analysis of
salinity variability observed in the regional ship surveys and the inner basin
Florida Bay surveys with regard to large changes observed from recent hurricane
influences.
Doug Wilson described ongoing analysis of moored
conductivity measurements in the Shark River plume and planned drifter studies
for the seasonal inner basin studies.
Sandy Vargo reviewed the status of eight
real-time C-MAN monitoring stations located along the Keys and in western
Florida Bay. Four of these stations are
now equipped with water level recorders and transmissometers i.e., Long Key,
Sombrero, Northwest Florida Bay, and Sands Key. All stations have in water T
and C measurements.
DeWitt Smith reported that he and Mike Robblee
are compiling all the available salinity data that will, in turn, be
incorporated into the Florida Bay Standard Data Set. DeWitt is also working on
the influences of Hurricanes Irene and Harvey and a tidal analysis of sea level
along the western coast of the Ten Thousand Islands.
Frank Marshall mentioned that he is working on
transfer functions using multiple regression that can be used for salinity
performance measures. He uses water levels from flow control structures and
regresses with salinity observed in the bays along the northern boundary of
Florida Bay. He is able to reproduce historical results but when longer time
periods are used the regression coefficients decrease.
John Wang reported that he has completed two
modeling scenarios for South Biscayne Bay circulation and salinity distribution
using different fresh water discharges. He has also quantified the exchange
between offshore currents and the shelf region off Biscayne Bay using OSCR data.
Zafer Top gave a presentation on recent work
using helium and tritium analysis of water samples from an array of stations in
Florida Bay to estimate ground water input to Florida Bay. He found significant excesses of He in
stations along the northern boundary and interprets this as due to groundwater
input at a rate of 2 to 4 and up to 16 cm/day. Members of the PST pointed out
that this did not match either estimates of residence times or observed
seasonal salinity patterns. A groundwater input of 1 cm/day would require a
volume flow of 230 m3/sec, which was not felt to be physically
reasonable. The cause of the discrepancy between these groundwater flow
estimates and salinity observations was not clear. PST members agreed to
investigate the implications to model dynamics and calculated residence times,
salinities and transports of groundwater inputs of this scale. If Zafer supplied the salinity of the
groundwater, the mass-balance FATHOM modelers agreed to determine the degree to
which that amount of input could be accommodated without disrupting the
observed salinity distribution which was reasonably well reproduced by FATHOM
without any groundwater input.
Zaki Moustafa reported on the progress of his
pilot project applying a hydrodynamic model to Florida Bay that was originally
developed at Virginia Institute of Marine Science and is in the public domain.
The western boundary is at 810 05¢ and uses the USACE’s ADCP data as a boundary
condition. The model is “3D”, has 4330 cells, and is spatially coarse compared
to the RMA-10. So far, he has primarily
been occupied by data gathering, but the model is up and running. The model
provides currents and salinity distributions and could be used to evaluate
different freshwater discharge scenarios with short run times, i.e. rapid
turnaround. The model is expected to be ready in early 2001. A full report with documentation will be
provided the entire PST two weeks prior to a meeting devoted to a substantive
review. The SFWMD has made no
commitment to subsequent development of this model pending the PST review.
B. Develop
Outline for Question 1 Synthesis (Draft Synthesis due February 15, 2001)
Question
1: How, and at what rates, do storms, changing freshwater flows, sea level
rise, and local evaporation/precipitation patterns influence circulation and
salinity patterns within Florida Bay and outflows from the Bay to adjacent
waters?
1) List of Research Themes related to
Question 1
2) Map of Measurement Locations
3) Event Time Line (showing when
measurements are made)
4) Discussion of Research Themes
What has been learned
Importance to Question 1
Unanswered questions
5) Ongoing Research
Map showing future
measurement strategies
Relation to Question 1
6) Future Needs
C. Assignment of Responsibilities for Synthesis Report and
Presentation
Research Themes
1) Fresh Water Inflows (surface and
groundwater flows into Florida Bay)
Responsibility of Frank
Marshall and Eric Swain(?)
8 Abstracts: Cable et al.
Hittle
Marshall
Schaffranek
et al.
Swain
and Langevin
Swart
and Price
Vosburg
et al.
Wolfert
et al.
Top
et al.
Additional
abstract solicited from Patino
2) Salinity Variability (spatial and
temporal variability within Florida Bay and connecting
Regions)
Responsibility of Elizabeth
Johns and DeWitt Smith
6 Abstracts: Cronin et al.
Johns
et al.
Smith
et al.
Johns
et al.
Robblee
et al.
Wardlaw
3) Circulation and Exchange (spatial and
temporal circulation patterns, transports,
exchanges between the
Gulf, Florida Bay and the Atlantic)
Responsibility of Tom Lee and
Ned Smith
3 Abstracts: Lee et al.
Pitts
Smith
4) Atmospheric Forcing (winds, evaporation,
and precipitation)
Responsibility of Rene Price
and Bill Nuttle
1 Abstract: Price et al
(evaporation)
Additional abstracts
solicited from Mattocks, Trimble, and Willis
5) Modeling (Florida Bay circulation and
salinity, atmospheric forcing, boundary conditions from large-scale shelf
model, hydrologic inflow models, and Standard Data Set)
Responsibility of Peter Ortner
and Tom Lee with advice from Frank Aikman
3 Abstracts: Schaffranek et al. (freshwater
inflows)
Swain
and Langevin (freshwater inflows)
Wolfert
et al. (freshwater inflows)
Abstract
to be submitted by Moustafa
6) General Use Maps and Time Lines
Responsibility of Joe Pica
Responsibilities
of Synthesis Organizers
·
Review
abstracts related to theme
·
Contact
abstract authors for additional information
·
List
and summarize abstracts as related to theme
·
Synthesize
the following for each theme:
a) What has been learned?
b) Importance to Question 1
c) Unanswered questions
d) Ongoing Work
e) Future needs
Synthesis Presentation
Responsibility: Tom
Lee
II.
Modeling
Needs with Regard to Question 1
A.
Review
of Status/”Feasibility Study” Time Clock
Peter Ortner led a discussion of the Florida Bay
and Florida Keys Feasibility Study. There is an urgent need to investigate the
influence of proposed water delivery scenarios to the Everglades on salinity
variability in Florida Bay South Florida coastal systems. The USACE is no
longer involved in the effort with their RMA10 hydrodynamic model. Funding for
the Feasibility Study is available at about $1M/yr for 4 years. The time clock
for needed input is two years from October 2000. The Feasibility Study outcome
will determine what, if any, additional restoration actions (as yet
uncontemplated in CERP) must be taken in regard to Florida Bay and the Florida
Keys. Additional funding may be available from the DOI’s Critical Ecosystems
Studies Initiative (CESI) for modeling studies that can yield improved
predictions of salinity changes under different water delivery scenarios. This
objective implies more than just modeling salinity variation within Florida Bay
but also requires much improved assessment of the distribution and quantity of
freshwater inflows under the different scenarios.
B.
Discussion
of Terms of Reference
Peter Ortner presented a draft of Circulation
Modeling Terms of Reference for discussion. Comments from the PST were:
1) Terms of reference provide too much leeway, most models could
claim to satisfy these
seven items.
2) Need to be more specific about physical processes to model,
methods to be used and
standards to use to validate the
results.
3) Modelers should work closely with the team of investigators that
are actively engaged
in physical process studies within Florida
Bay.
Members of the PST (T.Lee, B.Nuttle, J.Wang, Z.
Moustafa, and F.Aikman[?]) agreed to help improve the Terms of Reference (new
version attached as Appendix C). Not all their input has, as yet, been received
and incorporated.
III.
Standard
Data Set for Florida Bay
Bill Nuttle reviewed the results from the
Standard Data Set Workshop Report which was provided to participants prior to
the PST meeting.
A.
Workshop
Summary
The Standard Data Set covers the six-year period
from October 1994 to October 2000. This time period was chosen due to the large
concentration of measurements. The Standard Data Set is made up of three broad
types of data: 1) salinity, 2) estimates of freshwater fluxes, and 3)
oceanographic and climate data. The data set will be 1) used to validate
models, 2) as a common point of reference for studies of wet and dry seasons,
and 3) to characterize links between Everglades hydraulics and salinity
variability in Florida Bay.
B. Project
status
Joe Pica will continue to request data from
investigators. Some data sets are
still being processed by the source
agency.
Flat files will
be made available on a web page. Station
metadata will be entered into an Geographical Information System that is set up
for queries.
1) Oceanographic (tides, currents, CTD
profiles, T/S continuous surveys)
2) Climate (rainfall, air temperature, dew
point [humidity], wind speed and direction, solar
radiation, pan
evaporation)
3) Water Quality (salinity, water
temperature)
B.
Completion
Strategy
Joe will continue to request data from
investigators. Some data sets still being processed. Initially, flat files will be provided. Eventually, however, data will be entered into an Oracle database
that is set up for queries.
IV.
Salinity
Performance Measures for Florida Bay
Bill Nuttle presented results from a July
13, 2000, meeting on salinity performance measures.
A. Present
Measures
The current performance measure consists of a
linear regression based on water levels at P33 and salinity in northern coastal
bays of Florida Bay. This regression
has been used by water management since Tabb (1967) first found a regression
coefficient of about -0.8 using a relatively short data record. Recent studies
by Frank Marshall have been able to recreate the Tabb relationship but, using
longer data records, found much reduced regression coefficients. The P33
regression does not appear to be reliable due to influences from water
management that can cause large error bars.
Discussion related to the fact that the high correlation with the well
was likely to be caused by covariance with precipitation.
C.
Future
Plans
Studies are underway to use more robust
techniques to relate Everglades hydrology and water management to total flow
into Florida Bay which is, in turn, required to predict salinity variability in
Florida Bay. Discussion focused upon
explicit representation of fresh water runoff including consideration of the
Buttonwood Embankment using more appropriate rainfall measurements (Royal Palm
rather than Flamingo in some cases) and more complex statistical methods
incorporating high frequency daily flow data rather than long-term
averages. There was also discussion of
a more general long-term strategy. It
was generally agreed that inflow improvement and local salinity variability
e.g., Joe Bay or Little Madeira, might best be addressed by a rigorous
statistical approach. However, predicting salinity variability over the entire
Bay (not to mention understanding advective pathways) will require a relatively
sophisticated hydrodynamic model.
Moreover, development and verification of the hydrodynamic model will
require timely completion of the Standard Data Set project. The consensus was
that all three activities (improved statistical predictors, hydrodynamic
modeling, and the Florida Bay Standard Data Set) will have to be simultaneously
pursued to meet the timelines and requirements of CERP and the Feasibility
Study. Funding should be made available
to do this from one or a combination of the Feasibility Study partners,
available DOI/CESI funds or other PMC agency sources.