Historical hydrographic data was used to compute the mean upper layer thickness and reduced gravity in the South Atlantic. These parameters along with TOPEX/POSEIDON (T/P) sea height anomaly (SHA) are used to derive the upper layer thickness of the ocean. This product was used to identify and track anticyclonic (warm) rings in the region.
The upper layer and ring dynamics can be studied using the common
two layer representation of the vertical structure of the ocean.
The upper layer thickness, which goes from the surface to the depth of
the thermocline (10C) can be estimated using altimeter-derived sea
height anomalies (Goni et al, 1996):
Figure 1 shows
(a) the mean upper layer thickness from historical
hydrographic data, (b) A, the inverse of the reduced gravity and
(c) the reduced gravity.
During August 1997 near real time T/P SHA data
was used to identify several anticyclonic rings in the region.
The upper panel of
figure 2
shows the SHA corresponding to August 26, 1997.
The positive anomalies are associated with anticyclonic circulation.
The alternation of positive and negative values at 38S between
15 and 25W is due to the oscillation of the Agulhas Retroflection
and shedding of rings. The lower panel of
figure 2
shows the upper
layer thickness derived using (1). Several anticyclonic rings,
identified by their larger upper layer thickness, can be detected
in the Agulhas ring corridor.
In September 1997, as part of the
Benguela Current Experiment, a
cruise on the R/V Seward Johnson guided by the maps shown in figure 2
identified and surveyed three rings.
In figure 3 the crusie track from this experiment is
overlain on figure 2.
The upper layer thickness map corresponding to September 16, 1997, is
shown in figure 4. The cruise tracks (blue line), hydrography-derived
depth of the 10C isotherm (red contours), altimeter groundtracks
(dots), and bathymetry (black contours) are superimposed in the figure.
The altimeter-derived locations of the rings are remarkably similar
to those found using hydrographic data. The maximum values
of upper layer thickness are approximately 10% smaller in the
altimeter-derived field. This might be due because the altimeter
did not sample the rings through their center, or because of
attenuation of the sea height anomaly signal due to the T/P 10
day smapling period. Similar upper layer thickness maps are constructed every day and used
to track these three rings back in time. Figure
5 is a plot of the tracks each of these three rings took
from shedding through the fall of 1997.
(1)
is the mean upper layer thickness,
is the upper layer thickness anomaly,