1935 Storm #1 – 2012 Addition

27736 05/15/1935 M= 5  1 SNBR= 613 NOT NAMED   XING=0 SSS=0
27737 05/15*170 685  30    0*175 690  30    0*182 695  30 1006*192 699  30    0
27738 05/16*203 702  30    0*215 704  30    0*225 705  35    0*232 702  35    0
27739 05/17*238 695  40    0*244 685  40    0*250 673  45    0*256 658  50    0
27739 05/18*263 635  50    0*273 610  45    0*285 590  40    0*297 570  35    0
27739 05/19E310 550  30    0*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0
27739 TS 

This is a new tropical storm not previously recorded in HURDAT. Evidence for this 
system comes from the Historical Weather Map series, the COADS ship database and 
the Monthly Weather Review.

May 15: An area of low pressure resides over the eastern portion of Hispaniola 
(18.5N, 69.5W) with pressure of at most 1010 mb from HWM. Available observations 
from HWM and COADS indicate the storm system is barotropic. 
Ship highlights: 5 kt NE and 1006 mb at 18N, 69.5W at 12 UTC (HWM).

May 16: HWM indicates an approaching frontal system from the northwest. The system 
is presently a tropical storm with evidence from HWM and COADS of a low of at 
most 1010 mb near 22.5N, 70.5W. "And on the 17th a whole gale was met a considerable 
distance south of Bermuda. The low with which this latter gale was connected was 
noted near Haiti on the 16th" (MWR). No gale force winds (or equivalent in pressure) 
were observed.

May 17: The approaching cold front continues to interact with the tropical storm 
causing it to move toward the northeast. HWM and COADS indicate the tropical storm 
is near 25N, 67.3W. "...on the 17th a whole gale was met a considerable distance 
south of Bermuda." Ship highlights: 20 kt NE and 1003 mb at 26N, 68.4W at 12 UTC (COA).

May 18: HWM indicates that no closed low was present and that a moderate cold front 
was approaching the area where the tropical cyclone was previously. 
Ship highlights: 50 kt S and 1003 mb at 26.3N, 63W at 00 UTC (MWR).

May 19: HWM suggests that the system has been absorbed by a frontal boundary.  
From COADS and MWR, however, observations suggest that the center was near 
28.5N, 59W. No gale force winds (or equivalent in pressure) were observed.

Genesis for this tropical system began on the early May 15th where evidence shows 
a closed circulation. It appears that the system acquired tropical storm status at 
12 UTC on the 15th. A central pressure of 1006 mb at 12 UTC on the 15th suggests 
maximum winds of 35 kt from the Brown et al. south of 25N pressure-wind relationship.   
As the cyclone was moving slowly at this point in time, 30 kt is chosen for HURDAT.  
Intensification to a tropical storm is estimated to have occurred around 12 UTC on 
the 16th.  Peak observations were 50 kt and 1003 mb late on the 17th and early on 
the 18th as evident from the Dutch ship Magdala (MWR). 1003 mb peripheral pressure 
would suggest at least 41 kt from the south of 25N pressure –wind relationship. 
Thus 50 kt is chosen for HURDAT based on both observed winds and pressure. 
Dissipation occurred after 00Z on the 19th as the system became absorbed by a 
frontal boundary.


Storm 2 (originally 1), 1935

26610 08/18/1935 M= 9  1 SNBR= 587 NOT NAMED   XING=0 SSS=0
27740 08/18/1935 M=11  2 SNBR= 614 NOT NAMED   XING=0 SSS=0
                   **  *  

(The 16th and 17th are new to HURDAT.)
26615 08/16*  0   0   0    0*109 560  25    0*115 570  25    0*122 580  25    0*
26615 08/17*131 589  25    0*140 597  25    0*150 605  25    0*161 612  30    0*

26615 08/18*  0   0   0    0*195 590  65    0*202 608  70    0*206 618  75    0*
27745 08/18*173 618  35    0*185 624  40    0*195 630  45    0*203 637  55    0
                             *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***  **             

26620 08/19*210 627  75    0*214 634  80    0*218 641  80    0*222 648  85    0*
27750 08/19*209 645  65    0*214 653  70    0*218 660  75    0*222 667  80    0
            *** ***  **          ***  **          ***  **          ***  **     

26625 08/20*226 655  90    0*232 663  90    0*238 670  95    0*243 675  95    0*
27755 08/20*225 671  85    0*228 674  90    0*232 675  95    0*239 676 100    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***          *** ***          *** ***  **     

26630 08/21*247 678  95    0*251 681 100    0*256 684 100    0*265 687 100    0*
27760 08/21*249 677 105    0*262 678 115    0*273 680 115    0*281 682 115    0
            *** *** ***      *** *** ***      *** *** ***      *** *** ***     

26635 08/22*276 690 100    0*285 690 105    0*294 688 105    0*305 684 105    0*
27765 08/22*287 683 115    0*291 684 110    0*294 685 110    0*300 684 110    0
            *** *** ***      *** *** ***          *** ***      ***     ***     

26640 08/23*316 678 105    0*321 673 105    0*328 666 100    0*340 648 100    0*
27770 08/23*308 680 110    0*317 674 105    0*328 666 100    0*340 650 100    0
            *** *** ***      *** *** ***                           ***        

26645 08/24*352 628  95    0*361 610  90    0*373 593  85    0*397 576  80    0*
27775 08/24*352 630 100    0*361 610 100    0*373 590 100    0*397 576  95    0
                *** ***              ***          *** ***               **     

26650 08/25E426 567  75    0E452 570  70    0E473 577  65    0E484 584  55    0*
27780 08/25*426 567  85    0*452 570  75    0E473 577  70    0E484 584  60    0
           *         **     *         **               **               **     

26655 08/26E489 591  50    0E493 598  40    0E497 605  35    0E499 620  30    0*
27785 08/26E489 592  50    0E493 602  40    0E497 615  35    0E499 630  30    0
                ***              ***              ***              ***          
26660 HR

Major changes to both the track and the intensity shown in McAdie et al. (2009), 
originally storm number 1.  Another major change is to begin genesis two days 
earlier than originally indicated.  Evidence for these alterations comes from 
the Historical Weather Maps series, the COADS ship database, individual ship and 
station data from NCDC, and Monthly Weather Review.

August 16:  HWM analyzed no features of interest on this date.  HURDAT had not 
yet begun this system on this date.  No gales or low pressures on this date.  

August 17:  HWM analyzed no features of interest on this date.  HURDAT had not 
yet begun this system on this date.  No gales or low pressures on this date.

August 18: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1010 mb near 19N, 61W. HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 1 hurricane at 20.2N, 60.8W at 12 UTC. The MWR Tracks 
of Cyclones indicate the center near 21N, 61W at 8 a.m. Available observations 
from HWM and COADS suggests a center near 19.5N, 62W. Ship highlights: 35 kt NE 
at ~12 UTC at 22N, 65W (MWR). Regarding the intensity, "The American tanker 
California Standard made the first definite contact with the developing storm 
center on the morning of the 18th, when a northeast gale was encountered near 
22N, 65W" (MWR).

August 19: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 22N, 66W. HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 1 hurricane at 21.8N, 64.1W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones 
indicate the center near 22N, 65W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest that 
a position close to HWM is most accurate. Ship highlights: 60 kt NE and 1001 mb 
at 22.3N, 64W at 01Z (MWR); 50 kt SE and 1011 mb at 22.3N, 64W at 12 UTC (COA).

August 20: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 23N, 68W. HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 2 hurricane at 23.8N, 67W at 12 UTC. The MWR Tracks 
of Cyclones indicate the center near 24N, 66W at 8 a.m. Available observations 
suggest that a position slightly southwest of HURDAT is most accurate. 
Ship highlights: 35 kt ESE and 1006 mb at 24N, 66.7W (HWM).

August 21: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 995 mb near 26N, 69W. HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 3 hurricane at 25.6N, 68.4W at 12 UTC. The MWR Tracks 
of Cyclones indicate a pressure of 955 mb centered near 26N, 68W at 8 a.m. 
Available observations suggest the center north of HURDAT is most accurate. 
Ship highlights: 70 kt N and 955 mb at 26.9N, 68.5W at 09 UTC (MWR); 45 kt W 
and 986 mb at 27N, 67W at 12 UTC (COA). Regarding the intensity, "...the 
American steamship Angelina passed very close to the center about 5 a.m. of 
the 21st near 27N, 68.5W where a barometer reading of 955 mb was observed, 
attended by hurricane winds shifting from the northeast through west to 
southwest, without a lull" (MWR).

August 22: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 995 mb near 29.5N, 68.5W. 
HURDAT listed this as a Category 3 hurricane at 29.4N, 68.8W. The MWR Tracks 
of Cyclones indicate the center near 29N, 69W at 8 a.m. Available observations 
suggest the HURDAT location is most accurate. Ship Highlights: 60 kt W and 
994 mb at 27.3N, 71.7W at 04 UTC (MWR); 35 kt S and 1010 mb at 28.3N, 66W 
at 12 UTC (COA).

August 23: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 985 mb near 32.5N, 67W. 
HURDAT listed this as a Category 3 hurricane at 32.8N, 66.6W. The MWR Tracks 
of Cyclones indicate the center near 33N, 67W at 8 a.m. Available observations 
indicate that the HURDAT position is most accurate. Station highlights: 
35 kt S and 1005 mb at Bermuda at 12 UTC (HWM). Ship highlights: 45 kt SSW 
and 1013 mb at 28.5N, 65.5W at 04 UTC (COA); 35 WSW and 1009 mb at 29.3N, 
65.6 W at 12 UTC (COA).

August 24: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 975 mb near 37N, 59.5W. 
HURDAT listed this as a Category 2 hurricane at 37.3N, 59.3W. The MWR 
Tracks of Cyclones indicate a pressure of 972 mb centered near 36N, 59W 
at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest the HURDAT position to be most 
accurate. Ship highlights: 70 kt S and 972 mb at 36.5N, 59.5W at 09 UTC 
(MWR); 70 kt WNW and 956 mb at 41.4N, 57W at 21 UTC (MWR). "The British 
steamer York City encountered the central region about 400 miles northeast 
of Bermuda, and there for 24 hours experienced storm conditions culminating 
about 5 a.m. in a south-to-west hurricane that lasted 4 hours causing 
considerable damage to the life boats and superstructure of the ship. The 
barometer fell to 973 mb at 36.5N, 59.5W at its lowest point as the winds 
changed from south-southeast through southwest to northwest" (MWR).

August 25: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 995 mb near 46N, 57.5W. 
HURDAT listed this as an extratropical storm centered near 47.3N, 57.7W. 
The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicate a pressure of 996 mb centered near 
47N, 56W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest the HURDAT position to 
be most accurate. Ship highlights: 35 kt NE and 977 mb at 45.4N, 58.2W at 
03 UTC (MWR); 35 kt SW and 1000 mb at 46N, 53.2W at 12 UTC (HWM).

August 26: HWM indicates a large extratropical storm centered near 50N, 
60W with a cold front extending to the southeast. HURDAT listed this as 
an extratropical storm centered near 29.4N, 68.8W. 
Ship highlight: 25 kt SE and 1001 mb at 51N, 60W at 12 UTC (HWM).

Genesis is begun early on the 16th of August, as a well-defined 
circulation was present east of the Lesser Antilles on that date as 
shown by ship and island observations.  This is two days earlier than 
originally indicated.  A large track change was introduced at 06 and 
12 UTC on the 18th.  The remainder of the lifetime of the cyclone had 
minor position alterations introduced.  Observations suggest that the 
system began as a tropical depression and gradually intensified into 
a tropical storm around 00 UTC on the 18th.  Numerous observations on 
the 18th indicate that the system was not as intense as shown in 
HURDAT; the intensity is reduced to 45 kt at 12 UTC down from 70 kt 
originally.  Major intensity reductions (at least a 20 kt change) are 
made from 06 to 18 UTC on the 18th.  A 60 kt NE ship observation with 
1001 mb pressure at 01 UTC on the 19th does support the cyclone 
becoming a hurricane by 00 UTC of the 19th, a 12 hour delay to 
hurricane intensity from originally listed in HURDAT.  Intensity 
reduced 10 kt at 00 and 06 UTC and by 5 kt at 12 and 18 UTC on the 
19th, though further reductions in intensity are not justifiable 
given the limited inner cord observations.   955 mb peripheral 
pressure with hurricane force winds on the 21st suggests maximum 
winds of at least 106 kt from the Brown et al. south of 25N 
pressure-wind relationship. 115 kt is chosen for the reanalysis and 
is the peak intensity of this system (up from 105 kt originally).  
A ship reported 70 kt WNW winds with 956 mb pressure at 21 UTC on 
the 24th.  This suggests maximum winds of at least 93 kt from the 
Landsea et al. north of 35N pressure-wind relationship.  
Additionally, the hurricane was moving around 30 kt on the 24th 
and 25th.  On the other hand, the system was near 42N at the time 
of the ship observation and extratropical transition had begun.  
Thus intensity is analyzed to be 95 kt at 18 UTC on the 24th and 
85 kt at 00 UTC on the 25th.  HURDAT originally suggests weakening 
began on the 24th with a quick transition to extratropical by 00 UTC 
of the 25th. Available observations indicate that the structure of 
the cyclone at 12 UTC on the 24th was still fairly symmetric and two 
ships 200 nm north of the cyclone reported 79F air temperatures.  
Substantial weakening instead began on the 25th with the transition 
to extratropical around 12 UTC of the 25th.  The cyclone became absorbed 
before 00 UTC on the 27th of August by a larger extratropical low that 
moved eastward across Canada.  There is no evidence that the system had 
a separate closed low at 12 UTC on the 27th. 


Storm 3 (originally 2), 1935

26665 08/29/1935 M=13  2 SNBR= 588 NOT NAMED   XING=1 SSS=5
27795 08/29/1935 M=13  3 SNBR= 615 NOT NAMED   XING=1 SSS=5
                       *

26670 08/29*  0   0   0    0*242 683  35    0*242 693  35    0*242 698  35    0*
27800 08/29*  0   0   0    0*233 688  25    0*235 693  25    0*238 698  25    0
                             *** ***  **      ***      **      ***      **

26675 08/30*242 704  35    0*242 709  40    0*242 714  40    0*241 720  45    0*
27805 08/30*241 704  30    0*242 709  30    0*242 714  30    0*241 721  30    0
                     **               **               **          ***  **

26680 08/31*241 726  45    0*240 730  50    0*239 735  55    0*238 743  55    0*
27810 08/31*241 729  35    0*240 737  35    0*239 745  40    0*238 752  45    0
                     **          ***  **          ***  **          ***  **

26685 09/01*237 753  60    0*236 763  60    0*237 773  65    0*238 781  75    0*
27815 09/01*237 759  50    0*237 766  55    0*237 773  65    0*237 779  75    0
                     **      *** ***  **                       *** *** 

26690 09/02*239 786  90    0*240 790 105    0*242 793 120    0*243 797 130    0*
27820 09/02*237 785  90    0*237 790 105    0*238 795 120    0*241 800 135    0
                             ***              *** ***          *** *** ***  

26695 09/03*245 801 140  892*249 808 130    0*252 813 115    0*261 823 100    0*
27825 09/03*246 805 160  892*251 811 160    0*257 816 145    0*264 822 130    0
            *** *** ***      *** *** ***      *** *** ***      *** *** ***

26700 09/04*271 830  95    0*279 834  85    0*287 835  80    0*295 835  75    0*
27830 09/04*271 828 115    0*278 832 105    0*284 834  95    0*291 834  85    0
                *** ***      *** *** ***      *** ***  **      *** *** ***  

26705 09/05*305 832  60    0*317 827  60    0*330 817  55    0*341 805  55    0*
27835 09/05*299 834  75    0*309 831  65    0*320 825  55    0*332 815  50    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***          *** ***  **

26710 09/06*352 791  55    0*361 772  60    0*370 751  65    0*383 709  75    0*
27840 09/06*346 800  45    0*361 780  50  996*375 751  65    0*387 709  75    0
            *** ***  **          ***  **  *** ***              *** 

26715 09/07*397 654  80    0E408 602  80    0E420 550  80    0E433 498  75    0*
27845 09/07E398 654  80    0E409 602  80    0E420 550  80    0E431 500  75    0
           ****              ***                               *** *** 

26720 09/08E448 447  75    0E466 396  70    0E485 363  65    0E493 351  60    0*
27850 09/08E442 450  75    0E455 400  75    0E469 352  75    0E485 327  75    0
            *** ***          *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***  **

26725 09/09E500 342  60    0E521 321  55    0E540 312  50    0E550 311  45    0*
27855 09/09E502 315  70    0E520 312  70    0E540 312  70    0E555 320  65    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **               **      *** ***  ** 
 
26730 09/10E560 321  40    0E570 335  35    0E580 360  35    0*  0   0   0    0*
27860 09/10E565 340  60    0E568 365  55    0E570 390  50    0*  0   0   0    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***  **   

26735 HRBFL5AFL2
27865 HRCFL5BFL5AFL2IGA1
      **********    ****

U.S. Hurricane Landfalls
3rd/02 UTC  24.8N 80.8W  5 nm RMW  892 mb  160 kt  CFL5, BFL5
4th/22 UTC  29.6N 83.4W  20 nm RMW  965 mb  85 kt  AFL2

Minor changes to the track (while it was a tropical cyclone) and major changes to 
the intensity shown in McAdie et al. (2009), originally storm number 2. Evidence 
for these alterations comes from the Historical Weather Maps series, the COADS ship 
database, Monthly Weather Review, Climatological Data (Florida, Georgia, South 
Carolina, North Carolina and Virginia), Barnes (1998), Dunn and Miller (1960), 
Ho et al (1987), Jarrell et al (1992), Schwerdt et al (1979), and Vickery et al (2000).

August 29: HWM analysed a trough along 70W. HURDAT listed this as a tropical storm 
at 24.2N, 69.3W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicate the center near 24.5N, 68W at 
8 a.m. Available observations suggests a position south of HURDAT is most accurate. 
No gale force winds (or equivalent in pressure) were observed.

August 30: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1010 mb near 22.5N, 72.5W. HURDAT 
listed this as a tropical storm at 24.2N, 71.4W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones 
indicate the center near 24.5N, 71W at 8 a.m. Available observations indicate the 
HURDAT location to be most accurate. No gale force winds (or equivalent in pressure) 
were observed.  “Indications of this disastrous storm first appeared on our weather 
map on August 30, 1935, as a weak circulation, with no strong winds, but occasional 
squalls” (Florida Climatological Data).

August 31: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 24N, 73.5W. HURDAT 
listed this as a tropical storm at 23.9N, 73.5W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones 
indicate the center near 24N, 74W at 8 a.m. Available observations indicate a 
position west of HURDAT to be most accurate. No gale force winds (or equivalent 
in pressure) were observed. "...but it was not until August 31 that a definite 
depression appeared, near Long Island in the southeastern Bahamas, and deepened 
rapidly as it moved westward" (MWR).

September 1: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1000 mb near 22N, 77.5W. HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 1 hurricane at 23.7N, 77.3W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones 
indicate the center near 23.5N, 77W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest the 
HURDAT location to be most accurate. Ship highlights: 50 kt S and 1005 mb at 22.9N, 
74.5W at 00 UTC (MWR). "Hurricane intensity was doubtless reached by the developing 
disturbance near the south end of Andros Island on September 1" (MWR).  “During the 
afternoon and night of the 31st and morning of September 1st, the disturbance moved 
through the Bahamas…Press reports from the Bahamas indicated that no damage occurred 
there, although later there was one report of some damage on the extreme southern 
end of Andros Island.  There is no doubt that the storm was not of hurricane 
intensity at the time it crossed the islands” (Florida Climatological Data).

September 2: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1000 mb near 23N, 80W. HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 4 hurricane at 24.2N, 79.3W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones 
indicates a pressure of 914 mb inches near 24N, 79W at 8 a.m. Available observations 
suggest a position south of HURDAT to be most accurate. Station highlights: 70 kt N 
and 950 mb at Long Key at 22 UTC (MWR); 70 kt NW and 945 mbat Long Key at 2245 UTC 
(MWR). Ship highlights: 5 kt variable and 924 mb at ~25N, ~80.5W at 21 UTC (MWR); 
50 kt NW and 996 mb at 24.4N, 80.9W at 22 UTC (MWR).  Miami observed minimal winds 
for this hurricane, "Northeast to southeast gales occurred during the day, in 
connection with a tropical disturbance passing through the Florida Keys; the maximum 
velocity was 40 mph from the southeast at 11:51 p.m." (OMR).  Regarding the track, 
"The vortex was at the stage of maximum violence, though still of small diameter, as 
it crossed the Florida Keys between Key West and Miami, September 2, moving 
northwestward" (MWR).  “The exact path of the storm between Long Island [Bahamas] 
and the Florida Keys cannot be plotted definitively.  It seems probable that the 
storm moved westward or even west-southwestward for some distance and then began a 
very gradual recurve.  The disturbance probably reached hurricane intensity as it 
passed south of Andros Island.  The hurricane approached the Florida Keys during 
the afternoon of the 2nd and winds of hurricane force began about 5 p. m. at 
Alligator Reef and somewhat later at the keys to the westward.  The area of hurricane 
winds was only about 30 miles in diameter, but this hurricane was probably the most 
intense of record over a small area to visit any portion of the United States” 
(Florida Climatological Data).

September 3: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 995 mb near 24.5N, 81.5W. HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 4 hurricane at 25.2N, 81.3W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones 
indicates a pressure around 914 mb near 26.5N, 82W at 8 a.m. Available observations 
suggest a position slightly northwest of HURDAT to be most accurate. Station highlights: 
calm winds and 899 mb at Upper Matecumbe Key at ~00 UTC (MWR); calm winds and 
892 mb at Craig Key at ~00 UTC (MWR); extreme hurricane force winds SSW and 26.98 in. 
[914 mb] at Long Key at 0215 UTC (MWR). Ship highlights: 920 mb at Molasses Reef at 
~02 UTC (MWR); 50 kt SSW and 997 mb at 24.4N, 81.3W at 07 UTC (MWR); 45 kt NNW and 
998 mb at 27.5N, 80.5W at 13 UTC (COA). With regards to landfall, "...at Long Key 
the barometer was read throughout the passage of the storm by Mr. J.E. Duane, a 
cooperative observer for the Weather Bureau. 9:20 p.m.: Barometer 922 mb, wind 
abated but no flat calm. Lull lasted 55 minutes, 10:10 p.m.: Barometer now 915 mb. 
10:15: The first blast from SSW, full force. The barometer now read 914 mb" (MWR). 
"Southeast gales, shifting to south, continued throughout the day in connection 
with the hurricane passing through the Florida Keys. Minor damage to awnings, 
fruit trees and shrubbery, etc. The maximum velocity for a five minute was 41 mph 
from the southeast at 9:07 a.m." (Miami OMR). The Keys experienced an extreme 
hurricane with a barometer reading of 892 mb and winds in excess of 200 mph (Dunn 
and Miller). "On the night of the 2nd-3rd a severe hurricane of small diameter 
passed northeast of the station, with the center about 50 miles distant...highest 
wind was but 46 mph and there was no damage of consequence in this vicinity" 
(Key West OMR). Regarding intensity at landfall, "Captain Olson's boat weathered 
the storm by being fastened on the north side of the railroad embankment at Craig, 
near the north end of Long Key. The ships barometer was tested in Washington and 
showed it to be exceptionally responsive and reliable. It recorded a low pressure 
of 892 mb near 00 UTC" (MWR). "This adjusted reading [892 mb] set a new record as 
the lowest pressure ever measured in the Western Hemisphere..." (Barnes). Landfall 
position is noted in Ho et al at 24.8N, 80.8W with 892 mb central pressure and 
6 nautical mile radius of maximum winds. Estimated maximum sustained surface winds 
were 151 kt from Schwerdt et al. Regarding the storm tide at Islamorada (8:35 p.m.), 
"Best estimates suggest that the tide was eighteen to twenty feet above normal," 
and, "...the [railroad] track was turned on its side like a fence and ten train 
cars were swept sideways almost 100 feet" (Barnes).  “A corrected barometer reading 
of 26.98 [914 mb] was recorded Long Key, and 26.75 [906 mb] on Lignumvita Key.  
The reading of 26.75 was more than half an inch lower than any previous pressure 
record in this country and one of the lowest in the entire world.  A pressure fall 
of 1.16 inches [39 mb] in 30 minutes was noted at Alligator Reef.  Winds of 150 to 
200 miles per hour undoubtedly occurred with gusts probably exceeding 200 miles 
per hour.  The storm was accompanied by phenomenally high tides at and subsequent 
to the passage of the storm center.  The track and crossties were washed off a 
concrete railroad viaduct, 30 feet above ordinary water level.  The center of the 
hurricane passed over Long Key and Lower Matecumbe Key about 10 p. m. September 2nd, 
with a lull or calm of 55 minutes, and stars were visible.  After crossing the keys, 
the hurricane continued its gradual recurve, paralleling the west Florida coastline 
about 30 to 50 miles offshore.  It was now apparently increasing in area, while its 
central intensity was slightly decreasing” (Florida Climatological Data).

September 4: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 990 mb near 28N, 83.5W. HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 1 hurricane at 28.7N, 83.5W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones 
indicates a pressure around 948 mb near 29N, 84.5W at 8 a.m. Available observations 
suggest a position near HURDAT to be most accurate. Station highlights: 980 mb at 
Egmont Key at 03 UTC (MWR); 985 mb at Cedar Key at 1750 UTC (MWR).  Ship highlights: 
70 kt SE and 979 mb at 27.6N, 82.7W at 03 UTC (MWR). "At Cedar Keys, three lives were 
lost and considerable damages were reported to docks, fishing vessels, and structures 
near the shore, the worst flooding since 1896" (Barnes). "Tampa winds were clocked 
at 75 mph, the barometer dropped to 29.31, tides were 5.3 feet above normal, and over 
7.3 inches of rain fell" (Barnes). "Very few roofs escaped at least minor damage. 
Many were blown off entirely and others damaged badly. Trees, citrus, overhead wiring, 
and other properties were damaged considerably or destroyed" (Tampa OMR). “Sep 4, 
Central Pressure 960 mb based upon 980 mb observation at Egmont Key, 10 kt forward 
speed, 21 nm RMW, landfall position at 29.9N 83.7W” (Ho et al).  “The storm moved 
northward, passed west of Cedar Keys at 1:50 p. m. of the 4th…The storm passed inland 
over Taylor and Dixie counties late in the afternoon of the 4th still attended by 
hurricane winds” (Florida Climatological Data).

September 5: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 995 mb near 28N, 83.5W. HURDAT 
listed this as a tropical storm at 33N, 81.7W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicates 
a pressure of 992 mb near 33N, 82W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest a 
position southwest of HURDAT to be most accurate. Station highlights: 15 kt N and 
993 mb at Augusta at 18 UTC (OMR); 993 mb (min P) at Columbia at 2040 UTC (OMR); 
42 kt S (max wind) and 997 mb (min pressure) at Savannah (no time available) 
(South Carolina Climatological Data); 41 kt S (max wind) and 1001 mb (min pressure) 
at Wilmington (no time available) (South Carolina Climatological Data); 40 kt S 
(max wind) and 999 mb (min pressure) (no time available) at Charleston (South Carolina 
Climatological Data). Ship highlights: 70 kt SE and 1001 mb at ~30.5N, ~80.7W at 
07 UTC (MWR); 15 kt N and 1004 mb at 33.5N, 84.3W at 12 UTC (HWM). Regarding the 
track across the southeast United States, "During September 5 the storm moved from 
Georgia across the Carolinas, attended by high winds and heavy rains that caused 
some damage to property and crops, especially in southern Georgia" (MWR). "Throughout 
sections of Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina minor hurricane conditions 
were experienced and 4 tornadoes were reported" (Dunn and Miller).  “…and then moved 
on through Madison County [FL] to Georgia, and moved northeastward through the 
Carolinas during the next two [5th and 6th] days, accompanied by heavy rains 
generally, and tornadoes in some localities” (Florida Climatological Data).  
"Besides heavy rains the storm caused high winds on the 5th reaching a maximum 
of 49 mph from the south at 10:31 a.m." (Savannah OMR). "On the 5th the center 
of a tropical disturbance passed approximately 25 miles west of the station. 
Actual property damage was slight though a considerable number of trees were 
blown down, breaking power lines and telephone connections" (Charleston OMR). 
Columbia experienced, "...2.42 inches in 24 hours on the 4th-5th. The center of 
that tropical storm which killed several hundred people in the Florida Keys 
passed just east of the station at 4:40 p.m. on the 5th where only a 20 mph wind 
was observed" (Columbia OMR). Raleigh weather office also noted that "nearly 
half of the month’s total precipitation occurred on the 5th" (OMR).  “On the 5th, 
mostly during afternoon, the tropical disturbance on its northward passage 
from the west Florida Coast, considerably damaged property and crops in the 
coastal region; property damage was estimated at $15,000 altogether, most of 
which was reported from the vicinities of Beaufort, Walterboro and Georgetown.  
Maximum wind velocities from 45 to 55 miles per hour were reported.  Much cotton 
staple was blown on the ground, as well as corn, cane and other unharvested crops.  
Several persons were injured by falling trees” (South Carolina Climatological Data).  
“Some remarkably heavy rains, 5 inches or more, occurred as the well known Florida 
Keys hurricane passed over the southern section on the 4th and 5th, although highly 
destructive winds at that time were lacking.  However, the winds did cause extensive 
damage to crops in the fields and some minor damage to other property” (Georgia 
Climatological Data).

September 6: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 995 mb near 36N, 75W. HURDAT listed 
this as a Category 1 hurricane at 37N, 75.1W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicates a 
pressure of 985 mb near 37N, 75W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest a position 
slightly north of HURDAT to be most accurate. Station highlights: 28 kt NW and 999 mb 
at Norfolk at 12 UTC (OMR) and 997 mb (min pressure – no time given); 37 kt NW 
(max wind) and 1001 mb (min pressure) at Cape Henry (no time available) (Virginia 
Climatological Data); 38 kt SW (max wind) and 1001 mb (min pressure) at Hatteras 
(no time given) (North Carolina Climatological Data).  Ship highlights: 70 kt NW and 
985 mb at ~38.5N, ~74W at 15 UTC (MWR); 50 NNE and 984 mb at 39.7N, 69W at 22 UTC 
(MWR). On re-entry into the Atlantic Ocean, "On the morning of September 6 the center 
of disturbance passed near Cape Henry, VA., where the lowest barometer was only 
992 mb" (MWR). Norfolk observed, "thunderstorm conditions from early to late afternoon 
on the 6th where a tornado was also observed passing through western and northwestern 
sections of the city causing $22,000 in property damage but no loss of life (Norfolk OMR).  
“Storm damage was limited to a tornado near Farmville, Va. On the 5th, damaging 
$30,000 worth of buildings, $25,000 worth of crops, killing two people and injuring a 
dozen others; and to high winds on the same date in Norfolk and vicinity, with damage 
to buildings amounting to $14,000, and to crops $8,000.  In addition to the above, 
flood waters in the James River entailed a loss approximating $150,000, principally 
to crops.  Excessive rains on the 507th damaged highways to the extent of $450,000, 
and crops, principally corn, to the amount of $1,650,000” (Virginia Climatological Data).

September 7: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 985 mb near 43.5N, 55W, with a cold 
front analyzed extending from the center toward the north. HURDAT listed this as a 
strong extratropical storm at 42N, 55W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicates a pressure 
of 964 mb near 43N, 54.5W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest a position near HURDAT 
to be most accurate. Ship highlights: 60 kt N and 964 mb at 42N, 54W at ~12 UTC (MWR); 
70 kt WSW and 979 mb at 41.1N, 54.3W at 17 UTC (MWR).

September 8: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 980 mb near 48.5N, 37.5 with a cold 
front extending toward the south. HURDAT listed this as an extratropical storm at 48.5N, 
36.3W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicates a pressure around 948 mb near 46.5N, 37.5W at 
8 a.m. Available observations suggest a position significantly southeast of HURDAT to be 
most accurate. Ship highlights: 70 kt N and 954 mb at 46.4N, 37.4W at 15 UTC (MWR); 
70 kt WNW and 959 mb at 46.9N, 34.8W at 15 UTC (MWR).

September 9: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 970 mb near 54N, 34.5W. HURDAT listed 
this as an extratropical storm at 54N, 31.2W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicates a 
pressure of 973 mb near 54.5N, 32W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest a position 
near HURDAT to be most accurate. Ship highlights: 70 kt SW and 973 mb at 50N, 28.5W at 
03 UTC (MWR); 45 kt NW and 977 mb at 53.5N, 38.5W at 12 UTC (COA); 45 kt WNW and 972 mb 
at 53.5N, 36.5W at 17 UTC (COA).

September 10: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 985 mb near 57N, 39W. HURDAT listed 
this as an extratropical storm at 58N, 36W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicate the center 
near 57.5N, 37W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest a position significantly southwest 
of HURDAT to be most accurate. Ship highlights: 35 kt S and 975 mb at 55.5N, 37.5W at 
12 UTC (COA); 35 kt S and 992 mb at 57.3N, 33.2W at 12 UTC (HWM). Regarding the absorption 
into an extratropical cyclone "... off southern Greenland, it [the system] was lost on 
September 10 by merging with a cyclone of extratropical origin..." (MWR).

Genesis is maintained for this system on the 29th of August, as HWM and COADS observations 
show a closed circulation.  Minor track changes were introduced for everyone day of its 
existence as a tropical cyclone (29th through the 6th of September).  The system is begun 
northeast of Hispanola as a 25 kt tropical depression (originally a 35 kt tropical storm) 
that moved west-northwest toward southern Florida. No gales or low pressures were observed 
for the first three days of its existence and winds were reduced some from the 29th to early 
on September 1st based upon available observations of a weaker system. However, the WSW 
25 kt wind and 1009 mb pressure observations at 12 UTC on the 31st (on the weak side of 
the cyclone) provide evidence that the system had reached tropical storm intensity by that 
date.  Transition to a tropical storm is estimated to have occurred by 00 UTC on the 31st, 
42 hours after that originally shown in HURDAT.  The cyclone steadily increased in intensity 
from that point and it is estimated that the storm became a hurricane on September 1st 
around 12 UTC just south of Andros Island in the Bahamas (no change to that in HURDAT 
originally).  Over the next 24 hours, the system nearly doubled in intensity from 65 kt to 
120 kt on the 2nd. A central pressure of 924 mb at 21 UTC of the 2nd implies winds of 
138 kt from the Brown et al. intensifying subset of south of 25N pressure-wind relationship.  
135 kt is chosen for 18 UTC on the 2nd, a 5 kt increase from HURDAT originally.  (As the 
hurricane was undergoing rapid intensification, the 924 mb central pressure measurement at 
21 UTC is not representative of the central pressure at 18 UTC and thus is not included 
into HURDAT.)

The cyclone continued moving toward the Florida Keys and available observations estimate 
landfall to have occurred near 02 UTC on the 3rd at 24.8N 80.8W at Craig Key. Intensity at 
landfall has been estimated from central pressure observations at Craig Key [892 mb] 
indicating 164 kt winds from the intensifying subset of south of 25N and 162 kt from 
intensifying subset of north of 25N pressure-wind relationships.   The Dvorak pressure-wind 
relationship suggests 168 kt.  Regarding the probable RMW at landfall in the Keys, "it is 
estimated that the calm center was perhaps 8 miles in diameter" (MWR). Available observations 
suggest the RWM to be on the order of 5 nm (Ho et al).  This sized- RMW is smaller than what 
might be expected from climatology of this central pressure and landfall latitude (~10nm - 
Vickery et al).  The major hurricane also was moving 7 kt - slower than average conditions, 
while the outer closed isobar was 1010 mb - near average.  The combination of somewhat 
compensating a tiny RMW, a slowly moving cyclone, and near average environmental pressure 
led to the selection of 160 kt maximum 1 min 10 m winds at landfall in the Florida Keys.  
150 kt is chosen for 00 UTC on the 3rd in HURDAT. This maintains the hurricane’s intensity 
as Category 5, but increases its previous peak intensity from 140 kt to 160 kt – a major 
increase. After passing through the Keys, the hurricane moved toward the northwest and 
eventually north on the 4th before making its second landfall in northwest Florida (as an 
85 kt Category 2 hurricane, see below).  The intensity is brought down by 15 kt each at 12 
and 18 UTC on the 3rd, then by 10 kt each six hours during the 4th to be consistent with 
this second landfall.  

Second landfall occurred near 22 UTC on the 4th northwest of Cedar Key, near 29.6N 83.4W. 
Ho et al. estimated a central pressure of 960 mb, based upon a peripheral pressure reading 
of 980 mb from Egmont Key about 15 hours before landfall.  However, Cedar Key measured 
985 mb at 1750 UTC just a few hours before landfall, but did not measure winds.  The 
closest full weather station for the second landfall was at Apalachicola, which measured 
a minimum pressure of 997 mb at 2120 UTC and maximum 5 min winds of 25 kt from the NW 
at 20 UTC.  Apalachicola was about 85 nm west of the point of landfall.  Cedar Key’s 
985 mb was measured about 20 nm east of the hurricane’s center, as the cyclone was moving 
northward about four hours before landfall.  The central pressure at landfall is roughly 
estimated to 965 mb, based primarily upon the Cedar Key information.  This suggests an 
intensity of 90 kt from the Brown et al. north of 25N pressure-wind relationship and 
86 kt from the subset of weakening cyclones.  The Ho et al estimate of about a 20 nm 
RMW is close to near average (23 nmi) from central pressure and landfall latitude 
climatology (Vickery et al), as is the translational velocity (9 kt) and outer closed 
isobar (1012 mb). Thus 85 kt at the second landfall in Florida is analyzed here, making 
this a Category 2 hurricane impact with a 10 kt increase in intensity compared to HURDAT 
originally in the 18 UTC slot.  During the 5th, the hurricane moved toward the northeast 
as it traversed over Georgia and South Carolina.  Runs of the Kaplan-DeMaria inland 
decay wind model indicate maximum winds of 55 kt at 00Z on the 5th, 44 kt at 06Z, 38 kt 
at 12Z, 34 kt at 18Z, and 34 kt at 00Z on the 6th.   Highest observed wind after landfall 
were (within two hours of synoptic time):  30 kt at 00Z on the 5th, 70 kt at 06Z 
(from a ship), 35 kt at 12Z, 37 kt at 18Z, and 45 kt at 00Z on the 6th (from a ship).  
Land based observations late on the 5th and on the 6th were only 42 kt from Savannah, 
41 kt from Wilmington, and 40 kt from Charleston.  A few 60 kt observations and a 70 kt 
ship report were reported later on the 6th, as the system re-entered back over the 
Atlantic around 10 Z on the 6th.   Maximum winds are re-analyzed to be 75 kt at 00Z on 
the 5th (up 15 kt), 65 kt at 06Z (up 5 kt), 55 kt at 12Z (unchanged), and 50 kt at 
18Z on the 5th (down 5 kt).  A 996 mb pressure observation from Raleigh is likely a 
central pressure and is added in at the 06 UTC on the 6th.  This pressure suggests 
maximum winds of 55 kt from the Landsea et al. north of 35N pressure-wind relationship.  
The intensity is analyzed to be 50 kt (down from 60 kt originally), due to the system 
being overland.  The cyclone re-intensified back to a minimal Category 1 hurricane at 
12Z on the 6th (unchanged). The hurricane raced off towards the east-northeast and 
quickly lost its tropical characteristics early on the 7th. The hurricane became 
extratropical around 00 UTC on the 7th (six hours earlier than original HURDAT).  
The 80 kt originally in HURDAT on the 7th as an extratropical cyclone is supported 
by a 60 kt N/964 mb around 12 UTC and a 70 kt WSW/979 mb at 17 UTC.  The cyclone 
underwent rapid deepening as an extratropical cyclone on that date.  HURDAT suggests 
the system weakened on the 8th and 9th but available observations indicate the storm 
maintained 75kt on the 8th and 70 kt on the 9th. HURDAT dissipates the system on the 
10th after 12 UTC. Ship observations are in agreement with the dissipation time in HURDAT.

Jarrell et al lists this as a Category 5 hurricane in southwest Florida (Keys) and 
as a Category 2 hurricane in northwest Florida. HURDAT's original winds suggested a 
landfalling hurricane as a Category 5 in the Keys, but only a Category 1 in northwest 
Florida. Available observations conclude that it was indeed a Category 5 hurricane 
for the Florida Keys (for both southwest and southeast Florida, due to the breakdown 
of Florida's four regions).  The hurricane is re-analyzed as a Category 2 for northwest 
Florida.   The system is now analyzed to also have caused Category 1 winds in Georgia, 
which was not indicated previously by the HURDAT winds or by Jarrell et al.  "Total 
property losses entailed by this hurricane are very difficult to estimate, but 
doubtless exceed $6,000,000; practically all the loss was suffered in Florida and 
most of it over the Florida Keys" (MWR). "The loss of life on the Keys was very heavy. 
Three populous relief work camps inhabited by war veterans were destroyed. The best 
estimate of mortalities, furnished by the American Red Cross, places the total at 409, 
of which 244 are known dead and 165 missing" (MWR).  The infamous "Labor Day Hurricane" 
was one of only three Category 5 hurricanes to hit the U.S. in the 20th century.


Storm 4 (originally 3), 1935

26740 08/30/1935 M= 3  3 SNBR= 589 NOT NAMED   XING=0      
27870 08/31/1935 M= 4  4 SNBR= 616 NOT NAMED   XING=0 SSS=0
         **         *  *

26745 08/30*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0*220 875  40    0*210 886  35    0*
26745 08/30*205 860  25    0*205 870  25    0*205 880  25    0*205 890  25    0*
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***  **  
   
26750 08/31*203 896  35    0*200 904  35    0*197 913  35    0*193 924  35    0*
27880 08/31*204 901  25    0*203 912  30    0*201 920  35    0*198 927  40    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***          *** ***  **


26755 09/01*191 934  35    0*189 941  35    0*188 948  30    0*180 970  25    0*
27885 09/01*193 933  45    0*190 939  50    0*188 945  50    0*187 952  50    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **          ***  **      *** ***  **

(The 2nd is new to HURDAT.)
27887 09/02*186 960  35    0*185 969  30    0*184 980  25    0*  0   0   0    0

26760 TS


Minor changes to the track, but major alterations to the intensity shown in McAdie 
et al. (2009), originally storm number 3. Evidence for these alterations comes from 
the Historical Weather Maps series, the COADS ship database, Mexican observations 
from NCDC, and Monthly Weather Review.

August 30: HWM analyzed no features of interest near the Yucatan of Mexico.  HURDAT 
listed this as a tropical storm at 20.0N, 87.5W at the first position indicated at 
12Z. No gale force winds (or equivalent in pressure) were observed.

August 31: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1010 mb near 19.5N, 91W.  HURDAT 
listed this as a tropical storm at 19.7N, 91.3W. Available observations suggest a 
position slightly north of HURDAT to be most accurate. No gale force winds (or 
equivalent in pressure) were observed.  “Late in August a disturbance, appearing 
first as a weak circulation over Yucatan, moved westward on the 31st to the Bay of 
Campeche and showed some increase of intensity” (MWR).

September 1: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 18.5N, 94.5W.  HURDAT 
listed this as a tropical depression at 18.8N, 94.8W. Available observations suggest 
a position slightly northeast of HURDAT to be most accurate. Station highlights:  
58 kt N (max wind) at Veracruz (unknown time) and 1004 mb (min pressure) (Mexico); 
15 kt SW and 1001 mb at 12 UTC at Puerto Mexico (Mexico).   Ship highlights:  
35 kt at 12Z at 20N 94W and 1005 mb (unknown time) at 20N 94W (MWR).  “The disturbance 
did not increase much in intensity, and moved westward to pass inland south of Vera 
Cruz on the afternoon of September 1” (MWR).

September 2: HWM showed a broad area of low pressure over Mexico.  HURDAT suggests 
this system dissipated on the 1st after 18 UTC.   
Station highlight:  25 kt N and 1005 mb at Veracruz at 00 UTC (Mexico).

Genesis is begun for this tropical storm at 00Z on the 30th of August, 12 hours earlier 
than originally listed in HURDAT.  However, the system is begun as a 25 kt tropical 
depression (instead of a 40 kt tropical storm), which then moved west-southwestward 
across the Yucatan of Mexico and reached the southwestern Gulf of Mexico early on 
the 31st.  Minor track changes are made from the 30th until 12Z on the 1st of September.  
On the 1st, in contrast to the assessment by the MWR, the cyclone quickly intensified.  
As the system passed just north of Puerto Mexico on the 1st, the pressure at that 
location was 1001 mb with 15 kt SW wind at 12 UTC.  The pressure on the 31st at 
Puerto Mexico was 1011 mb – a ten mb drop then occurred over the next 24 hours.  
1001 mb peripheral pressure suggests maximum winds of at least 45 kt from the Brown 
et al. south of 25N pressure-wind relationship.  The cyclone made landfall just 
southeast of Veracruz, Mexico around 18 UTC on the 1st near 18.7N 95.2W.  
Observations available from Veracruz (58 kt N wind sometime late on the 1st) and 
the pressure reading/drop from Puerto Mexico indicate a stronger cyclone than 
originally shown.  However, it is possible that some of the strong winds indicated 
at Veracruz were due to funneling along the Mexican coast, which is a fairly 
frequent occurrence.  Moreover, the landfall point is about 60 nm from Veracruz, 
and the track does not take it closer than 20-30 nm - and that only after a 
significant passage over land.  These points contribute to the concern whether the 
Veracruz observation can be taken at face value. Intensity is estimated as 50 kt 
at 18Z on the 1st at landfall, though this is quite uncertain.  The peak intensity 
of the system was originally indicated to be 40 kt at its genesis point on the 
30th east of Yucatan.  Major increases in intensity are now shown for 12Z and 18Z 
on the 1st.  Dissipation of this storm is originally suggested in HURDAT to occur 
after 18Z the 1st, but available observations late on the 1st and early on the 2nd 
indicate that the system stayed over water longer and remained a tropical cyclone 
through 12Z on the 2nd.  00Z to 12Z on the 2nd are added to HURDAT.


Storm 5 (originally 4), 1935

26765 09/23/1935 M=10  4 SNBR= 590 NOT NAMED   XING=0         
27895 09/23/1935 M=10  5 SNBR= 617 NOT NAMED   XING=0
                       *

26770 09/23*  0   0   0    0*148 730  35    0*146 734  40    0*144 739  45    0*
27900 09/23*  0   0   0    0*148 747  25    0*146 750  25    0*144 753  30    0
                                 ***  **          ***  **          ***  **

26775 09/24*142 745  50    0*141 753  55    0*141 760  60    0*141 768  65    0*
27905 09/24*142 757  35    0*141 761  40    0*141 765  45    0*141 770  50    0
                ***  **          ***  **          ***  **          ***  ** 

26780 09/25*142 775  70    0*143 782  75    0*145 787  80    0*147 791  80    0*
27910 09/25*142 777  55    0*143 784  60    0*145 790  65    0*147 794  70    0
                ***  **          ***  **          ***  **          ***  **

26785 09/26*150 795  85    0*153 799  90    0*157 801  90    0*162 800  90    0*
27915 09/26*149 797  75    0*151 798  80    0*153 798  85    0*157 798  90    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***  

26790 09/27*168 797  95    0*175 792  95    0*183 790 100    0*191 793 100    0*
27920 09/27*162 798  95    0*167 798  95    0*172 798 100    0*180 799 100    0
            *** ***          *** ***          *** ***          *** ***

26795 09/28*199 797 105    0*212 802 105    0*227 804 100    0*240 802 100    0*
27925 09/28*192 801 105    0*214 803 105  955*227 804 100    0*240 802 105    0
            *** ***          *** ***      ***                          ***

26800 09/29*252 796 100    0*260 790 100    0*267 782 100    0*277 770 100    0*
27930 09/29*252 796 120    0*260 790 120    0*267 782 115    0*277 770 110    0
                    ***              ***              ***              ***

26805 09/30*288 752 100    0*301 729  95    0*314 704  95    0*327 679  90    0*
27935 09/30*288 752 105    0*301 729 100    0*314 704  95    0*327 684  90    0
                    ***              ***                           *** 

26810 10/01*343 654  90    0*365 635  85    0*388 620  80    0E407 615  75    0*
27940 10/01*343 670  90    0*365 655  90    0*388 635  85    0*407 615  85    0
                ***              ***  **          ***  **     *         **

26815 10/02E430 602  65    0E458 579  60    0E487 536  50    0E499 515  50    0*
27945 10/02*430 590  75    0E458 565  65    0E487 536  60    0E499 505  55    0
           *    ***  **          ***  **               **          ***  **
26820 HR

U.S. Tropical Storm Impact:
----------------------------
Date            Time  Lat    Lon    Max Wind at coast 
09/29/1935*     0000Z 25.2N  79.6W  55kt 
(*Time and location of point of closest approach.)

Minor changes to the track but major alterations to the intensity shown in McAdie 
et al. (2009), originally storm number 4. Another major change is to indicate a 
U.S. hurricane impact from this cyclone.  Evidence for these alterations comes 
from the Historical Weather Maps series, the COADS ship database, Monthly Weather 
Review, Florida Climatological Data, Jamaica Weather Report from NCDC, and Perez 
et al (2000).

September 23: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1010 mb near 12.5N, 73W. HURDAT 
listed this as a tropical storm at 14.6N, 73.4W. Available observations suggest a 
position farther west of HURDAT. No gale force winds (or equivalent in pressure) 
were observed. "The first positive indication of a disturbance of sufficient vigor 
to be classed as a definite tropical cyclone was an observation of southwest wind, 
force 4, with rain and a confused sea, reported by the American S.S. San Gil, 
7 p.m., when near 14N, 75W" (MWR).

September 24: HWM indicated a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 13.5N, 76.5W. 
HURDAT listed this as a tropical storm at 14.1N, 76W. Available observations 
suggest a position farther west of HURDAT. No gale force winds (or equivalent 
in pressure) were observed.

September 25: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1000 mb near 14.5N, 78W. HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 1 hurricane at 14.5N, 78.7W. Available observations 
suggest a position slightly west of HURDAT. Ship highlights: 15 kt S and 1006 mb 
at 14N, 80.5W at 12 UTC (COA); 25 kt SW and 1005 mb at 14.3N, 79.4W at 18 UTC (COA). 

September 26: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 995 mb near 15N, 80W. HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 2 hurricane at 15.7N, 80.1W. Available observations 
suggest a position slightly southeast of HURDAT. Ship highlights: 70 kt WNW and 
986 mb at 15N, 80W at 03 UTC (MWR); 50 kt W and 991 mb at 15N, 80W at 12 UTC (HWM); 
45 kt W and 988 mb at 15.1N, 80.2W at 18 UTC (COA). "At 11 p.m. of the 25th, the 
American tanker A.C. Bedford experienced a minimum barometer of 29.13 inches 
[986 mb] attended by west-northwest hurricane winds, her position being then 
very near 15N, 80W. The disturbance seems to have progressed at a very slow rate 
during the 26th, and to have taken a recurving path toward the western end of 
Jamaica" (MWR).  “A tropical disturbance moving westward through the Caribbean 
Sea, turned toward the north near 80th meridian on the 26th” 
(Florida Climatological Data).

September 27: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 995 mb near 16.5N, 79.5W. 
HURDAT listed this as a Category 3 hurricane at 18.3N, 79W. The MWR Tracks of 
Cyclones indicate the center near 17N, 80W at 8 a.m. Available observations 
suggest a position slightly southwest of HURDAT. Ship highlights: 45 kt S and 
1001 mb at 17.3N, 78.6W at 13 UTC (MWR); 45 kt S and 1000 mb at 17.3N, 78.7W 
at 15 UTC (COA).  Station highlights:  35 kt S (max winds) with 1001 mb at 
20 UTC and 22 kt S with 1000 mb (min pressure) at Negril Point (Jamaica).  
"While the history of this disturbance is continuous from the afternoon of 
September 23 until October 2, there is a period of 36 hours, September 26 
and 27, during which the characteristics and movement of the storm are 
obscure and apparently abnormal.  Data from ships' reports and island 
stations are too meager to permit reconstruction of the full history of 
storm activities during the 27th... high winds and excessive rains in 
Jamaica, causing heavy damage to the banana crop" (MWR).  “The effect of 
the storm was marked in Jamaica by serious loss in banana cultivation.  
The parishes nearer to the centre, such as Hanover and St. James, suffered 
total loss, diminishing in destructiveness over the remainder of the Island.  
There was no loss of life or damage to structures or shipping deserving of 
notice, for the wind even at Negril did not exceed gale force” (Jamaica).

September 28: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 995 mb near 22.5N, 80W.  
HURDAT listed this as a Category 3 hurricane at 22.7N, 80.4W. The MWR Tracks 
of Cyclones indicates a pressure of 958 mb near 22.5N, 80.5W at 8 a.m. Available 
observations suggest HURDAT to be most accurate. Station highlights: 959 mb at 
Cienfuegos, Cuba at 09 UTC (MWR);  955 mb Montserrat Observatory, Cienfuegos, Cuba 
(Perez); 21 kt N and 999 mb at Key West at 18 UTC (OMR). Ship highlights: 20 kt N 
and 1004 mb at 24.7N, 84.2W at 12 UTC (COA); 25 kt E and 1000 mb 25N, 80.1W at 12 
UTC (COA). "Early on the 28th, the city of Cienfuegos, Cuba, was seriously affected 
by passage of the hurricane center, with lowest barometer unofficially reported at 
28.31 inches [959 mb].  There was heavy property damage in Cienfuegos, Cumanay Agua, 
and other Cuban localities, as the hurricane crossed the island, and the casualties 
in Cuba were estimated at 35 deaths and possibly 500 injured. Much damage was due 
to the floods that attended the passage of the storm" (MWR).  Cuba's summarized 
accounts for this storm are noted as, "a Category 3 hurricane affecting the central 
provinces with hurricane conditions and aptly named El Huracan de Cienfuegos" 
(Perez et al).  “It reached the Cuban coast near Cienfuegos with full hurricane 
intensity, causing loss of 35 lives, and much property.  Crossing Cuba it diminished 
in intensity, but after crossing increased again” (Florida Climatological Data).
  
September 29: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 995 mb near 26.5N, 78W.  HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 3 hurricane at 26.7N, 78.2W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones 
indicates a pressure of 951 mb near 27N, 78W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest 
HURDAT to be most accurate.  Station highlights: 70 kt N (max wind) and 990 mb 
(min pressure) at Fowey Rock at 02 UTC (MWR); 35 kt NE (max wind) and 994 mb (min 
pressure) at Miami at 0145 UTC (MWR/OMR); 945 mb at Bimini at 03 UTC and calm (eye) 
at 0420 UTC (MWR). Ship highlights: 45 kt SE and 992 mb at 27.5N, 76.1W at 15 UTC 
(COA); 70 kt SE and 951 mb at 27.2N, 76.5W at 17 UTC (MWR). ""...the hurricane moved 
into a broad recurve that carried the center over the island of Bimini, where at 
12:20 a.m. of the 29th, the wind shifted from southeast to northwest. The last 
barometer reading to be received from Bimini was 27.90 inches [945 mb], at 11 p.m., 
more than an hour in advance of passage of the center which was doubtless marked by 
considerably lower minimum pressure.  Highest wind was estimated at 120 miles per hour
…Fowey-Rock Lighthouse, 12 miles southeast of Miami, experienced hurricane winds 
from the north, estimated at maximum to have been about 85 mph, with a barometer 
reading of 29.24 inches [990 mb]…The American steamer La Perla was near the hurricane 
center at 1 p.m. of September 29, at 27 degrees 14 minutes north, 76 degrees and 
28 minutes west, with a barometer reading of 28.08 inches [951 mb]. Later in the 
day (9 p.m.) the Japanese steamer Tokai maru, near 28.5N, 74W met the hurricane with 
winds veering from east-southeast to west-southwest, and a barometer of 28.24 inches 
[956 mb]" (MWR).  “When the storm center was about 40 miles southeast of Miami, it 
turned toward the northeast, crossing Bimini about 11 p. m. of the 28th, with 
hurricane force winds and a barometer reading of 27.90… Hurricane winds were 
reported at Fowey Rocks about 12 miles southeast of Miami, but there was little 
damage on the Florida mainland or on the Florida Keys” (Florida Climatological 
Data).  “…with Bimini's barometer reading 27.90 inches [945 mb] and winds estimated 
at 120 mph…The southeast coast of Florida experienced minimal hurricane conditions 
[late] on the 28th" (Dunn and Miller 1960).

September 30: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 990 mb near 31N, 70W.  HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 2 hurricane at 31.4N, 70.4W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones 
indicates a pressure of 975 mb near 24.5N, 71W at 8 a.m. Available observations 
suggest HURDAT to be most accurate. Ship highlights: 70 kt WNW and 956 mb at 28.5N, 
74.0W at 01 UTC (MWR); 35 kt ENE and 990 mb at 30.5N, 71.7W at 08 UTC (MWR); 
40 kt SW and 1004 mb at 27.3N, 78.3W at 12 UTC (HWM).  “It continued its northeastward 
movement across the northern Bahamas and passed northwest of Bermuda on the 30th” 
(Florida Climatological Data).

October 1: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1000 mb near 37.5N, 63W. The map 
also indicates the system is becoming elongated southwest to northeast. HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 1 hurricane at 38.8N, 62W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones 
indicates a pressure of 981mb near 37.5N, 63W at 8 a.m. Available observations 
suggest a position west of HURDAT to be most accurate. Ship highlights: 45 kt ENE 
and 1003 mb at 39.5N, 64.5W at 12 UTC (COA); 70 kt NNW and 987 mb at ~39.1N, ~64.0W 
at 15 UTC (MWR); 70 kt WSW and 972 mb at 42.2N, 59.5W at 21 UTC.

October 2: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 48N, 52W with a 
westward pointing warm front indicated west of the center. HURDAT listed this 
as an extratropical storm at 48.7N, 53.6W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicates 
a pressure of 1005 mb near 48N, 54W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest 
HURDAT to be most accurate. Ship highlights: 70 kt SSE and 987 mb at 44N, 57.2W 
at 03 UTC (MWR); 45 kt S and 1005 mb at 48.5N, 50.2W at 12 UTC (COA).

Genesis for this major hurricane is maintained at 06Z on September 23rd.  HURDAT 
previously suggested the system was a tropical storm at the time of genesis on the 
23rd, however, available observations indicate no gales (or equivalent in pressure) 
occurred. Thus, 25 kt is chosen for HURDAT. Minor track changes were introduced for 
each day from the 23rd until the 29th.  No track alterations were introduced on the 
30th until dissipation on the 2nd.  It is analyzed that the system acquired tropical 
storm intensity early on the 24th, 18 hours later than originally.  Numerous 
observations on the 24th and 25th indicate a weaker cyclone than originally found 
in HURDAT and minor reductions are made to the intensity on those dates.  
Intensification to hurricane strength is now shown to be at 12Z on the 25th, 
18 hours later than originally indicated.  A peripheral pressure of 986 mb with 
concurrent 70 kt WNW was observed at 03Z on the 26th which suggests at least 70 kt 
maximum winds from the south of 25N pressure-wind relationship. 75 kt at 00Z and 
80 kt at 06Z are chosen for HURDAT, down from 85 and 90 kt originally.  MWR and 
HURDAT insist the storm moved north-northeast on the 26th, nearly brushing western 
Jamaica on the 27th, and then taking a more north-northwest track before landfall 
in Cienfuegos, Cuba. Available observations indicate a scenario such as this to be 
incorrect, suggesting the hurricane maintained a nearly continuous northward track 
on the 26th, 27th, and early on the 28th. Intensity estimates for the 27th are vague 
due to the lack of ships near the center. Thus the HURDAT winds are maintained for 
that date (95 kt at 00 and 06Z and 100 kt at 12 and 18Z).

On the 28th of September, the hurricane made landfall at 22.0N 80.4W near 
Cienfuegos, Cuba, around 08 UTC. A central pressure of 955 mb in Cienfuegos suggests 
106 kt from the Brown et al. south of 25N pressure-wind relationship.  105 kt is 
chosen for HURDAT and is unchanged from that in HURDAT originally. This makes the 
cyclone a Category 3 hurricane impact for Cuba and is in agreement with the assessment 
by Perez et al.  The hurricane began to take a northeastward track after landfall and 
continued this path through the rest of its lifecycle.  On the 29th the hurricane was 
centered just northeast of Bimini. Peripheral pressure observations on the 29th of 945 mb 
from Bimini implies winds of at least 118 and 115 kt, respectively, from the intensifying 
subset of south of 25N and north of 25N pressure-wind relationships, respectively. 
120 kt is chosen for HURDAT at 00 and 06Z on the 29th, up from 100 kt originally – a 
major upward change.  This makes the system a Category 4 hurricane to make landfall in 
the Bahamas and 120 kt is also the peak intensity for the hurricane (up from 105 kt as 
the original peak).  As the hurricane passed just southeast Florida early on the 29th, 
70 kt hurricane force winds were observed (by a visual estimate of the sea state) along 
with 990 mb minimum pressure at Fowey Rocks, a lighthouse just offshore Miami.  The 
maximum 5 min winds observed at the downtown Miami Weather Bureau Office were 35 kt.  
The Fowey Rocks lighthouse keeper’s observation of 70 kt is based upon a visual 
estimate of the sea state and not from an anemometer.  Given the uncertainty in this 
visual estimate, that it is at an offshore location a few miles from any coastal 
islands, and that there were no reports of significant wind-caused damage, the analysis 
of peak impact for southeast Florida is for a high end (~55 kt) tropical storm, along 
in a limited stretch of Miami-Dade County – in Elliot Key and nearby smaller islands.  

The hurricane progressed more rapidly toward the northeast on the 30th and October 1st. 
A peripheral pressure of 956 mb at 01Z on the 30th implies winds of at least 99 kt from 
the north of 25N pressure-wind relationship. 105 kt is chosen for HURDAT, up from 100 kt 
originally. HURDAT suggests the hurricane transitions to extratropical on the 1st at 
18 UTC but available observations indicate the transition did not occur until about 
06Z of the 2nd, 12 hours later than HURDAT. A peripheral pressure observation at 21Z 
on the 1st of 972 mb indicates at least 80 kt from the Landsea et al. north of 35N 
pressure-wind relationship. 85 kt is chosen for HURDAT at 18Z, up from 75 kt originally.  
Available observations indicate the cyclone dissipated after 18Z on the 2nd. 


Storm 6 (originally 5), 1935

26825 10/19/1935 M= 9  5 SNBR= 591 NOT NAMED   XING=0                           
27955 10/18/1935 M=10  6 SNBR= 618 NOT NAMED   XING=0
                   **  *  

(The 18th is new to HURDAT.)
27957 10/18*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0*132 810  25    0*132 803  25    0

26830 10/19*124 787  35    0*129 782  45    0*135 777  55    0*140 773  60    0*
27960 10/19*133 796  30    0*134 790  30    0*135 785  35    0*138 783  35    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **          ***  **      *** ***  **

26835 10/20*144 771  65    0*148 769  70    0*152 767  70    0*155 765  70    0*
27965 10/20*142 782  40    0*147 781  40    0*152 780  40    0*158 778  40    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **          ***  **      *** ***  **  

26840 10/21*159 763  75    0*165 760  75    0*172 757  75    0*179 756  75    0*
27970 10/21*165 775  45    0*172 771  45    0*178 767  50  995*183 764  55    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***  **  *** *** ***  **

26845 10/22*185 756  75    0*191 757  75    0*197 761  60    0*199 767  60    0*
27975 10/22*188 762  60    0*193 761  65    0*197 761  75    0*199 765  75    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **               **          ***  **

26850 10/23*197 774  60    0*194 780  60    0*191 785  50    0*188 790  45    0*
27980 10/23*198 769  65    0*195 773  55    0*191 778  50    0*187 784  50    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **          ***          *** ***  **

26855 10/24*184 794  45    0*182 797  45    0*179 801  55  988*174 807  65    0*
27985 10/24*183 791  55    0*179 798  60    0*175 805  60  988*170 811  65    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***  

26860 10/25*167 814  65    0*160 823  70    0*153 831  75    0*149 839  75    0*
27990 10/25*164 816  65    0*158 822  70    0*153 828  75    0*148 834  60    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***              ***          *** ***  **

26865 10/26*149 846  75    0*144 854  65    0*143 863  35    0*143 874  25    0*
27995 10/26*143 841  40    0*139 849  30    0*138 860  30    0*139 872  25    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***  

26870 10/27*143 879  20    0*143 884  15    0*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0*
28000 10/27*142 884  25    0*145 896  25    0*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **      
26875 HR

Major changes to both the track and the intensity shown in McAdie et al. (2009), 
originally storm number 5. Evidence for these alterations comes from the Historical 
Weather Maps series, the COADS ship database, Monthly Weather Review, Jamaica Weather 
Report from NCDC, and Perez et al (2000).

October 18: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 14N, 81W. HURDAT 
suggests the system originated on the 19th, however, available observations 
indicate the system began on the 18th as a tropical depression at 12 UTC. Ship 
highlights: 15 kt N and 1006 mb at 14.7N, 83.1W at 00 UTC (COA); 10 kt S and 
1002 mb at 12.9N, 80.7W at 12 UTC (COA)." As early as the morning of October 17 
there was some evidence of a wide-spread but weak cyclonic wind system in the 
southwestern Caribbean Sea, between Jamaica and Panama” (MWR).

October 19: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 13.5N, 80W. HURDAT 
listed this as a tropical storm at 13.5N, 77.7W. Available observations suggest a 
position west of HURDAT to be most accurate. Ship highlights: 40 kt SSW and 1004 mb 
at 13.5N, 77.8W at 20 UTC (MWR). "The development of this storm first became quite 
evident on the afternoon of October 19, when the American steamer Forbes Hauptmann 
experienced a south-southwest gale of force 9, with barometer 29.64 inches [1004 mb], 
near 13N, 79W" (MWR).

October 20: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 14.5N, 80.5W. HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 1 hurricane at 15.2N, 76.7W. Available observations suggest 
that a position southwest of HURDAT is most accurate. Ship highlights: 30 kt SSE and 
1005 mb at 15N, 77W at ~12 UTC (MWR); 20 kt NE and 1001 mb at 20N, 83.9W at 18 UTC (COA). 
"...the U.S.S. Chaumont, on the morning of the 20th, then near 15N, 77W, whence she 
reported south-southeast wind of force 7, and barometer reading 29.68 inches [1005 mb].  
Twelve hours later the northeastward direction of progression of the disturbance had 
been determined" (MWR).

October 21: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 15N, 78W. HURDAT listed 
this as a Category 1 hurricane at 17.2N, 75.7W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicate the 
center near 18N, 75.5W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest a position southwest of 
HURDAT to be most accurate. Ship highlights: 30 kt SE and 1006 mb at 18N, 75.9W at 13 UTC 
(COA); 35 kt NNE and 1003 mb at 18.7N, 77.2W at 19 UTC (COA). Station highlights:  
35 kt SE (max winds) and 1000 mb (min pressure) at 12 UTC at Morant Point (Jamaica); 
21 kt W and 999 mb (min pressure) at 14 UTC at Kingston (Jamaica).  "The storm moved 
northeastward as forecast, and the center passed close to Navassa Island during the 
afternoon of October 21" (MWR).  “This weather disturbance continued on a track about NNE, 
and evidently passed a little to the westward of Morant Point Lighthouse, then emerging 
seaward towards Santiago-de-Cuba…This disturbance in passing Morant Point Lighthouse on 
21st at about 9 a.m. did not appear to exceed gale force nor reach near hurricane winds…
At Jamaica, wind of gale force from the NNE and NE made its appearance from early on 20th 
over the parishes to the eastward of Jamaica…There was a further great loss to cultivation 
(since that of the 27th September).  The parishes of St. Thomas, Portland, and St. Mary 
had the greatest damage…Jamaica, particularly the eastern parishes, suffered extensive 
damages to cultivation.  There was no loss of life reported, nor were buildings seriously 
damaged” (Jamaica).

October 22: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1000 mb near 18.5N, 76W. HURDAT listed 
this as a tropical storm at 19.7N, 76.1W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicate a pressure 
of 994 mb near 20N, 76W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest that a position south of 
HURDAT is most accurate. Station highlights: 60 kt at Santiago (anemometer failed - MWR); 
50 kt ENE and 999 mb at Nipe Bay, Cuba, at 1830 UTC (MWR); 21 kt SW and 1003 mb 
(min pressure) at Negril Point at 23 UTC (Jamaica). Ship highlights: 25 kt S and 1004 mb 
at 18.2N, 75.2W at 12 UTC (COA); 15 kt SE and 1004 mb at 20N, 75W at 12 UTC (HWM). The 
hurricane's occurrence in Cuba is noted as, "a Category 1 hurricane that affected eastern 
provinces causing minimal damage throughout the 22-23" (Perez et al). "...the center 
[became close] to the coast of Cuba near Santiago, on the early morning of October 22.  
Torrential rains over extreme southwestern Haiti attended the storm’s passage, and press 
reports indicated a disastrous total of deaths, the actual number being uncertain but more 
than 1,000 and possibly as many as 2,000.  There was much damage to crops and property in 
Jamaica, the estimates of monetary losses exceeding $2,000,000.  An unidentified schooner 
and its entire crew were lost off Port Antonio, on the northeast coast, but no other report 
of deaths from this hurricane has been received from Jamaica.  There was considerable damage 
in the vicinity of Santiago, Cuba, as the cyclone moved into that region, and press reports 
indicate that four lives were lost there.  The wind exceeded 70 miles per hour in Santiago, 
as measured by an anemometer on a Pan-American Airways hangar which was blown down after 
that velocity had been recorded.  Whole gale and storm winds occurred on the opposite coast 
of Cuba near Nipe Bay (due north of Santiago), and also eastward from Santiago as far as 
Guantanamo Bay where there was minor storm damage" (MWR).  “After this hurricane moved forward, 
since passing Cape Cruz of Cuba, where it was located to the north west of the parish of 
Hanover, Jamaica, instrumental observations made by Mr. Edward Foster of Rose Mount showed 
that the storm centre was nearest to the Island at about 7 a.m. on the 23rd…The storm centre 
is estimated to have been, at 7 a.m. on the 23rd, about 100 miles to the NW of western Jamaica.  
It will be, therefore, gathered from the above that at no time, when this weather disturbance 
was either to the eastward or north-westward of Jamaica, did it attain hurricane force in 
this Island” (Jamaica).

October 23: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 17N, 78W. HURDAT listed this 
as a tropical storm at 19.1N, 78.5W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicate the center near 19N, 
78.5W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest a position slightly south of HURDAT to be most 
accurate. Ship highlights: 15 kt N and 1003 mb at 19.1N, 78.5W at 12 UTC (COA); 30 kt ESE 
and 1004 mb at 19.2N, 74.4W at 12 UTC (COA).  "The hurricane center was undoubtedly deflected 
and much weakened in intensity by the Sierra Maestra Mountains, which front the coast westward 
from Santiago.  During October 22 and 23 the disturbance moved westward and then southwestward, 
and it started back again across the Caribbean Sea, to increase in intensity and resume full 
hurricane force before entering Honduras near Cape Gracias, on October 25" (MWR).

October 24: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 990 mb near 16.5N, 80.5W. HURDAT listed 
this as a tropical storm at 17.9N, 80.1W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicate a pressure of 
988 mb near 18N, 81.5W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest that a position southwest 
of HURDAT is most accurate. Ship highlights: calm winds and 988 mb at 17.7N, 80.4W at 10 UTC 
and 40 kt after 10 UTC (MWR); 35 kt N and 1004 mb at 19.2N, 81.6W at 12 UTC (HWM); 35 kt SE 
and 998 mb at 17.4N, 80.4W at 17 UTC (COA). "The only ship to report a close contact with the 
storm during its southwestward movement over the open sea was the American steamer Afel, on 
the morning of October 24, had the lowest barometer so far reported in connection with this 
hurricane at 29.18 inches [988 mb], as the central calm passed over the vessel in 17 degrees 
44 minutes north, 80 degrees 26 minutes west. The highest wind experienced there was only a 
strong gale (Beaufort 9) which came up from the southeast after the passage of the calm center.  
The vortex was evidently deepening again at this time, after being very weak during the 
preceding day, but it had not attained hurricane force" (MWR).

October 25: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 995 mb near 152N, 82W. HURDAT listed this 
as a Category 1 hurricane at 15.3N, 83.1W. Available observations suggest that a position 
just east of HURDAT to be most accurate. Ship highlights: 30 kt W and 999 mb at ~14.9N, 
~83.3W at 08 UTC (MWR); 40 kt NNW and 995 mb at ~15.3N, ~83.4W at 08 UTC (MWR); 25 kt W and 
1000 mb at 14.5N, 83.2W at 12 UTC (COA).  Station highlights:  70 kt at Cape Gracias a Dios 
around 12Z (MWR).  “Next reports from the immediate vicinity of the storm center came on the 
morning of the 25th from the Honduran steamers Contessa and Sinaloa, and from the meteorological 
station at Cape Gracias a Dios, the latter reporting hurricane winds as the center passed 
nearby on the morning of October 25” (MWR).

October 26: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1000 mb near 13.5N, 84.5W. HURDAT listed 
this as a minimal tropical storm at 14.3N, 86.3W. Available observations suggest that a position 
southeast of HURDAT is most accurate. Station highlights: 5 kt SW and 1005 mb at Bluefields at 
12 UTC (HWM). Ship highlights:  35 kt NE and 1007 mb at 16.5N 86.0W at 12 UTC (Mexico);  
35 kt NE and 1008 mb at 16.2N 87.0W at 12 UTC (Mexico);  10 kt SSW and 1005 mb at 12.4N, 83W 
at 00 UTC (COA).  “The evidence at hand indicates that the storm weakened slowly after passing 
inland over Honduras, and curved westward along the fifteenth parallel of latitude, dying out in 
the interior after the 26th.  Much damage to property and banana plantations occurred in 
northeastern Honduras, with some lesser damage in extreme northeastern Nicaragua, mostly due 
to floods.  About 150 lives were lost here, mainly in Honduras” (MWR).

October 27: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 15N, 92W. HURDAT listed this 
as a tropical depression at 14.3N, 88.4W at 06 UTC. Available observations suggest that a 
position significantly farther west of HURDAT to be most accurate. Station highlights: 
calm winds and 1005 mb at Tapachula, Mexico, at 12 UTC (HWM). Ship highlights: 25 kt NNW 
and 1004 mb at 14.4N, 93.5W at 12 UTC (COA).  “The hurricane adds another unprecedented 
track to the history of West Indian hurricanes.  The center moved over a path about 1,400 
miles in length, practically encircling the island of Jamaica in the loop along which its 
normal northeastward movement was reversed into an abnormal southwestward course, and it 
passed inland over Honduras only about 250 miles from the place, where, a week  before, 
it had its origin” (MWR).

Genesis is begun for this system at 12 UTC on October the 18th as a tropical depression, 
12 hours earlier than previously recorded in HURDAT.  Minor track changes are introduced 
for every day of its existence, except for the 27th where a major westward shift is 
introduced into the last entry in the existing HURDAT.  Tropical storm intensity is 
attained for this system at 12 UTC on the 19th, which is 12 hours later than originally 
shown. During the 19th and the 20th, there are no reports of pressures below 1000 mb, no 
reports of winds above 40 kt, and the system has a large envelope with relatively low 
environmental pressures. The intensities are reduced substantially for these two days.  
The system made landfall in eastern Jamaica around 13 UTC on the 21st, near 17.9N 76.6W.  
Observations from Morant Point Lighthouse and Kingston indicate a central pressure at 
landfall of around 995 mb.  This pressure suggests and intensity of 56 kt from the Brown 
et al. south of 25N pressure-wind relationship.  However, because of the slow movement 
and low environmental pressure, the intensity at landfall is estimated to be 50 kt.  
This is 25 kt less than originally shown in HURDAT at 12 UTC on the 21st and HURDAT kept 
the center east of Jamaica.  Major reductions of at least 20 kt are thus introduced from 
12 UTC on the 19th to 18 UTC on the 21st.  The system became a minimal Category 1 
hurricane around 06 UTC on the 22nd, more than two days later than originally indicated.  
Available observations indicate landfall in Cuba occurred near Santiago around 18 UTC of 
the 22nd. Peak observations near landfall were 60 kt (with the anemometer failing after 
that observation) and 999 mb pressure.  The 75 kt intensity is maintained until landfall 
in Cuba, making this a Category 1 hurricane consistent with Perez et al.’s assessment.  
75 kt is the peak intensity for the cyclone and is unchanged from that originally shown 
in HURDAT.  A slow decrease in intensity is indicated on the 23rd as the storm moved 
southwest back over the Caribbean Sea. A peripheral pressure of 1003 mb was observed at 
12 UTC on the 23rd implying at least 41 kt from the south of 25N pressure-wind relationship. 
50 kt is maintained in HURDAT. An eye pressure of 988 mb was measured by ship at 10 UTC on 
the 24th, but with only 40 kt SE maximum winds during the ship’s passage through the cyclone.  
This pressure suggests 67 kt from the south of 25N pressure wind relationship.   Because of 
the system’s slow speed (8 kt) and the lack of hurricane force winds from this ship, 60 kt 
is chosen for HURDAT at 12 UTC on the 24th (up from 55 kt originally). Two ships observed 
peripheral pressures of 995 and 999 mb at 08 UTC on the 25th, implying at least winds of 
56 and 49 kt, respectively, from the south of 25N pressure-wind relationship. 70 kt is 
maintained in HURDAT at 06 UTC on the 25th.  A second landfall occurred near 16 UTC on 
the 25th.  Peak observed winds were “hurricane force” in Cape Gracias a Dios, Honduras 
on the 25th.  75 kt at 12 UTC on the 25th is maintained and is also assessed to be the 
landfall intensity.   This secondary peak of intensity matches what the cyclone attained 
on the 22nd.  HURDAT unrealistically maintained the system as a hurricane for 18 hours 
after landfall over mountainous Honduras and Nicaragua.  The two best analogues for this 
system during the last two decades – as far as track goes – are 2007’s Felix and 2005’s 
Beta.  Felix made landfall with 140 kt, weakened to 85 kt in six hours, 50 kt in 12 hours, 
and 25 kt in 18 hours.  Beta made landfall with 90 kt, weakened to 55 kt in six hours, and 
20 kt in 12 hours.  These were utilized to refine the intensity as the cyclone decayed over 
Central America, with even weaker intensities than earlier estimated.  A much quicker 
weakening is now indicated with intensity at 60 kt at 18 UTC on the 25th (originally 75 kt), 
40 kt at 00 UTC on the 26th (originally 75 kt), and 30 kt at 06 UTC (originally 65 kt).  
The system continued to progress westward and dissipated over Central America on the 27th.  
The dissipation after 06 UTC on the 27th is unchanged.


Storm 7 (originally 6), 1935

26880 10/30/1935 M=10  6 SNBR= 592 NOT NAMED   XING=1 SSS=2                    
28010 10/30/1935 M=10  7 SNBR= 619 NOT NAMED   XING=1 SSS=2
                       *

26885 10/30*  0   0   0    0*326 609  35    0*328 618  35    0*330 628  40    0*
28015 10/30*  0   0   0    0*323 609  35    0*325 620  35    0*327 630  40    0
                             ***              *** ***          *** *** 

26890 10/31*331 637  40    0*333 645  45    0*334 653  50    0*335 666  55    0*
28020 10/31*329 640  40    0*331 650  45    0*334 660  50    0*338 671  55    0
            *** ***          *** ***              ***          *** ***  

26895 11/01*337 681  60    0*337 697  60    0*336 712  65    0*335 726  70    0*
28025 11/01*342 682  60    0*344 693  60    0*345 705  65    0*343 719  70    0
            *** ***          *** ***          *** ***          *** ***

26900 11/02*332 738  70    0*328 750  70  980*322 757  70    0*316 759  70    0*
28030 11/02*340 735  70    0*336 747  75  980*330 755  75    0*320 759  80    0
            *** ***          *** ***  **      *** ***  **      ***      **

26905 11/03*309 760  70    0*302 760  70    0*295 761  70    0*286 764  65    0*
28035 11/03*308 760  85    0*294 761  90    0*282 763  90  964*274 767  90    0   
            ***      **      *** ***  **      *** ***  **  *** *** ***  **

26910 11/04*277 771  65    0*270 779  65    0*265 787  65    0*258 803  65  973*
28040 11/04*269 773  90    0*265 780  85    0*262 789  85    0*259 801  85  973  
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***  **      *** ***  **

26915 11/05*253 811  65    0*249 825  65    0*249 835  65    0*251 843  65    0*
28045 11/05*257 813  70    0*256 822  65    0*255 830  65    0*256 838  65    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***          *** ***          *** ***   

26920 11/06*252 850  60    0*255 857  60    0*260 863  55    0*264 867  50    0*
28050 11/06*259 846  60    0*262 854  55    0*265 861  50    0*268 867  45    0
            *** ***          *** ***  **      *** ***  **      ***      **

26925 11/07*268 870  45    0*275 871  40    0*280 869  35    0*281 858  30    0*
28055 11/07*271 870  40    0*273 872  35    0*275 872  35    0*276 869  30    0
            ***      **      *** ***  **      *** ***          *** ***

26930 11/08*278 847  25    0*277 842  20    0*276 837  15    0*275 834  15    0*
28060 11/08*276 864  30    0*276 857  25    0E276 850  25    0E276 843  20    0
            *** ***  **      *** ***  **     *    ***  **     **** ***  **

26935 HRCFL2
28065 HRCFL2BFL1
            ****

U.S.  Hurricane Landfall
4ht/18 UTC  25.9N 80.1W  973 mb  85 kt  CFL2, BFL1

Minor changes to the track, but major alterations to the intensity shown in McAdie et al. 
(2009), originally storm number 6.  Another major change is to show an extratropical stage 
on the last day of the cyclone’s existence.  Evidence for these alterations comes from the 
Historical Weather Maps series, the COADS ship database, Original Monthly Records from NCDC, 
Monthly Weather Review, Barnes (1998), Dunn and Miller (1960), and Jarrell et al (1992).

October 25:  HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1010 mb near 32N 59W along a NE-SW 
oriented frontal boundary.  Neither the MWR Tracks of Cyclones, nor HURDAT begins this 
cyclone until the 30th of October.  No gale force winds or low pressures reported.

October 26:  HWM indicates an open low of at most 1005 mb near 30N 52W along a N-S 
oriented frontal boundary.  Ship highlights:  45 kt S with 1009 mb at 32.5N 45.5W at 
19 UTC (COA); 45 kt S with 1011 mb at 32.5N 46.5W at 23 UTC (COA).

October 27:  HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 34N 52W along a N-S 
oriented frontal boundary.  Ship highlights:  35 kt S with 1008 mb at 35.4N 45.4W 
at 03 UTC (COA).

October 28:  HWM indicates an open low of at most 1015 mb near 30N 50W along a N-S 
oriented frontal boundary.  No gale force winds or low pressures.

October 29:  HWM indicates a NE-SW oriented warm front intersecting a NW-S-SW oriented 
cold front at 31N 57W.  Ship highlights:  35 kt N with 1027 mb at 39.3W 51.6W at 00 UTC 
(COA);  35 kt NE with 1027 mb at 39.6N 50.5W at 12 UTC (COA).

October 30: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1015 mb near 32, 62.5W. HURDAT listed 
this as a tropical storm at 32.8N, 61.8W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicate the center 
near 33N, 62W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest a position slightly southwest of 
HURDAT to be most accurate. Ship highlights:  35 kt E and 1028 mb at 38.8N 59.7W at 
12 UTC (HWM).  "This storm seemingly was of extratropical origin, since it first appeared 
as a small and weak depression central about 32N, some distance east of Bermuda, early on 
October 30" (MWR).

October 31: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1015 mb near 33N, 67W. HURDAT listed 
this as a tropical storm at 33.4N, 65.3W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicate the center 
near 34N, 65.5W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest a position slightly west of 
HURDAT to be most accurate. Station highlight:  30 kt N and 1017 mb at Bermuda at 
12 UTC (MWR).  Ship highlights: 35 kt WSW and 1000 mb at 33N, 65.2W at 05 UTC (MWR).  
“It progressed west-by-north, passed close north of Bermuda, and, continuing in a general 
west-by-north to west-northwesterly course with increasing intensity, because a distinct 
threat to the entire Carolina coast by the morning of November 1” (MWR).

November 1: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 33N, 71W. HURDAT listed 
this as a Category 1 hurricane at 33.6N, 71.2W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicate the 
center near 34N, 70.5W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest a position northeast of 
HURDAT to be most accurate. Station (peak) highlights: 35 kt N at Cape Hatteras (MWR).  
Ship highlights: 40 kt ESE and 1005 mb at 33.5N, 73.5W at 12 UTC (HWM); 60 kt E and 
990 mb at 35.3N, 72.1W at 18 UTC (MWR); 60 kt SE and 996 mb at 35.1N, 71.8W at 20 UTC 
(COA). "Near midnight on October 31, the American steamship W.H. Libby at latitude 
34 degrees 43 minutes north, longitude 69 degrees 16 minutes south, reporting southeast 
winds of force 8. The lowest barometer reading on this vessel was at 2 a.m. on November 1, 
when a corrected value of 29.58 inches [1002 mb] was indicated…During the night of 
November 1, however, it unexpectedly turned southwestward" (MWR).

November 2: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 995 mb near 32N, 75W. HURDAT listed 
this as a Category 1 hurricane at 32.2N, 75.7W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicates a 
pressure of 980 mb near 23.5N, 76W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest a position 
northeast of HURDAT to be most accurate. Ship highlights: calm winds and 980 mb central 
pressure at 33.5N, 74.7W at 06 UTC (MWR); 45 kt NNE and 992 mb at 33.5N, 74.7W at 09 UTC 
(COA); 35 kt W and 993 mb at 32.2N, 75W at 12 UTC (HWM). "Between the morning of 
November 1 and 2, and particularly during the night of the 1st, the storm center took a 
peculiar turn toward a more southerly course. The American steamship Iowan passed through 
the central calm area at about 2 a.m. on November 2, in 33 degrees 30 minutes north, 
74 degrees 42 minutes west, and reported a barometer reading of 28.94 inches [980 mb]. 
Just before passage through the calm, the wind had attained force 12 from the 
north-northeast and thereafter switched to force 12 from the southwest" (MWR).

November 3: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 28.5N, 77W. HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 1 hurricane at 29.5N, 76.1W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones 
indicates a pressure of 964 mb near 29N, 76.5W at 8 a.m. Available observations 
suggest a position southwest of HURDAT to be most accurate. Ship highlights: 
70 kt WSW at 27.7N, 76.5W at 12 UTC (MWR); 15 kt E and 964 mb at 27.7N, 76.5W at 
1330 UTC (MWR); 60 kt WSW and 964 mb at 27.6N, 76.6W at 14 UTC (MWR); 45 kt E and 
993 mb at 27.6N, 76.6W at 16 UTC (MWR). "…crossed the northern extremity of the 
Bahamas on the 3d…At 9:30 a.m. [of the 3rd] the British steamship Queen of Bermuda, 
about 75 miles north-northeast of Hopetown, Great Abaco Island, at 27 degrees 
41 minutes north, 76 degrees 32 minutes west, was in the hurricane center, with 
a barometer reading of 28.46 inches [964 mb], the lowest reported for the storm" (MWR).

November 4: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1000 mb near 26.5N, 78.5W. HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 1 hurricane at 26.5N, 78.7W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones 
indicates a pressure of 973 mb near 26N, 79W at 8 a.m. Available observations 
suggest a position southwest of HURDAT to be most accurate. Station highlights: 
58 kt NW and 975 mb at Miami at 17 UTC (OMR); 60 kt WNW and 973 mb at Miami at 
17 UTC (MWR); calm winds and 973 mb at Miami at 1745 UTC (OMR); 65 kt SE at Miami 
at 18 UTC (MWR); 70 kt E (Beaufort 12) and 977 at Fort Lauderdale at 21 UTC (MWR). 
Ship highlights: 50 kt NNE at 26.7N, 78.8W at 12 UTC (HWM); north to northeast winds 
and 973 mb at 25.9N, 79.5W at 16 UTC (MWR); 50 kt SW and 1001 mb at 25.3N, 80.1W at 
18 UTC (COA). "…and then passed southwesterly across the lower Florida peninsula 
into the gulf of Mexico on the 4th…A report from the American steamship Arizpa, 
Mobile to London, caught in the hurricane of the southeast coast of Florida, states 
that the barometer stood at 28.72 inches [973 mb] (corrected) from 11 a.m. until 
noon of the 4th, at and close to 25 degrees 55 minutes north, 79 degrees 55 minutes 
west, while hurricane velocities from north and northeast were experienced between 
10 a.m. and 1 p.m... The storm throughout its history was of comparatively small 
diameter, and its hurricane winds covered only a narrow band" (MWR).  "The eye of 
the storm passed over the city [Miami] at about noon on the 4th before tracking 
across the Everglades and into the Gulf of Mexico" (Barnes).  Dunn and Miller note 
the storm as "occurring in extreme south Florida on November 4th as a minimal 
hurricane with Miami's barometer reading 973 mb and winds of 75 mph."  Jarrell et 
al also noted this hurricane as a "Category 2 hurricane in southeast Florida with 
a 973 mb pressure."  Ho et al lists this storm as, "having a RMW of 10 nmi, a 
central pressure of 973 mb, and a landfall location of 25.9N, 80.1W."   "The total 
property loss in Miami and vicinity is estimated at $5,500,000. The total loss of 
life in Florida and Great Abaco Island is placed at 19" (MWR).

November 5: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1010 mb near 26N, 84W. HURDAT 
listed this as a Category 1 hurricane at 24.9N, 83.5W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones 
indicate the center near 26N, 84W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest a 
position northeast of HURDAT to be most accurate. Station highlights: 29 kt W 
and 1005 mb at Key West at 00 UTC (OMR). Ship highlights: 35 kt NNW and 1004 mb 
at 24.9N, 84W at 10 UTC (MWR); 70 kt ENE and 1002 mb at 26.6N, 83.5W at 17 UTC 
(MWR).  “In the east Gulf it formed an incomplete loop by first moving westward, 
then northward toward the Alabama coast, and finally eastward nearly to the 
central west coast of Florida” (MWR).

November 6: HWM analyzes an area of low environmental pressure, but not closed, 
near 25N, 85W with an approaching cold front from the northwest. Available 
observations disagree with this analysis and indicate that a circulation, however 
weak it appears (~1015 mb), is present around 25.5N, 75W. HURDAT listed this as a 
tropical storm at 26N, 86.3W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicate the center near 
26.5N, 85.5W at 8 a.m. Available observations suggest a position slightly northeast 
of HURDAT to be most accurate. Ship highlights: 45 kt N and 1008 mb at 25.8N, 85.7W 
at 09 UTC (MWR); 35 kt S and 1011 mb at 26.6N, 85.7W at 13 UTC (COA); 35 kt S and 
1009 mb at 27N, 86.2W at 17 UTC (MWR).

November 7: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1015 mb near 26N, 88W with a cold 
front propagating north of the circulation. HURDAT listed this as a tropical storm 
at 28N, 86.9W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicate the center near 28N, 86.5W at 
8 a.m. Available observations suggest a position slightly southwest of HURDAT to be 
most accurate. Ship highlights: 35 kt NE and 1012 mb at 27.9N, 87.2W at 00 UTC (COA).

November 8: HWM analyzed a cold front stretching from southwest to northeast such 
that no circulation exists and barotropic characteristics that where once present 
are no longer apparent. HURDAT listed this as a tropical depression at 27.6N, 
83.7W. The MWR Tracks of Cyclones indicate the center near 27N, 85W at 8 a.m. 
Available observations suggest a position west of HURDAT to be most accurate. 
No gale force winds (or equivalent in pressure) were observed.  “It did not 
reach this [west Florida] coast, but entirely disintegrated before 8 p. m. on 
November 8” (MWR).

Genesis is maintained for this hurricane on October 30th at 06 UTC.  Despite the 
HWM map series indicating a low pressure in association with an extended frontal 
boundary from the 25th to the 28th (but not on the 29th), a closed low could not 
be confirmed, as the structure observed is better described as a front or open 
trough.  An observation at Bermuda of 30 kt N and 1017 mb at 12 UTC on the 30th 
is consistent with the pre-existing 35 kt in HURDAT at that time.  Despite the 
Historical Weather Map showing the cyclone having frontal boundaries from the 
30th of October through the 1st of November, re-examination of the data indicate 
no significant temperature gradient, a relatively symmetric wind field, and 
strong winds near the center.  Thus the cyclone’s status as a tropical cyclone 
for the 30th to the 1st of November is maintained.  Minor alterations were made 
to the track for every day of its existence.  On the 31st at 05 UTC, a peripheral 
pressure observation of 1000 mb was indicated along with 35 kt WSW winds.  This 
pressure implies at least 44 kt from the Brown et al. north of 25N pressure-wind 
relationship. 45 kt at 06 UTC is maintained.  A peripheral pressure of 990 mb with 
simultaneous 60 kt E winds at 18 UTC on the 1st implies at least winds of 64 kt 
from the Brown et al north of 25N and at least 63 kt from the Landsea et al. north 
of 35N pressure-wind relationships. 70 kt at that time is maintained in HURDAT. On 
the 1st, the cyclone caused tropical storm force winds to occur along the North 
Carolina coast.  On the 2nd the storm’s motion took an irregular path from west 
toward the Carolinas to south toward the Bahamas. A central pressure of 980 mb at 
06 UTC on the 2nd was observed from a ship indicating winds of 73 kt from the 
north of 25N pressure-wind relationship. 75 kt is chosen for HURDAT, 5 kt higher 
than previously recorded. The hurricane was located north of the Bahamas on the 
3rd where several ship observations were available. A central pressure of 964 mb 
was reported shortly after 12 UTC on the 3rd, which implies winds of 91 and 95 kt 
from the north of 25N pressure-wind relationship and the subset relationship for 
intensifying systems.  90 kt is chosen for HURDAT at 12 UTC on the 3rd, 20 kt 
higher than the original estimate, which is a major intensity revision.  No 
significant observations were available from the Bahamas, though it is likely 
that the hurricane made landfall over Great Abaco early on the 4th as a 
Category 2 hurricane.

Landfall for the cyclone occurred around 18 UTC on the 4th at 25.9N 80.1W at Miami, 
Florida. On the 4th, a central pressure of 973 mb was observed at 18 UTC in Miami 
indicating winds of 81 kt from the north of 25N pressure-wind relationship and 
86 kt from the south of 25N pressure-wind relationship.  Highest observed 5 min winds 
were 65 kt SE at 1807 UTC in Miami after the eye passage. The small RMW of 10 nm 
estimated by Ho et al. is consistent with the description in MWR and is smaller than 
climatology (20 nm – Vickery et al) for this latitude and central pressure.  
Translational speed for the hurricane at landfall is about 11 kt, fairly close to 
climatology.  Thus, 85 kt is chosen for HURDAT. This new wind estimate is considerably 
higher than before (65 kt) but does confirm the Category 2 classification analyzed 
by Jarrell et al.  It is possible, given the uncertainties that this cyclone made 
landfall as a high end Category 1 (~80 kt), rather than a low end Category 2 (~85 kt).  
(Thus the intensity from 06 UTC on the 3rd through 18 UTC on the 4th had a major 
upward change.)  A run of the Kaplan-DeMaria inland wind decay model suggests winds 
of 69 kt at 00 UTC on the 5th.  Given the transit over the Everglades, intensity at 
this time is analyzed to be 70 kt, 5 kt higher than originally listed. Minimal gale 
force observations (35 kt) were seen for the 5th at Key West (00 UTC) although a wind 
of east-northeast at 70 kt was noted by the S.S. Horn Shell at 17 UTC. 65 kt is 
maintained for HURDAT at 12 UTC on the 5th. The system continued to diminish in 
intensity through the 5th and 6th even though the cyclone had moved over the Gulf 
of Mexico, downgrading the hurricane to a tropical storm at 00 UTC on the 6th. 
On the 6th, several ship observations contained gale force winds but relatively weak 
pressures (1008-1011 mb) with the highest wind of 45 kt at 09 UTC. 50 kt is chosen 
for HURDAT at 12 UTC on the 6th, 5 kt lower than previously estimated. A single wind 
observation of 35 kt early on the 7th amidst several measurements in the Gulf of Mexico 
indicates the storm is continued to weaken. The storm became a tropical depression at 
18 UTC on the 7th (unchanged) and transitioned to extratropical at 12 UTC on the 8th.  
This extratropical transition was not indicated in HURDAT previously, but is supported 
by the large temperature contrast across the weakening system by 12 UTC on the 8th.  
While somewhat ambiguous, it appears that a closed circulation still existed at 12 UTC 
on the 8th.  Dissipation after 18 UTC on the 8th is unchanged from that previously 
indicated.


Storm 8, 1935

28066 11/03/1935 M=12  8 SNBR= 620 NOT NAMED   XING=0 SSS=0
28066 11/03*340 615  30    0*345 605  30    0*350 595  30    0*356 583  35    0
28066 11/04*362 571  35    0*367 560  40    0*370 550  40    0*367 544  40    0
28066 11/05*362 541  40    0*356 539  40    0*350 540  40    0*342 548  40    0
28066 11/06*332 558  40    0*325 570  40    0*320 580  40    0*317 588  40    0
28066 11/07*317 596  40    0*317 603  40    0*315 610  40    0*309 616  40    0
28066 11/08*299 621  40    0*290 624  40    0*285 625  40    0*282 624  35    0
28066 11/09*281 622  35    0*280 619  30    0*280 615  30    0*280 609  30    0
28066 11/10*281 600  30    0*282 593  30    0*285 590  35    0*290 592  35    0
28066 11/11*295 597  40    0*299 605  40    0*300 615  40    0*296 622  40    0
28066 11/12*287 626  40    0*279 628  40    0*275 630  35    0*272 632  35    0
28066 11/13*270 634  35    0*269 636  30    0*270 635  30    0*275 631  30    0
28066 11/14*285 625  25    0*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0
28066 TS 

This is a new tropical storm not previously recorded in HURDAT. Evidence for this 
system comes from the Historical Weather Map series, the COADS ship database, and 
the Monthly Weather Review.

November 2:  HWM analyses a weak trough along 35N 55W to 25N 65W.  
No gale force winds or low pressures.

November 3: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 36N, 60W with a frontal 
system to the northwest of the storm stretching from northeast to southwest.  
Ship highlights:  30 kt N and 1010 mb at 36.2N 62.1W at 12 UTC (COA).

November 4: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1000 mb near 38N, 55W with the weak 
stationary front northwest of the system dissipating. Ship highlights: 30 kt SSW and 
1006 mb at 37.0N 54.7W at 12 UTC (COA); 25 kt S and 1001 mb at 37.2N, 54.5W at 12 UTC 
(COA); 10 kt SSW and 1005 mb at 40.1N, 53.6W at 13 UTC (COA).

November 5: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1010 mb near 34N, 54W. The previous 
frontal system to the northwest has dissipated as indicated by HWM. Ship highlights: 
30 kt N and 1013 mb at 34.5N  59.5W at 04 UTC (COA); 25 kt SSW and 1006 mb at 33.4N, 
52.6W at 12 UTC (COA).

November 6: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1010 mb near 33.5N, 58W. 
No gale force winds (or equivalent in pressure) were observed.

November 7: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1010 mb near 32.5N, 64W. A second 
frontal system is approaching from the northwest although not yet affecting the storm.  
Ship highlights:  30 kt N at 30.2N 63.9W at 12 UTC (COA).  
Land highlights:  35 kt N and 1010 mb at Bermuda (HWM).

November 8: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1010 mb near 27.5N, 63.5W. The system 
has become elongated northwest to southeast as indicated by HWM. 
Ship highlights: 25 kt W and 1006 mb at 27.5N, 62.5W at 12 UTC (COA).

November 9: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1010 mb near 30N, 60W with a frontal 
system present to the north-northwest. No gale force winds 
(or equivalent in pressure) were observed.

November 10: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1010 mb near 28N, 58.5W. The frontal 
boundary analyzed for the several days preceding has lifted off to the north causing 
the storm to become elongated northeast to southwest. No gale force winds 
(or equivalent in pressure) were observed.

November 11: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 30N, 62W. 
Ship highlights:  35 kt NE and 1015 mb at 33.5N 62.5W at 00 UTC (COA); 35 kt NE 
and 1014 mb at 32.5N 64.5W at 04 UTC (COA); 35 kt NE and 1013 mb at 32.5N 64.5W 
at 08 UTC (COA); 30 kt NNE and 1012 mb at 31.5N 63.5W at 12 UTC (COA); 15 kt N and 
1001 mb at 30N, 62.1W at 12 UTC (COA).

November 12: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1005 mb near 27N, 63W. 
Ship highlights: 5 WSW and 1006 mb at 23.5N, 63.5W at 08 UTC (COA); 30 kt NNE 
and 1008 mb at 31.5N 64.5W at 04 UTC (COA).

November 13: HWM indicates a closed low of at most 1010 mb near 26.5N, 63.5W. The 
system is weakening as the area of low pressure has becoming much broader than the 
previous days. Ship highlights: 20 kt N and 1006 mb at 24.8N, 67.5W at 00 UTC (COA).

November 14: HWM analyzed a closed low of at most 1010 mb near 31N, 61.5W which has 
become elongated northwest to southeast. HWM also indicates a third moderate frontal 
system is approaching from the north. Dissipation is said to occur by 00 UTC as 
no gale force winds (or equivalent in pressure) were observed.

Genesis for this tropical storm began on the early morning of November 3rd where 
evidence shows a closed circulation. Temperatures are cool (~70F) but relative 
uniform across the cyclone’s center.  It appears that the system became a tropical 
storm at 18 UTC on 3rd, based in part on 30 kt N winds observed at 12 UTC.  A 
peripheral pressure of 1001 mb was observed at 12 UTC on the 4th which suggests 
winds of at least 47 kt from the Landsea et al. north of 35N pressure-wind 
relationship. 40 kt is chosen for the intensity, given the cyclone’s large size 
and slow movement.   Observations on the 5th and the 6th were limited and 40 kt 
is maintained for the intensity.  On the 7th, a ship observed 30 kt N winds and 
Bermuda reported 25 kt N winds and 1010 mb pressure.  The intensity is maintained 
at 40 kt. While the observations are only moderately comprehensive on the 8th to 
the 10th, it does appear that the cyclone weakened.  It is estimated that it 
dropped to a tropical depression around 06 UTC on the 9th and remained at this 
status until late on the 10th.  The cyclone appeared to have a second peak in 
intensity as three 35 kt gales were reported on the 11th along with 1001 mb 
peripheral pressure.  Such pressure suggests winds of at least 42 kt from the 
Brown et al north of 25N pressure-wind relationship. 40 kt is chosen for HURDAT 
as again the system is large and still slow moving.  On the 12th and 13th, the 
system again weakened and became very large (diameter of ~ 15 degrees north-south, 
~12 degrees east-west).  It likely became a tropical depression around 06 UTC on 
the 13th.  The system finally dissipated after 00 UTC on the 14th.  It is likely 
that such a cyclone monitored during the satellite era would have been characterized 
as a subtropical storm for much of its lifetime.  Additionally, the weakening 
apparent on the 9th of November and again on the 13th-14th suggests that it may 
have dropped below tropical cyclone status and have become a remnant Low on those 
dates.  The first usage of “Low” in the Atlantic best track is very recent – Arlene 
in 1987.  The key criterion that is utilized to differentiate tropical cyclones from 
remnant lows is the presence of organized deep convection.  Given that we are unable 
to examine this aspect in the pre-satellite era, it is not be appropriate to use the 
“Low” designation for this case.  

*******************************************************************************

1935 - Additional Notes:

1)  Historical Weather Maps and COADS indicate that a low pressure area formed 
in the northern Gulf of Mexico on 23 August 1935 and appeared to be a tropical 
cyclone in structure.  The system remained nearly stationary for the next four 
days without much change in intensity.  On the 28th, the system moved to the 
northeast and made landfall in the panhandle of Florida as a tropical depression. 
 \On the next day, it continued moving  toward the northeast and decayed over Georgia.  
Strongest observed winds were 30 kt from a ship on the 23rd (COA) and lowest observed 
pressure was 1008 mb from a ship on the 25th (HWM).  Thus available data indicate that 
this system was a tropical depression and is not included into HURDAT.  However, it 
is possible that it did obtain minimal tropical storm status.

DAY      LAT  LON     STATUS
Aug. 23  27N  88W     Tropical Depression
Aug. 24  26N  89W     Tropical Depression
Aug. 25  27N  88W     Tropical Depression
Aug. 26  28N  88W     Tropical Depression
Aug. 27  29N  89W     Tropical Depression
Aug. 28  30N  87W     Tropical Depression
Aug. 29  32N  83W     Tropical Depression Dissipating

2)  September 23-26:  In the MWR article on storm #6, there is mention of a minor 
disturbance over the Caribbean Sea from September 23-26 (the article gives the month 
incorrectly) that eventually merged with the hurricane.  The report states this 
system caused local gales in Puerto Rico and southern Santo Domingo.  MWR, HWM, and 
COADS observations indicate that the system did not obtain a closed circulation and 
remained a tropical wave moving across the Caribbean before being absorbed by the 
hurricane.  Strongest observations obtained were 25 kt.  As it did not have a closed 
circulation and that the gale force winds were not confirmed, this system is not 
added into HURDAT.

DAY      LAT  LON     STATUS
Sep. 23  ---   60W    Trough
Sep. 24  ---   64W    Trough
Sep. 25  ---   68W    Trough
Sep. 26  ---   71W    Trough

3) September 30-October 2:  The Monthly Weather Review, Historical Weather Maps, and 
COADS observations indicate a trough or possible tropical depression meandered near 
western Cuba from September 30 to October 2.  No winds greater than 25 kt were recorded. 
It is unlikely that this reached tropical storm intensity and is thus not added into HURDAT.

DAY      LAT  LON     STATUS
Sep. 30  22N  86W     Tropical Depression or Trough
Oct.  1  22N  85W     Tropical Depression or Trough
Oct.  2  23N  82W     Tropical Depression or Trough

4) October 2-5:  The HWM shows a low over the eastern tropical Atlantic on 2 October with 
pressures analyzed to be below 1005 mb.  The HWM analyze a nearly stationary and weakening 
low in this area for the next three days.  HWM, COADS, and MWR data indicate that the highest 
observed wind was 30 kt and lowest pressure was 1006 mb, both on the 2nd.  The system likely 
was at least a tropical depression and may have been a tropical storm.  But without direct 
evidence of tropical storm intensity, this system is not added into HURDAT.

DAY      LAT  LON     STATUS
Oct. 2     11N  22W     Tropical Depression
Oct. 3     11N  24W     Tropical Depression
Oct. 4     13N  24W     Tropical Depression?
Oct. 5     13N  24W     Tropical Depression?

5) November 24-25:  The Monthly Weather Review wrote:  “From the southwestern Caribbean Sea, 
there is a lone report of a localized storm lasting several hours, met on the 24th and 25th 
by the Dutch steamship Odysseus, Puerto Cortez toward Cristobal.  At the greatest intensity, 
the force was estimated as 11, lowest pressure 29.66 inches [1005 mb].  There is no further 
information at hand regarding this disturbance.”  Obtaining the Historical Weather Maps, 
COADS ship data and the MWR information provides a somewhat ambiguous picture.  The western 
Caribbean was swept by a strong cold front on the 23rd and 24th of November, as the temperatures 
were 40 F in Tampa, 52 F in Progresso, Mexico, and 60 F in western Cuba on the 24th.  Strong cold 
air advection was occurring along the east coast of Central America on both dates, which in itself 
would suggest that a tropical cyclone did not occur.  However, the presence of a closed circulation 
on the 25th (and possibly the 24th) in the southwestern Caribbean and the 1005 mb/60 kt NNE 
observations from the ship suggest that some type of cyclonic system did exist.  However, none 
of the other observations ever indicated more than 25 kt occurred.  It is judged that the system was 
caused by a combination of forcing from cold air advection and funneling along the east coast of 
Central America.  Thus it is likely not a tropical cyclone (or a subtropical cyclone) and 
thus is not added into HURDAT.

DAY      LAT  LON     STATUS
Nov. 24  12N  80W  Non-tropical low
Nov. 25  12N  82W  Non-tropical low