*******************************************************************************
1901
*******************************************************************************
1901/01
15150 06/10/1901 M= 5 1 SNBR= 359 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
15150 06/11/1901 M= 5 1 SNBR= 378 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
** ***
15155 06/10*171 822 35 0*179 827 35 0*187 830 35 0*195 832 35 0
(10th is removed from the revised HURDAT.)
15160 06/11*204 835 35 0*212 837 35 0*219 840 35 0*226 843 35 0
15160 06/11*193 823 25 0*200 830 25 0*207 835 30 0*214 839 30 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15165 06/12*233 846 35 0*240 849 35 0*247 852 35 0*254 856 35 0
15165 06/12*221 843 35 0*229 847 35 0*240 850 35 0*251 852 35 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15170 06/13*262 860 35 0*269 864 35 0*276 868 35 0*283 871 35 0
15170 06/13*261 852 35 0*274 850 35 0*285 847 35 0*295 846 35 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15175 06/14*290 874 35 0*297 877 35 0*304 880 35 0*313 883 35 0
15175 06/14*305 847 30 0*315 848 30 0*325 850 25 0*338 854 25 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
(15th is new to HURDAT.)
15177 06/15*349 862 25 0*359 870 25 0*370 880 25 0*385 897 25 0
15180 TS
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made large alterations
to the track and intensity from that shown in Neumann et al. (1999). These
track and intensity changes are found to be reasonable. Winds reduced to
tropical depression status on 11th, since observations indicate that tropical
storm status was not reached until the 12th. Inland decay model of
Kaplan and DeMaria (1995) utilized for inland winds over the southeast U.S.
********************************************************************************
1901/02
15185 07/02/1901 M= 9 2 SNBR= 360 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
15185 07/01/1901 M=10 2 SNBR= 379 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
** ** ***
(1st is new to HURDAT.)
15187 07/01* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 90 540 35 0* 95 550 35 0
15190 07/02* 0 0 0 0*132 575 35 0*131 590 35 0*130 607 35 0
15190 07/02*102 562 35 0*108 574 35 0*115 587 35 0*123 601 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15195 07/03*130 624 35 0*130 640 40 0*131 657 40 0*132 674 40 0
15195 07/03*132 619 35 0*142 636 40 0*153 657 40 0*159 674 40 0
*** *** *** *** *** ***
15200 07/04*133 690 45 0*135 706 50 0*137 720 55 0*140 732 55 0
15200 07/04*163 692 45 0*166 708 50 0*170 725 55 0*174 736 55 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15205 07/05*142 742 60 0*145 752 60 0*149 762 60 0*154 774 60 0
15205 07/05*178 746 60 0*183 755 60 0*187 765 60 0*189 774 60 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15210 07/06*159 787 55 0*164 799 55 0*170 810 55 0*176 820 50 0
15210 07/06*192 783 60 0*194 793 60 0*197 803 60 0*201 810 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15215 07/07*181 829 50 0*187 838 50 0*193 846 50 0*199 854 45 0
15215 07/07*206 819 60 0*210 826 60 0*215 835 60 0*219 843 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15220 07/08*206 862 45 0*213 870 45 0*220 878 45 0*227 884 45 0
15220 07/08*222 850 60 0*226 859 60 0*230 870 60 0*235 879 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15225 07/09*235 894 45 0*243 903 45 0*251 912 40 0*260 924 40 0
15225 07/09*241 887 60 0*248 896 60 0*253 905 60 0*260 919 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** **
15230 07/10*269 938 40 0*279 952 40 0*289 965 35 0*300 978 30 0
15230 07/10*269 935 55 0*279 950 50 0*289 965 35 0*300 978 30 0
*** ** *** **
15235 TS
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made large alterations
to the track shown in Neumann et al. (1999). Winds boosted from the 6th to
the 10th based upon 60 kt ship observation on the 9th. A 4' storm tide was
reported in Galveston, Texas (Connor 1956).
********************************************************************************
1901/03
15240 07/05/1901 M= 9 3 SNBR= 361 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=1
15240 07/04/1901 M=10 3 SNBR= 380 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=1
** ** ***
(4th is new to HURDAT.)
15242 07/04* 95 555 30 0*102 558 30 0*110 563 30 0*118 570 30 0
15245 07/05* 0 0 0 0*136 600 35 0*141 608 35 0*146 617 35 0
15245 07/05*125 578 35 0*132 587 35 0*137 597 35 0*144 608 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15250 07/06*150 625 35 0*155 633 40 0*159 641 45 0*163 648 50 0
15250 07/06*150 619 35 0*155 630 40 0*159 641 45 0*166 651 50 0
*** *** *** ***
15255 07/07*168 655 60 0*172 661 65 0*177 668 70 0*189 680 75 0
15255 07/07*174 663 55 0*182 676 60 0*190 690 60 0*200 702 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15260 07/08*205 697 80 0*222 715 80 0*238 730 85 0*254 742 85 0
15260 07/08*213 713 60 0*228 722 60 0*245 733 60 0*264 745 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15265 07/09*269 752 85 0*285 757 85 0*300 756 85 0*314 748 85 0
15265 07/09*277 758 60 0*290 766 60 0*305 767 60 0*318 759 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15270 07/10*326 740 85 0*336 738 85 0*345 737 85 0*352 739 85 0
15270 07/10*330 751 65 0*337 742 70 0*346 738 70 0*357 738 70 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15275 07/11*356 741 80 0*360 750 75 0*356 762 65 0*353 764 50 0
15275 07/11*361 746 70 0*361 756 70 0*356 762 60 0*353 764 50 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** **
15280 07/12*347 766 40 0*342 768 40 0*340 771 35 0*339 776 35 0
15285 07/13*338 781 35 0*338 788 35 0*338 795 35 0*339 802 30 0
15285 07/13*340 781 35 0*342 788 35 0*345 795 35 0*348 802 30 0
*** *** *** ***
15290 HR NC1
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made reasonable small
alterations to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999). Winds
are reduced from the 7th to the 11th, since observations indicate that the
system did not obtain hurricane force until about the 10th. Additionally,
there is no evidence for the system attaining more than a Category 1 hurricane
status, thus peak winds are reduced from 85 kt down to 70 kt. Landfall
as a Category 1 hurricane in the U.S. as reported in Table 6 of Neumann
et al. (1999)/U.S. hurricane characterization in HURDAT is retained. The
storm is known as "San Cirilo" for its impacts in Puerto Rico.
********************************************************************************
1901/04
15295 08/04/1901 M=15 4 SNBR= 362 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=2
15295 08/02/1901 M=17 4 SNBR= 381 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=1
** ** *** *
(2nd and 3rd are new to HURDAT.)
15296 08/02*326 384 25 0*323 391 25 0*320 400 25 0*316 411 25 0
15298 08/03*311 423 25 0*305 437 25 0*300 450 25 0*293 463 25 0
15300 08/04* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*264 495 35 0*263 516 35 0
15300 08/04*286 473 30 0*277 488 30 0*270 500 30 0*263 516 30 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** **
15305 08/05*261 535 35 0*258 553 35 0*257 569 35 0*256 583 35 0
15305 08/05*256 532 30 0*249 548 30 0*245 565 30 0*242 579 30 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15310 08/06*256 596 35 0*255 609 35 0*254 623 35 0*253 639 35 0
15310 08/06*239 593 30 0*237 608 30 0*237 623 30 0*239 639 30 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** ** *** **
15315 08/07*252 656 35 0*250 673 35 0*249 688 35 0*249 702 40 0
15315 08/07*242 657 30 0*246 675 30 0*250 690 30 0*253 702 30 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** **
15320 08/08*248 714 40 0*248 725 40 0*248 734 40 0*249 743 40 0
15320 08/08*255 716 30 0*255 727 30 0*255 740 30 0*254 745 30 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15325 08/09*250 750 40 0*250 756 40 0*252 764 40 0*253 771 40 0
15325 08/09*250 750 35 0*250 756 35 0*252 764 40 0*253 771 40 0
** **
15330 08/10*254 778 40 0*256 784 40 0*258 790 40 0*261 796 40 0
15335 08/11*264 803 40 0*267 809 35 0*269 815 35 0*270 821 40 0
15335 08/11*264 804 35 0*267 813 35 0*269 821 40 0*270 827 45 0
*** ** *** *** ** *** **
15340 08/12*272 828 45 0*273 835 55 0*274 842 65 0*274 850 70 0
15340 08/12*272 832 50 0*273 837 55 0*274 842 65 0*274 848 70 0
*** ** *** ***
15345 08/13*275 859 75 0*275 868 80 0*275 876 80 0*276 884 85 0
15345 08/13*275 854 75 0*275 860 80 0*275 867 80 0*276 876 80 0
*** *** *** *** **
15350 08/14*278 890 85 0*279 895 85 0*281 897 85 0*284 898 85 0
15350 08/14*279 887 80 0*283 893 80 0*287 897 80 0*291 898 80 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** ** *** **
15355 08/15*288 898 80 0*293 897 75 0*299 895 65 973*305 892 50 0
15355 08/15*294 895 80 0*297 892 80 0*300 890 80 0*305 887 70 973
*** *** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** *** ** ***
15360 08/16*311 890 40 0*318 889 35 0E326 892 35 0E335 895 30 0
15360 08/16*310 883 60 0*315 881 45 0*320 880 40 0*330 887 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** **** *** ** **** *** **
2
15365 08/17E344 898 30 0E354 900 30 0E363 899 25 0E371 893 25 0
15365 08/17E340 895 30 0E350 900 30 0E363 899 25 0E371 893 25 0
*** *** ***
15370 08/18E378 887 25 0E384 878 25 0E390 868 25 0E398 854 25 0
15375 HR LA2 MS2
15375 HR LA1 MS1 AL1
*** *** ***
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made large alterations
to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999). These track
and intensity changes are found to be reasonable. Analysis of 973 mb
central pressure from Ho et al. (1987) is based upon a peripheral
pressure of 993 mb from Mobile along with an estimated 33 nmi radius of
maximum wind. (This analysis of central pressure was very similar to the
estimation in Jarrell et al. (1992) taken from Connor (1956) of 972 mb.)
A 973 mb central pressure suggests 85 kt from the Gulf of Mexico
wind-pressure relationship. Given that this radius of maximum wind is
larger than climatological value (of 23 nmi for this latitude and
central pressure - Vickery et al. 2000), a maximum sustained windspeed
of 80 kt is chosen at landfall making this system a Category 1 hurricane.
This is a downgrade from the Category 2 at U.S. landfall reported in
Table 6 of Neumann et al. (1999)/U.S. hurricane characterization in
HURDAT. Winds from the 13th to the 15th adjusted accordingly. Winds
increased on the 16th based upon observed wind reports for the day. Storm
tides of 8' were observed in Port Eads, Louisiana and Mobile, Alabama
(Connor 1956, Cline 1926).
********************************************************************************
1901/05
15376 08/18/1901 M= 5 5 SNBR= 382 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
15377 08/18* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*115 530 30 0*116 540 30 0
15378 08/19*117 548 30 0*119 557 30 0*120 567 35 0*121 577 35 0
15379 08/20*122 586 40 0*122 595 40 0*123 603 45 0*123 612 45 0
15380 08/21*124 622 40 0*124 633 35 0*125 645 30 0*126 658 30 0
15381 08/22*126 671 25 0*126 683 25 0*127 695 25 0*128 710 25 0
15382 TS
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997) for this newly documented
tropical storm.
********************************************************************************
1901/06
15380 08/30/1901 M=13 5 SNBR= 363 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
15380 08/29/1901 M=14 6 SNBR= 383 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
** ** * ***
(29th new to HURDAT.)
15383 08/29* 0 0 0 0*136 224 30 0*137 240 35 0*139 259 35 0
15385 08/30*141 360 50 0*142 372 50 0*145 380 55 0*147 387 60 0
15385 08/30*141 274 40 0*142 288 40 0*143 302 45 0*144 315 45 0
*** ** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15390 08/31*149 395 65 0*152 404 70 0*156 414 70 0*160 426 75 0
15390 08/31*145 330 50 0*147 345 50 0*150 363 55 0*151 377 55 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15395 09/01*165 440 80 0*171 453 80 0*176 462 85 0*181 470 85 0
15395 09/01*154 390 60 0*157 404 60 0*163 420 65 0*168 432 65 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15400 09/02*185 474 85 0*190 480 85 0*195 486 85 0*200 492 85 0
15400 09/02*174 446 70 0*180 460 70 0*185 475 75 0*189 488 75 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15405 09/03*206 498 90 0*212 504 90 0*219 510 95 0*227 517 95 0
15405 09/03*192 501 80 0*196 514 80 0*200 527 85 0*207 542 85 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15410 09/04*237 526 100 0*246 535 100 0*255 543 105 0*262 550 105 0
15410 09/04*215 556 90 0*226 570 90 0*240 580 90 0*250 584 90 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15415 09/05*268 557 105 0*275 564 105 0*282 570 105 0*290 576 100 0
15415 09/05*261 587 90 0*271 589 90 0*280 590 90 0*288 591 90 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15420 09/06*298 581 95 0*307 585 90 0*315 587 85 0*323 583 85 0
15420 09/06*295 592 90 0*301 591 90 0*307 590 85 0*316 586 85 0
*** *** ** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15425 09/07*330 578 85 0*336 570 85 0*342 561 85 0*347 553 85 0
15425 09/07*326 578 85 0*336 570 85 0*342 561 85 0*347 553 85 0
***
15430 09/08*352 540 85 0*356 519 80 0*358 500 80 0*360 475 80 0
15430 09/08*352 540 85 0*356 520 80 0*358 500 80 0*360 475 80 0
***
15435 09/09*360 444 80 0*362 413 80 0*370 390 80 0*381 381 75 0
15435 09/09*360 444 80 0*362 413 80 0*370 390 80 0*381 374 75 0
***
15440 09/10*397 377 70 0*415 379 70 0E431 378 65 0E445 368 65 0
15440 09/10*395 357 70 0*410 338 70 0*430 320 65 0*444 309 65 0
*** *** *** *** **** *** **** ***
15445 09/11E469 325 55 0E480 290 45 0E486 250 40 0E492 200 35 0
15445 09/11E458 293 55 0E473 277 45 0E486 250 40 0E492 200 35 0
*** *** *** ***
15450 HR
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made large alterations
to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999), originally
storm number 5. These track and intensity changes are found to be
reasonable. A 991 mb peripheral pressure on 12Z of the 8th supports
winds of at least 62 kt from the northern wind-pressure relationship - winds
maintained at 80 kt. Peak winds are reduced from 105 kt down to 90 kt, since
observations available support only a Category 1 hurricane, or Category 2
hurricane at most. Winds reduced from the 1st to the 6th accordingly.
********************************************************************************
1901/07
15455 09/09/1901 M=11 6 SNBR= 364 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
15455 09/09/1901 M=11 7 SNBR= 384 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
* ***
15460 09/09* 0 0 0 0*188 493 35 0*186 504 35 0*184 518 35 0
15460 09/09* 0 0 0 0*176 507 35 0*175 520 35 0*175 532 35 0
*** *** *** *** *** ***
15465 09/10*184 532 35 0*183 546 35 0*183 560 35 0*182 574 35 0
15465 09/10*174 546 35 0*174 560 35 0*173 573 35 0*174 588 35 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15470 09/11*182 587 35 0*181 600 40 0*182 614 40 0*183 630 40 0
15470 09/11*175 601 35 0*176 613 40 0*178 627 45 0*181 643 50 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** ** *** *** **
15475 09/12*185 647 40 0*186 665 40 0*186 682 40 0*188 698 35 0
15475 09/12*184 656 50 0*185 669 50 0*186 682 50 0*187 696 40 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** ** *** *** **
15480 09/13*190 714 35 0*192 730 35 0*194 742 35 0*197 757 40 0
15480 09/13*188 710 35 0*189 726 35 0*190 743 45 0*191 757 50 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** ** *** **
15485 09/14*199 770 40 0*201 783 45 0*204 796 45 0*208 809 50 0
15485 09/14*192 770 55 0*194 783 60 0*197 795 65 0*201 806 65 0
*** ** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15490 09/15*214 822 50 0*221 834 50 0*228 847 50 0*234 857 50 0
15490 09/15*205 819 70 0*210 833 70 0*215 845 70 0*220 856 65 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15495 09/16*240 864 50 0*245 869 50 0*251 875 50 0*257 880 50 0
15495 09/16*226 865 60 0*233 873 55 0*243 880 50 0*253 885 50 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** *** ***
15500 09/17*263 883 50 0*270 885 50 0*278 887 45 0*289 882 45 0
15500 09/17*265 885 50 0*277 881 50 0*290 875 50 0*303 867 50 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** ** *** *** **
15505 09/18*302 873 40 0*316 850 35 0E330 812 35 0E342 770 35 0
15505 09/18*316 853 40 0*325 834 35 0*330 812 35 0*342 770 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** * *
15510 09/19E358 742 35 0E371 725 35 0E387 700 35 0E405 672 35 0
15510 09/19E358 742 40 0E371 725 45 0E387 700 50 0E405 672 50 0
** ** ** **
15515 TS
15515 HR
**
The only major change from Partagas and Diaz (1997) is to upgrade the storm
to a hurricane in the vicinity of Cuba. Partagas and Diaz otherwise made
reasonable small alterations to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et
al. (1999), originally storm number 6. This upgrade to a hurricane is
based upon the re-analysis work of Perez (2000), which analyzed the storm as
a Category 1 hurricane in the vicinity of Cuba. Winds are increased
accordingly on the 13th to the 16th. A peripheral pressure of 1001 mb (06Z
on the 12th) suggests winds of at least 45 kt from the southern wind-pressure
relationship - 50 kt used in best track. Winds adjusted accordingly on the
11th and 12th. The storm is known as "San Leoncio" or "San Vicente IV" for
its impacts in Puerto Rico.
********************************************************************************
1901/08
15520 09/12/1901 M= 6 7 SNBR= 365 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
15520 09/12/1901 M= 6 8 SNBR= 385 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
* ***
15525 09/12*111 281 35 0*115 285 35 0*121 289 35 0*127 291 35 0
15530 09/13*133 294 35 0*138 295 35 0*143 296 35 0*148 296 35 0
15530 09/13*133 294 40 0*138 295 40 0*143 296 45 0*148 296 45 0
** ** ** **
15535 09/14*153 296 35 0*158 294 40 0*162 292 40 0*166 291 40 0
15535 09/14*153 296 50 0*158 294 50 0*162 292 50 0*166 291 50 0
** ** ** **
15540 09/15*170 290 40 0*174 290 35 0*178 292 35 0*181 294 35 0
15540 09/15*170 290 45 0*174 290 40 0*178 292 35 0*181 294 35 0
** **
15545 09/16*184 298 35 0*186 302 35 0*189 307 35 0*191 309 35 0
15550 09/17*194 311 35 0*198 314 35 0*202 316 35 0*208 320 30 0
15555 TS
Partagas and Diaz (1997) introduced no changes to the track shown in
Neumann et al. (1999), originally storm number 7. However, ship reports
indicate that the storm was somewhat stronger than originally indicated
in HURDAT. Winds increased on the 13th to the 15th accordingly.
********************************************************************************
1901/09
15560 09/21/1901 M=12 8 SNBR= 366 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
15560 09/21/1901 M=12 9 SNBR= 386 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
* ***
15565 09/21*110 802 35 0*115 804 35 0*120 806 35 0*125 808 35 0
15565 09/21*137 730 35 0*138 740 35 0*140 750 35 0*142 759 35 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15570 09/22*130 810 35 0*135 813 35 0*140 815 35 0*146 817 35 0
15570 09/22*144 769 35 0*147 780 35 0*150 790 35 0*152 798 35 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15575 09/23*151 820 35 0*157 822 35 0*163 825 35 0*168 828 35 0
15575 09/23*155 806 35 0*159 813 35 0*165 820 35 0*169 823 35 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15580 09/24*173 831 35 0*178 834 35 0*183 837 35 0*189 840 35 0
15580 09/24*174 825 35 0*180 828 35 0*185 830 35 0*188 832 35 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15585 09/25*194 843 35 0*201 846 35 0*207 849 40 0*213 852 40 0
15585 09/25*192 833 35 0*196 834 35 0*200 835 40 0*203 837 40 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15590 09/26*220 853 40 0*228 854 45 0*238 855 45 0*250 855 45 0
15590 09/26*207 838 40 0*211 839 45 0*215 840 45 0*221 842 45 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15595 09/27*263 853 40 0*275 851 40 0*288 848 40 0*300 843 40 0
15595 09/27*232 845 40 0*243 848 40 0*255 850 40 0*270 849 40 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15600 09/28*312 839 40 0*325 835 40 0E337 830 35 0E354 823 35 0
15600 09/28*288 847 40 0*306 845 35 0E325 840 35 0E351 827 35 0
*** *** *** *** ** *** *** *** ***
15605 09/29E378 814 30 0E403 801 25 0E425 786 25 0E442 765 25 0
15610 09/30E457 745 25 0E470 725 25 0E480 674 25 0E482 639 30 0
15610 09/30E457 745 25 0E470 725 25 0E480 685 25 0E482 639 30 0
***
15615 10/01E482 601 30 0E483 559 35 0E485 515 35 0E490 461 40 0
15620 10/02E508 394 40 0E531 326 45 0E553 270 45 0* 0 0 0 0
15625 TS
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made large alterations to
the track shown in Neumann et al. (1999), originally storm number 8. These
track changes are found to be reasonable. Track adjusted slightly on the
30th to allow for a more realistic translational velocity.
********************************************************************************
1901/10
15630 10/07/1901 M= 8 9 SNBR= 367 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
15630 10/05/1901 M=10 10 SNBR= 387 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
** ** ** ***
(The 5th and 6th are new to HURDAT.)
15632 10/05*120 515 35 0*122 517 35 0*125 520 35 0*127 523 35 0
15634 10/06*130 526 40 0*132 529 40 0*135 533 40 0*138 537 45 0
15635 10/07*147 508 35 0*148 520 35 0*150 531 35 0*151 542 35 0
15635 10/07*142 541 50 0*146 545 55 0*150 550 60 0*155 556 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15640 10/08*153 554 35 0*155 567 35 0*158 581 35 0*161 597 35 0
15640 10/08*162 567 60 0*169 576 60 0*175 585 55 0*184 596 50 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15645 10/09*165 615 35 0*172 634 35 0*178 650 35 0*185 662 35 0
15645 10/09*194 606 45 0*202 614 40 0*210 623 35 0*218 637 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** *** ***
15650 10/10*193 675 35 0*204 689 35 0*220 700 35 0*240 702 35 0
15650 10/10*227 655 35 0*240 670 35 0*256 685 35 0*277 690 35 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15655 10/11*261 689 40 0*281 670 40 0*302 651 45 0*323 638 45 0
15655 10/11E303 685 40 0E330 672 40 0E350 650 45 0E358 638 45 0
**** *** **** *** **** *** ****
15660 10/12*346 625 45 0*366 613 40 0E381 600 35 0E392 587 35 0
15660 10/12E365 625 45 0E373 613 40 0E381 600 35 0E392 587 35 0
**** ****
15665 10/13E402 570 35 0E411 556 35 0E420 541 35 0E430 516 35 0
15670 10/14E439 484 35 0E449 444 35 0E458 400 35 0* 0 0 0 0
15675 TS
The only major change from Partagas and Diaz (1997) is to provide a more
realistic position on the 5th. The Partagas and Diaz position on the 5th
required a motion toward the northeast, which is not supported by climatology
or available ship observations. Partagas and Diaz otherwise made large
though reasonable alterations to the track and intensity from that shown in
Neumann et al. (1999), originally storm number 9. Winds increased from the
7th to the 9th based upon ship reports in Partagas and Diaz.
********************************************************************************
1901/11
15676 10/15/1901 M= 4 11 SNBR= 388 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
15677 10/15*210 800 30 0*215 793 30 0*220 785 30 0*225 777 35 0
15678 10/16*229 767 40 0*233 758 45 0*237 750 50 0*243 737 50 0
15679 10/17*252 724 50 0*258 711 50 0*265 695 45 0*269 684 40 0
15679 10/18*273 672 40 0E276 661 40 0E280 650 40 0E284 637 40 0
15679 TS
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997) for this newly documented
tropical storm.
********************************************************************************
1901/12
15680 10/31/1901 M= 7 10 SNBR= 368 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
15680 10/30/1901 M= 8 12 SNBR= 389 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
** * ** ***
(The 30th is new to HURDAT.)
15682 10/30* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*193 673 30 0*205 672 30 0
15685 10/31* 0 0 0 0*217 688 35 0*225 680 35 0*235 672 35 0
15685 10/31*217 671 35 0*229 669 35 0*240 667 35 0*247 664 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15690 11/01*243 665 35 0*251 659 35 0*258 653 40 0*263 648 40 0
15690 11/01*254 661 40 0*261 657 45 0*267 653 50 0*274 649 55 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15695 11/02*268 644 45 0*273 639 45 0*278 634 45 0*284 628 50 0
15695 11/02*280 646 55 0*286 642 60 0*293 635 60 0*296 628 65 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** **
15700 11/03*290 622 50 0*297 616 50 0*305 610 50 0*313 604 50 0
15700 11/03*300 620 70 0*305 611 70 0*312 603 70 0*324 591 70 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15705 11/04*322 599 50 0*331 594 50 0*340 590 50 0*351 585 50 0
15705 11/04*340 581 65 0*356 571 60 0*368 563 55 0*374 557 50 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** ***
15710 11/05*364 578 50 0*374 565 50 0*378 550 45 0*380 538 45 0
15710 11/05*379 555 50 0*383 550 50 0*385 545 45 0*383 534 45 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15715 11/06*381 525 40 0*381 512 40 0*381 500 35 0*383 485 30 0
15715 11/06E378 525 40 0E373 515 40 0E370 505 35 0E370 492 30 0
**** **** *** **** *** **** ***
15720 TS
15720 HR
**
The major change from Partagas and Diaz (1997) is to upgrade the storm to a
hurricane. A peripheral pressure of 989 mb (12Z on the 3rd) suggests winds
of at least 65 kt from the subtropical wind-pressure relationship - 70 kt
chosen for the best track. Partagas and Diaz otherwise made reasonable
small alterations to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999),
originally storm number 10. A peripheral pressure of 1001 mb (12Z on
the 1st) suggests winds of at least 45 kt from the southern wind-
pressure relationship - 50 kt chosen for the best track. Winds changed
accordingly from the 1st to the 4th based upon these measurements.
*******************************************************************************
1901 - Additional Notes:
Partagas and Diaz (1997) mentioned one additional system considered
for inclusion into HURDAT. The re-analysis team agreed to leave it out
of HURDAT for the following reason:
1) October 5, 1901: One gale force report, insufficient to determine if
system was tropical storm intensity.
*******************************************************************************
1902
*******************************************************************************
1902/01
15725 06/10/1902 M= 7 1 SNBR= 369 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
15725 06/12/1902 M= 6 1 SNBR= 390 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
** * ***
15730 06/10* 0 0 0 0*134 817 35 0*138 819 35 0*141 821 35 0
15735 06/11*144 823 35 0*150 826 35 0*158 828 35 0*168 831 35 0
(The 10th and 11th are removed from HURDAT.)
15740 06/12*178 834 35 0*189 837 35 0*201 840 35 0*213 843 35 0
15740 06/12* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*177 840 30 0*191 836 30 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15745 06/13*226 845 35 0*238 847 40 0*250 848 40 0*262 848 45 0
15745 06/13*207 833 35 0*222 831 40 0*238 830 45 0*249 832 50 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** ** *** *** **
15750 06/14*275 847 45 0*287 845 45 0*299 841 40 0*306 838 30 0
15750 06/14*259 835 50 0*269 838 50 0*280 840 50 0*290 839 50 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15755 06/15*312 835 25 0*320 832 25 0*331 825 25 0*336 821 25 0
15755 06/15*300 836 45 0*310 832 40 0*320 825 35 0*330 817 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15760 06/16E344 814 25 0E352 807 25 0E360 798 25 0E370 780 25 0
15760 06/16*340 807 35 0*352 795 35 0E367 780 40 0E386 749 40 0
**** *** ** * *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
(The 17th is new to HURDAT.)
15762 06/17E419 715 35 0E450 682 35 0E475 660 30 0E494 640 30 0
15765 TS
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made large alterations to
the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999). These track and
intensity changes are found to be reasonable. Winds increased slightly from
the 13th to the 16th based upon ship and coastal observations.
********************************************************************************
1902/02
15770 06/19/1902 M=10 2 SNBR= 370 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
15770 06/21/1902 M= 9 2 SNBR= 391 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
** ** ***
15775 06/19* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*170 850 35 0*173 858 35 0
15780 06/20*175 866 40 0*177 873 40 0*181 880 40 0*183 885 35 0
(The 19th and 20th are removed from HURDAT.)
15785 06/21*185 890 35 0*187 895 35 0*189 899 35 0*192 907 35 0
15785 06/21*172 921 25 0*176 924 25 0*180 927 25 0*182 929 25 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15790 06/22*195 915 35 0*197 922 35 0*199 928 40 0*202 932 40 0
15790 06/22*184 930 30 0*187 932 30 0*190 935 30 0*192 937 30 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15795 06/23*205 935 45 0*208 938 45 0*211 942 50 0*215 946 50 0
15795 06/23*195 939 30 0*197 941 30 0*200 943 30 0*203 945 30 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15800 06/24*219 950 55 0*223 954 60 0*228 958 65 0*233 961 70 0
15800 06/24*205 946 30 0*207 948 30 0*210 950 35 0*215 953 40 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15805 06/25*238 964 70 0*243 966 70 0*248 968 70 0*253 969 70 0
15805 06/25*221 956 45 0*227 960 50 0*233 963 55 0*239 966 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15810 06/26*258 970 70 0*264 970 70 0*270 970 75 0*278 970 80 0
15810 06/26*247 968 65 0*255 969 70 0*264 970 65 0*272 971 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** *** ** *** *** **
15815 06/27*288 969 65 0*299 967 50 0*310 965 40 0*321 962 30 0
15815 06/27*281 972 50 0*290 973 45 0*300 974 40 0*315 972 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** *** *** **
15820 06/28*332 959 30 0*343 954 25 0E354 949 25 0* 0 0 0 0
15820 06/28*328 966 35 0*342 959 35 0E358 945 35 0E376 923 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
(The 29th was not in HURDAT previously.)
15822 06/29E395 886 35 0E406 854 35 0E415 820 35 0E418 786 35 0
15825 HR
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made large alterations to
the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999). These track and
intensity changes are found to be reasonable. Despite HURDAT having 80 kt at
landfall originally and Neumann et al. (1999) showing hurricane intensity in
the track plot up to landfall in Texas, this storm was not listed in Neumann
et al.'s Table 6 or HURDAT's U.S. hurricane characterization as a U.S.
landfalling hurricane. More significantly, Connor (1956) specifically
listed this system as being "not hurricane intensity" at landfall in Texas.
For the re-analysis here, it was decided to reduce the hurricane to just
below hurricane force before landfall in Texas based upon Connor's
assessment, but still maintaining a peak intensity of 70 kt while over the
open Gulf of Mexico. A peripheral pressure of 995 mb (on the 26th) suggests
winds of at least 54 kt from the Gulf of Mexico wind-pressure relationship at
landfall - 60 kt chosen for best track, which is a reduction from 80 kt
previously in HURDAT.
********************************************************************************
1902/03
15830 09/16/1902 M=10 3 SNBR= 371 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
15830 09/16/1902 M=10 3 SNBR= 392 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
***
15835 09/16* 0 0 0 0* 82 330 35 0* 85 336 35 0* 90 342 35 0
15835 09/16* 0 0 0 0* 77 308 35 0* 80 320 35 0* 85 332 35 0
** *** ** *** ** ***
15840 09/17* 95 350 35 0* 99 360 35 0*104 375 35 0*110 394 35 0
15840 09/17* 92 345 35 0* 98 360 35 0*104 375 35 0*109 389 35 0
** *** ** *** ***
15845 09/18*116 411 40 0*123 430 40 0*129 448 40 0*134 464 45 0
15845 09/18*114 403 40 0*119 417 40 0*123 430 40 0*126 444 45 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15850 09/19*139 480 50 0*146 498 50 0*153 514 55 0*167 523 60 0
15850 09/19*131 461 50 0*136 477 50 0*143 493 55 0*153 509 60 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15855 09/20*180 528 65 0*194 530 70 0*210 530 75 0*229 526 80 0
15855 09/20*168 523 65 0*189 530 70 0*210 530 75 0*229 526 80 0
*** *** ***
15860 09/21*250 515 85 0*271 502 85 0*290 490 85 0*305 480 85 0
15860 09/21*247 517 85 0*265 505 85 0*283 495 85 0*302 484 85 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15865 09/22*322 469 80 0*336 460 75 0E348 448 75 0E359 422 70 0
15865 09/22*321 473 80 0*336 460 75 0E348 448 75 0E358 429 70 0
*** *** *** ***
15870 09/23E369 401 65 0E379 381 65 0E389 361 60 0E399 349 55 0
15870 09/23E368 414 65 0E378 399 65 0E387 385 60 0E395 371 55 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15875 09/24E407 341 55 0E416 332 50 0E426 323 50 0E439 314 45 0
15875 09/24E404 358 55 0E413 345 50 0E423 331 50 0E440 317 45 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15880 09/25E456 303 45 0E476 296 45 0E498 288 40 0E516 292 40 0
15880 09/25E457 304 45 0E476 296 45 0E498 288 40 0E516 292 40 0
*** ***
15885 HR
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made reasonable small
alterations to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999). A
peripheral pressure of 981 mb (12Z on the 21st) suggests winds of at least
74 kt from the subtropical wind-pressure relationship - 85 kt retained in
best track.
********************************************************************************
1902/04
15890 10/03/1902 M=11 4 SNBR= 372 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
15890 10/03/1902 M=11 4 SNBR= 393 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
***
15895 10/03* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*140 930 50 0*150 930 50 0
15895 10/03*140 938 30 0*145 940 30 0*150 942 30 0*155 943 30 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15900 10/04*159 930 50 0*167 929 45 0*172 929 40 0*176 928 40 0
15900 10/04*160 944 30 0*165 945 30 0*170 946 30 0*175 947 30 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15905 10/05*179 927 40 0*182 927 45 0*184 926 50 0*186 926 55 0
15905 10/05*180 948 30 0*185 949 30 0*187 949 35 0*188 947 45 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15910 10/06*188 926 60 0*189 925 60 0*191 925 65 0*193 925 70 0
15910 10/06*189 944 55 0*191 940 60 0*193 937 65 0*195 933 75 0
*** *** ** *** *** *** *** *** *** **
15915 10/07*195 924 70 0*198 923 75 0*201 924 75 0*205 923 80 0
15915 10/07*197 929 85 0*200 925 90 970*203 920 90 0*207 915 90 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** *** ** *** *** **
15920 10/08*211 922 80 0*219 921 85 0*228 920 85 0*235 918 85 0
15920 10/08*211 911 90 0*215 908 90 0*220 905 90 0*227 902 90 0
*** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15925 10/09*243 916 85 0*251 913 85 0*260 909 80 0*269 906 70 0
15925 10/09*234 900 90 0*239 899 85 0*245 897 80 0*253 895 70 0
*** *** ** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15930 10/10*277 903 65 0*285 898 60 0*294 892 60 0*303 883 50 0
15930 10/10*262 891 65 0*271 888 60 0*280 885 55 0*294 878 50 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** ** *** ***
15935 10/11E314 874 40 0E325 863 35 0E337 848 35 0E349 828 35 0
15935 10/11*310 869 40 0E325 859 35 0E337 848 35 0E349 828 35 0
**** *** ***
15940 10/12E366 799 35 0E376 780 35 0E388 728 35 0E399 691 35 0
15940 10/12E364 805 35 0E376 780 35 0E388 728 35 0E399 691 35 0
*** ***
15945 10/13E409 655 35 0E419 610 40 0E428 551 40 0* 0 0 0 0
15950 HR
One major change from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who otherwise made large,
but reasonable alterations to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et
al. (1999). The formation of the system in the Gulf of Tehuantepec as
found in Neumann et al. has been retained, though slightly altered in
track based upon observations collected by Partagas and Diaz. Trek across
the Mexico likely to be at tropical depression intensity. A central
pressure of 970 mb (at 09Z on the 7th) suggests winds of 89 kt from the
Gulf of Mexico wind-pressure relationship - 90 kt utilized in best track.
Winds are adjusted according on the 6th through the 9th. Slight alteration
in track on the 12th to provide for a more realistic translational velocity.
********************************************************************************
1902/05
15955 11/01/1902 M= 6 5 SNBR= 373 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
15955 11/01/1902 M= 6 5 SNBR= 394 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
***
15960 11/01* 0 0 0 0*221 621 35 0*231 630 35 0*242 638 35 0
15960 11/01*200 673 30 0*210 683 30 0*225 673 35 0*246 663 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** *** ***
15965 11/02*253 640 35 0*266 642 35 0*279 642 40 0*295 637 40 0
15965 11/02*266 653 35 0*287 639 40 0*305 626 45 0*318 613 50 0
*** *** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15970 11/03*311 625 40 0*327 611 40 0*342 590 45 0*352 575 45 0
15970 11/03*327 603 55 0*335 592 60 0*343 580 60 0*348 572 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
15975 11/04*362 560 45 0*372 543 45 0*377 530 50 0*381 520 50 0
15975 11/04*352 565 60 0*357 557 55 0*360 550 50 0*363 538 50 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** *** ***
15980 11/05*385 510 50 0*388 500 50 0*390 490 50 0*392 480 40 0
15980 11/05*366 528 50 0*368 519 50 0*370 510 50 0*371 498 40 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15985 11/06*394 470 35 0*396 460 30 0*397 450 25 0*398 439 20 0
15985 11/06*371 486 35 0*370 474 30 0*370 465 25 0*371 454 20 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
15990 TS
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made reasonable small
alterations to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999). A
peripheral pressure of 993 mb (at 12Z on the 3rd) suggests winds of at least
59 kt from the subtropical wind-pressure relationship - 60 kt chosen for best
track. (A slightly higher wind speed could have been chosen, but given the
time of year - early November - with cooler SSTs prevailing a more
conservative value is chosen.) Winds are adjusted accordingly on the 2nd
through the 4th.
*******************************************************************************
1902 - Additional Notes:
Partagas and Diaz (1997) mentioned one additional system considered
for inclusion into HURDAT. The re-analysis team agreed to leave it out
of HURDAT for the following reason:
1) August 25-28, 1902: Not enough evidence for tropical storm intensity.
********************************************************************************
1903
********************************************************************************
1903/01
15995 07/19/1903 M= 8 1 SNBR= 374 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
15995 07/21/1903 M= 6 1 SNBR= 395 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
** * ***
16000 07/19* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*165 618 35 0*172 639 35 0
16005 07/20*179 656 35 0*185 668 35 0*193 683 35 0*200 697 40 0
(The 19th and 20th are omitted from the new HURDAT.)
16010 07/21*209 710 45 0*216 720 55 0*225 732 60 0*236 742 60 0
16010 07/21*200 678 35 0*207 689 35 0*215 700 35 0*225 712 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16015 07/22*248 748 60 0*261 750 70 0*273 750 80 0*284 747 85 0
16015 07/22*237 726 35 0*249 738 35 0*265 750 40 0*276 755 40 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16020 07/23*295 742 90 0*305 737 90 0*316 730 90 0*324 723 90 0
16020 07/23*288 756 45 0*299 754 50 0*310 750 55 0*322 736 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16025 07/24*332 716 90 0*340 705 90 0*347 696 85 0*353 685 85 0
16025 07/24*334 716 65 0*343 701 70 0*353 685 70 0*364 669 70 0
*** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16030 07/25*358 672 80 0*364 656 75 0*370 638 70 0*378 605 70 0
16030 07/25*373 652 70 0*379 636 65 0*385 615 60 0*393 580 55 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16035 07/26*388 570 60 0*398 535 50 0E410 503 45 0E425 466 40 0
16035 07/26*399 547 50 0E405 514 50 0E410 485 45 0E414 457 40 0
*** *** ** **** *** *** *** ***
16040 HR
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made large alterations to
the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999). These track and
intensity changes are found to be reasonable. Partagas and Diaz'
analysis documented that this hurricane reached, at best, a Category 1
hurricane status. Thus peak winds are reduced from 90 kt to 70 kt
and winds are adjusted downward accordingly for the lifetime of this
system.
********************************************************************************
1903/02
16045 08/06/1903 M=11 2 SNBR= 375 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
16045 08/06/1903 M=11 2 SNBR= 396 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
***
16050 08/06* 0 0 0 0*125 432 50 0*125 450 50 0*127 470 50 0
16050 08/06* 0 0 0 0*118 423 50 0*120 435 50 0*123 447 50 0
*** *** *** *** *** ***
16055 08/07*130 488 55 0*132 505 65 0*134 520 70 0*136 533 70 0
16055 08/07*126 460 55 0*131 475 65 0*135 490 70 0*137 509 70 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16060 08/08*138 544 70 0*139 556 70 0*141 569 70 0*143 583 75 0
16060 08/08*138 526 70 0*138 541 70 0*140 560 70 0*143 578 75 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16065 08/09*144 598 75 0*145 614 80 0*147 630 80 0*149 647 80 0
16065 08/09*144 598 80 0*145 614 90 970*147 630 100 0*149 647 105 0
** ** *** *** ***
16070 08/10*152 664 85 0*156 682 85 0*160 700 90 0*165 720 90 0
16070 08/10*152 664 105 0*156 682 105 0*160 700 105 0*166 720 105 0
*** *** *** ***
16075 08/11*170 741 90 0*176 762 95 0*182 780 100 0*189 796 105 0
16075 08/11*172 738 105 0*177 756 105 0*183 773 105 0*186 787 105 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16080 08/12*193 810 105 0*197 823 105 0*200 836 105 0*203 849 100 0
16080 08/12*190 800 105 0*194 811 105 958*197 825 105 0*201 840 105 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16085 08/13*206 861 95 0*208 873 90 0*210 884 90 0*211 892 85 0
16085 08/13*204 856 105 0*208 873 85 0*210 884 70 0*212 894 65 0
*** *** *** ** ** *** *** **
16090 08/14*212 900 85 0*213 909 85 0*215 914 85 0*217 923 85 0
16090 08/14*214 904 70 0*217 914 70 0*220 925 70 0*221 934 70 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16095 08/15*220 930 85 0*224 940 85 0*228 950 85 0*230 960 80 0
16095 08/15*223 943 70 0*226 951 70 986*230 960 70 0*231 968 70 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** *** ** *** *** **
16100 08/16*232 968 75 0*234 975 50 0*234 986 40 0*232 996 35 0
16100 08/16*230 976 70 0*228 983 50 0*225 990 40 0*220 996 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** *** *** ***
16105 HR
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made reasonable small
alterations to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999).
A central pressure of 970 mb (0430Z on the 9th) suggests winds of 89 kt from
the southern wind-pressure relationship - 90 kt utilized in best track, up
from 80 kt previously. A peripheral pressure of 975 mb (0930Z on the
11th) suggests winds of at least 84 kt from the southern wind-pressure
relationship and a wind measurement of 105 kt was observed - 105 kt used in
the best track, up from 100 kt previously. A central pressure of 958 mb
(05Z on the 12th) suggests winds of 102 kt from the southern wind-pressure
relationship and a wind measurement of 100 kt was observed - 105 kt retained
in best track. A central pressure of 986 mb (03Z on the 15th) suggests
winds of 68 kt from the Gulf of Mexico wind-pressure relationship - 70 kt
used in best track, down from 85 kt. Winds adjusted accordingly from the
9th to the 16th. Inland decay model of Kaplan and DeMaria (1995) utilized
for inland winds over the Yucatan of Mexico. Full lifecycle of this
hurricane is not known, due to lack of information about its genesis stage.
********************************************************************************
1903/03
16110 09/09/1903 M= 8 3 SNBR= 376 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=2
16110 09/09/1903 M= 8 3 SNBR= 397 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=1
*** *
16115 09/09* 0 0 0 0*214 724 50 0*218 734 50 0*222 740 50 0
16120 09/10*226 747 55 0*232 753 60 0*238 760 65 0*240 765 70 0
16120 09/10*226 747 55 0*232 753 60 0*238 760 65 0*245 767 70 0
*** ***
16125 09/11*244 769 80 0*249 775 85 0*254 784 85 0*258 791 85 0
16125 09/11*251 775 75 0*255 782 75 0*257 789 75 0*259 796 75 976
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** ***
16130 09/12*264 803 75 0*269 812 65 0*273 821 60 988*278 829 50 0
16130 09/12*262 803 70 0*267 812 60 0*273 821 55 988*277 829 50 0
*** ** *** ** ** ***
16135 09/13*281 836 55 0*285 842 60 0*289 848 65 0*295 853 70 0
16135 09/13*281 836 60 0*285 842 70 0*289 848 80 0*295 853 80 0
** ** ** **
16140 09/14*303 857 65 0*310 859 55 0*316 860 35 0*320 860 35 0
16140 09/14*303 857 80 0*310 859 60 0*316 860 45 0*320 860 35 0
** ** **
16145 09/15*324 859 35 0*327 856 35 0*330 853 35 0*333 849 35 0
16150 09/16*336 843 35 0*338 837 35 0*340 830 35 0*339 823 30 0
16150 09/16*336 843 30 0*338 837 30 0*340 830 30 0*339 823 30 0
** ** **
16155 HRCFL2AFL1
16155 HRCFL1AFL1
****
Two major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997) where made to the track of
this hurricane. The first alteration is to bring the center of the system
to just west of Nassau near 00 UTC on the 10th, based upon wind and pressure
observations. The second major alteration is to utilize the Ho
et al. (1987) landfall position for Southeast Florida, which does better
match the possible central position from Cat Cay. Partagas and Diaz
otherwise made reasonable small alterations to the track and intensity
shown in Neumann et al. (1999). A central pressure of 976 mb (11th) suggests
winds of 80 kt from the subtropical wind-pressure relationship. However, Ho
et al. estimate a large (43 nmi) RMW, so that winds are chosen to be 75 kt
which matches the observed winds in Jupiter, Florida - this is a moderate
reduction from the original HURDAT. Ho et al.'s estimate of 977 mb at
landfall in Southeast Florida was based upon a peripheral pressure of 996 mb
from Tampa. This is consistent with the measured 976 mb central pressure
from Cat Cay, Bahamas. The 75 kt at landfall in Southeast Florida makes this
hurricane a Category 1, which is downgraded from the estimate of Category 2
in Neumann et al.'s (1999) Table 6/U.S. hurricane characterization in
HURDAT. A storm tide of 8' was recorded at Jupiter, Florida (Barnes 1998a).
A peripheral pressure of 985 mb (at 22Z on the 13th) suggests winds of at
least 70 kt from the Gulf of Mexico wind-pressure relationship. A storm tide
value of 10' was recorded at Apalachicola, Florida (Barnes 1998a). Winds
at landfall are estimated at 80 kt based upon these observations, which is
increased slightly from the 70 kt originally in HURDAT. The 80 kt at landfall
in the panhandle of Florida retains the Category 1 in Neumann et al.'s
assessment. Winds are adjusted accordingly on the 13th and 14th.
Full lifecycle of this hurricane is not known, due to lack of information
about its genesis stage.
********************************************************************************
1903/04
16160 09/12/1903 M= 6 4 SNBR= 377 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=1
16160 09/12/1903 M= 6 4 SNBR= 398 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=1
***
16165 09/12*225 556 60 0*233 564 60 0*242 573 70 0*251 583 70 0
16165 09/12*225 556 60 0*233 564 60 0*242 573 60 0*254 587 60 0
** *** *** **
16170 09/13*260 594 70 0*268 607 70 0*275 620 70 0*281 636 70 0
16170 09/13*265 604 60 0*274 622 60 0*280 640 60 0*284 652 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16175 09/14*286 654 70 0*292 672 70 0*297 686 70 0*303 696 70 0
16175 09/14*288 665 60 0*291 678 60 0*295 690 60 0*301 703 65 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16180 09/15*309 704 70 0*315 712 75 0*321 718 80 0*331 723 85 0
16180 09/15*308 715 70 0*316 726 75 0*325 733 80 0*341 740 85 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16185 09/16*346 728 85 0*364 733 80 0*384 739 70 0*400 747 65 0
16185 09/16*362 745 80 0*380 746 75 0*393 747 70 990*403 750 55 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** *** *** *** **
16190 09/17*410 756 55 0*419 764 45 0E430 772 40 0E448 770 30 0
16190 09/17*411 755 55 0*419 763 45 0E430 770 40 0E448 770 30 0
*** *** *** ***
16195 HR NJ1 NY1 CT1
16195 HR NJ1 DE1
*** ***
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made reasonable small
alterations to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999). A
peripheral pressure of 997 mb (15Z on the 16th) suggests winds of at least
53 kt from the northern wind-pressure relationship - 70 kt chosen for best
track which is the same as the original HURDAT. 990 mb was analyzed as the
central pressure at landfall in Jarrell et al. (1992), which suggests winds
of 63 kt from the northern wind-pressure relationship. Intensity at landfall
is retained as a Category 1 at New Jersey (70 kt) - which agrees with Table 6
in Neumann et al. (1999)/U.S. hurricane characterization in HURDAT. A ship
report of hurricane force winds at the Delaware Capes (from Roth and Cobb
2001) suggests that the Delaware coast also experienced Category 1
conditions. However, observations collected by Partagas and Diaz indicate
that New York and Connecticut were not likely affected by sustained
hurricane winds so that they are removed from being listed as a Category 1
at landfall. Full lifecycle of this hurricane is not known, due to lack of
information about its genesis stage.
********************************************************************************
1903/05
16200 09/20/1903 M= 7 5 SNBR= 378 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
16200 09/19/1903 M= 8 5 SNBR= 399 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
** * ***
(The 19th is new to HURDAT.)
16202 09/19*208 716 30 0*213 717 30 0*217 717 30 0*220 717 30 0
16205 09/20*219 716 35 0*225 714 35 0*230 712 35 0*234 713 35 0
16205 09/20*223 717 30 0*226 717 30 0*230 717 30 0*235 718 30 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16210 09/21*239 714 35 0*243 716 35 0*247 718 40 0*251 720 40 0
16210 09/21*241 720 30 0*246 722 30 0*250 725 30 0*255 727 30 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16215 09/22*254 722 45 0*258 724 45 0*262 726 45 0*267 728 45 0
16215 09/22*260 729 30 0*265 731 30 0*270 733 35 0*275 735 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16220 09/23*272 729 45 0*278 729 45 0*284 729 45 0*290 729 45 0
16220 09/23*279 736 40 0*285 736 40 0*290 737 45 0*300 739 45 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** *** ***
16225 09/24*297 727 50 0*303 724 50 0*310 720 50 0*318 713 50 0
16225 09/24*314 740 50 0*328 738 50 0*340 730 50 0*347 716 50 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16230 09/25*328 703 50 0*339 691 45 0*347 675 45 0*351 659 40 0
16230 09/25*351 704 50 0*354 690 45 0*355 675 45 0*360 653 40 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16235 09/26*358 637 35 0*360 611 30 0*366 582 25 0* 0 0 0 0
16235 09/26*367 627 35 0*373 601 30 0*378 575 25 0*382 556 25 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** **
16240 TS
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made large alterations to
the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999). These track and
intensity changes are found to be reasonable. A peripheral pressure of
1003 mb (12Z on the 24th) suggests winds of at least 43 kt from the
subtropical wind-pressure relationship - 50 kt retained in HURDAT.
A peripheral pressure of 1004 mb (12Z on the 25th) suggests winds of
at least 42 kt from the northern wind-pressure relationship - 45 kt
retained in HURDAT.
********************************************************************************
1903/06
16245 09/26/1903 M= 5 6 SNBR= 379 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
16245 09/26/1903 M= 5 6 SNBR= 400 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
***
16250 09/26* 0 0 0 0*229 588 40 0*233 600 40 0*236 616 40 0
16255 09/27*239 628 45 0*243 638 50 0*248 646 50 0*261 653 55 0
16255 09/27*239 628 45 0*243 638 50 0*248 646 55 0*260 653 60 0
** *** **
16260 09/28*274 654 60 0*288 652 65 0*302 647 70 0*316 637 75 0
16260 09/28*273 657 70 0*287 657 80 0*300 655 90 0*321 642 95 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16265 09/29*331 624 80 0*346 606 85 0*362 576 85 0*379 530 85 0
16265 09/29*341 623 95 0*360 591 95 0*375 563 90 0*394 528 85 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** ***
16270 09/30*388 500 80 0E406 462 75 0E435 410 70 0* 0 0 0 0
16270 09/30*412 486 80 0E427 448 75 0E445 405 70 0E465 355 60 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** **** *** **
16275 HR
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made reasonable small
alterations to the the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999).
A peripheral pressure of 988 mb (16Z on the 28th) suggests winds of
at least 66 kt - 95 kt is chosen for the best track which is appropriate
given hurricane force winds were observed in Bermuda on the weak side of
the storm.
********************************************************************************
1903/07
16280 10/01/1903 M=10 7 SNBR= 380 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
16280 10/01/1903 M=10 7 SNBR= 401 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
***
16285 10/01*202 575 60 0*204 588 60 0*208 600 65 0*214 612 70 0
16285 10/01*170 560 60 0*177 573 60 0*185 585 60 0*194 597 60 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** ** *** *** **
16290 10/02*221 620 70 0*229 628 70 0*237 634 70 0*247 636 70 0
16290 10/02*203 610 65 0*215 622 70 0*230 635 70 0*243 638 70 0
*** *** ** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16295 10/03*259 633 70 0*271 629 70 0*281 622 75 0*290 612 75 0
16295 10/03*254 637 70 0*263 634 70 0*273 630 75 0*280 627 75 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16300 10/04*297 603 80 0*301 593 80 0*301 580 85 0*299 566 85 0
16300 10/04*289 622 80 0*295 616 80 0*300 607 85 0*305 591 85 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16305 10/05*296 552 85 0*293 538 85 0*289 525 85 0*286 510 80 0
16305 10/05*306 572 85 0*304 552 85 0*300 534 85 0*295 519 80 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16310 10/06*284 497 75 0*282 484 70 0*279 471 70 0*273 470 70 0
16310 10/06*289 502 75 0*281 488 70 0*270 480 70 0*268 482 70 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16315 10/07*268 478 70 0*269 488 70 0*272 493 70 0*279 489 70 0
16315 10/07*267 484 70 0*268 487 70 0*270 490 70 0*276 488 70 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16320 10/08*281 482 70 0*282 472 70 0*283 465 70 0*284 450 65 0
16320 10/08*280 482 70 0*282 472 70 0*283 462 70 0*285 450 65 0
*** *** ***
16325 10/09*285 434 65 0*286 419 60 0*288 404 50 0*293 390 45 0
16325 10/09*290 431 65 0*295 415 60 0*300 400 50 0*305 387 45 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16330 10/10E301 375 40 0E312 362 35 0E324 350 35 0* 0 0 0 0
16330 10/10E309 375 40 0E316 362 35 0E324 350 35 0E336 332 35 0
*** *** **** *** **
16335 HR
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made reasonable small
alterations to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999).
Full lifecycle of this hurricane is not known, due to lack of information
about its genesis stage.
********************************************************************************
1903/08
16340 10/05/1903 M= 6 8 SNBR= 381 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
16340 10/05/1903 M= 6 8 SNBR= 402 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
***
16345 10/05*240 688 40 0*244 691 45 0*250 695 50 0*257 695 55 0
16345 10/05*255 725 35 0*257 723 35 0*260 720 40 0*263 717 40 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16350 10/06*263 694 55 0*268 692 60 0*272 690 65 0*275 688 70 0
16350 10/06*266 713 40 0*269 709 40 0*272 705 40 0*275 701 40 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** ** *** **
16355 10/07*278 685 70 0*280 683 70 0*283 680 70 0*286 676 70 0
16355 10/07*278 697 40 0*281 693 40 0*285 688 40 0*290 682 45 0
*** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16360 10/08*289 671 70 0*292 666 70 0*297 661 75 0*300 660 75 0
16360 10/08*295 674 50 0*300 669 55 0*305 665 60 0*311 662 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16365 10/09*304 660 80 0*309 662 85 0*313 668 85 0*316 677 85 0
16365 10/09*317 659 60 0*323 657 60 0*330 655 60 0*337 653 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16370 10/10*319 691 85 0*322 709 75 0*330 730 70 0E344 737 70 0
16370 10/10*345 652 55 0*353 651 50 0E361 650 50 0E372 648 50 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** **** *** ** **** *** **
16375 HR
16375 TS
**
Major changes were made to this system from that proposed by Partagas and
Diaz (1997). Portions of track that they proposed are not reasonable.
After re-examination of available observations for this system from
the Historical Weather Map series, new track positions are proposed for
the 5th through the 8th, which are different from both Neumann et al.
(1999) as well as Partagas and Diaz. These position are only moderately
altered from those seen in Neumann et al. (Partagas and Diaz' apparent
error was in focusing upon a possible position based on one ship [at 23N,
75W] on the 6th. However, space-time continuity with data on the 7th and
8th was not consistent with what they believed occurred on the 6th.)
Positions for the 9th and 10th proposed by Partagas and Diaz are large
alterations to what appears in Neumann et al., but do look quite
reasonable and are retained as suggested. (On the 9th, a strong front
entered the Atlantic from the U.S. east coast accompanied by an
extratropical low centered near 35N, 73W. On the 10th, the
extratropical low had drifted north (37N, 73.5W) and intensified, while
the tropical storm was becoming absorbed into the extratropical system
near the warm frontal boundary on the east side of the extratropical low.)
Partagas and Diaz analyzed this tropical system as peaking as a tropical
storm, rather than as a hurricane as found in Neumann et al. and HURDAT.
Partagas and Diaz' characterization of the intensity is retained here.
Two peripheral pressures of 997 mb (both at 12Z on the 9th) suggest winds
of at least 53 kt from the subtropical wind-pressure relationship - 60 kt
chosen for the best track. Peak winds reduced from the standard
Category 2 (85 kt) down to a strong tropical storm (60 kt), since
available observations support a substantially weaker system. A storm
tide of 9' attributed to this system observed in Norfolk, Virginia (Roth
and Cobb 2001) was instead caused by the separate, strong extratropical
storm system.
********************************************************************************
1903/09
16376 10/21/1903 M= 7 9 SNBR= 403 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
16376 10/21* 0 0 0 0*212 720 30 0*215 725 30 0*219 729 30 0
16376 10/22*225 733 30 0*232 736 30 0*240 740 30 0*248 742 30 0
16376 10/23*256 743 30 0*263 743 30 0*270 743 35 0*279 745 40 0
16376 10/24*290 748 45 0*301 751 50 0*312 750 50 0E324 745 50 0
16376 10/25E336 731 50 0E345 715 50 0E358 695 50 0E380 669 50 0
16376 10/26E405 637 50 0E428 604 50 0E450 575 45 0E473 554 40 0
16376 10/27E491 537 40 0E511 524 40 0E530 510 35 0E552 495 35 0
16376 TS
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997) for this newly documented
tropical storm.
********************************************************************************
1903/10
16380 11/17/1903 M= 9 9 SNBR= 382 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
16380 11/17/1903 M= 9 10 SNBR= 404 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
** ***
16385 11/17* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*197 396 35 0*201 410 35 0
16385 11/17* 0 0 0 0*190 370 35 0*195 385 35 0*199 397 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** *** ***
16390 11/18*205 420 35 0*211 432 35 0*219 444 35 0*228 456 35 0
16390 11/18*204 413 35 0*211 429 35 0*219 444 35 0*228 456 35 0
*** *** ***
16395 11/19*237 468 35 0*245 480 40 0*255 493 45 0*264 500 50 0
16395 11/19*237 468 35 0*245 480 40 0*255 493 45 0*264 498 50 0
***
16400 11/20*273 502 60 0*282 500 65 0*290 492 70 0*292 483 70 0
16400 11/20*273 496 60 0*282 493 65 0*290 485 70 0*292 477 70 0
*** *** *** ** ***
16405 11/21*293 473 70 0*293 462 75 0*293 454 75 0*295 447 80 0
16405 11/21*293 471 70 0*293 462 70 0*293 454 70 0*295 447 70 0
*** *** ** ** **
16410 11/22*297 441 80 0*300 436 85 0*304 432 85 0*313 429 85 0
16410 11/22*297 441 70 0*300 436 70 0*304 432 70 0*313 429 70 0
** ** ** **
16415 11/23*328 427 85 0*343 425 80 0*354 423 75 0*363 421 70 0
16415 11/23*328 427 70 0*343 425 70 0*354 423 70 0*363 421 70 0
** ** **
16420 11/24*370 419 70 0*377 417 70 0*385 414 70 0*394 409 70 0
16425 11/25*403 405 65 0*413 400 65 0*422 396 65 0E435 389 50 0
16430 HR
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made reasonable small
alterations to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999),
originally storm number 9. Peak winds are reduced from the standard
Category 2 (85 kt) down to Category 1 (70 kt) based upon available
observations that suggest that the system was, at most, a minimal
hurricane.
********************************************************************************
1903 - Additional Notes:
Partagas and Diaz (1997) mentioned three additional systems considered
for inclusion into HURDAT. The re-analysis team agreed to leave them out
of HURDAT for the following reasons:
1) June 10-12, 1903: Not enough evidence for tropical storm intensity.
2) August 20-23, 1903: Not enough evidence for tropical storm intensity.
3) November 23-26, 1903: Not enough evidence for tropical storm intensity.
********************************************************************************
1904
********************************************************************************
1904/01
16435 06/11/1904 M= 4 1 SNBR= 383 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
16435 06/10/1904 M= 5 1 SNBR= 405 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
** * ***
(The 10th is new to HURDAT.)
16437 06/10* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*130 805 30 0*136 807 30 0
16440 06/11* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*155 793 35 0*159 792 35 0
16440 06/11*142 807 30 0*146 805 30 0*150 803 30 0*157 802 30 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16445 06/12*164 792 35 0*168 791 35 0*172 790 35 0*176 788 35 0
16445 06/12*162 801 35 0*168 799 40 0*173 797 45 0*177 795 50 0
*** *** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16455 06/13*180 786 40 0*184 783 45 0*188 780 50 0*192 778 55 0
16450 06/13*181 792 55 0*184 789 60 0*187 785 65 0*194 777 70 0
*** *** ** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16455 06/14*195 774 60 0*197 770 55 0*199 765 35 0*201 760 25 0
16455 06/14*203 768 55 0*211 760 40 0*220 753 35 0*229 746 25 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** *** ***
16460 TS
16460 HR
**
The only major change from Partagas and Diaz (1997) is to increase the storm
to minimal hurricane status (Category 1 - 70 kt) at landfall in Cuba, based
upon the analysis from Perez (2000). Partagas and Diaz otherwise made
reasonable small alterations to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et
al. (1999). Winds are also boosted from the 12th and the 13th based upon
observations in Jamaica listed by Partagas and Diaz. Winds reduced on the
14th, due to earlier landfall in revised HURDAT.
********************************************************************************
1904/02
16465 09/08/1904 M= 8 2 SNBR= 384 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=1
16465 09/08/1904 M= 8 2 SNBR= 406 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=1
***
16470 09/08*193 539 60 0*196 550 60 0*200 561 65 0*205 575 70 0
16470 09/08*162 540 50 0*167 548 50 0*173 557 50 0*181 571 50 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16475 09/09*210 586 70 0*214 596 70 0*218 606 70 0*223 615 70 0
16475 09/09*190 586 50 0*199 603 50 0*210 620 50 0*217 630 50 0
*** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16480 09/10*226 621 70 0*230 630 70 0*236 640 70 0*241 650 70 0
16480 09/10*225 642 50 0*234 655 50 0*240 665 50 0*247 673 50 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16485 09/11*245 659 70 0*249 667 70 0*254 676 75 0*259 685 75 0
16485 09/11*251 680 50 0*255 690 50 0*259 700 50 0*262 708 50 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16490 09/12*263 693 75 0*267 702 80 0*271 711 85 0*275 721 85 0
16490 09/12*266 716 55 0*268 723 60 0*270 730 65 0*272 738 70 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16495 09/13*280 732 85 0*284 742 85 0*290 753 85 0*296 760 85 0
16495 09/13*276 747 70 0*281 757 70 0*290 767 70 0*297 774 70 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** ** *** *** **
16500 09/14*305 770 85 0*315 780 80 0*327 790 75 0*346 792 65 0
16500 09/14*304 780 70 0*315 785 70 0*327 790 70 0*346 795 60 0
*** *** ** *** ** ** *** **
16505 09/15E365 776 65 0E391 750 65 0E420 703 65 0E459 640 55 0
16505 09/15*365 776 55 0E391 750 65 0E420 703 75 0E459 640 55 0
* ** **
16510 HR SC1
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made reasonable small
alterations to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999). Peak
winds reduced from Category 2 (85 kt) down to Category 1 (70 kt) as a hurricane
since observations indicate that the system was, at best, a minimal hurricane.
Winds reduced accordingly from the 8th to the 14th. Winds are increased on
the 15th due to observations over New England in Partagas and Diaz while
during its extratropical stage. Landfall at South Carolina as a 70 kt
Category 1 agrees with assessment in the U.S. landfall categorization
in HURDAT/Table 6 of Neumann et al. (1999). It is to be noted that
this system had hurricane force winds (and produced these along the U.S.
coast) during its extratropical stage on the 15th. Full lifecycle of this
hurricane is not known, due to lack of information about its genesis stage.
********************************************************************************
1904/03
16515 10/12/1904 M=10 3 SNBR= 385 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
16515 10/12/1904 M=10 3 SNBR= 407 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=1
*** *
16520 10/12* 0 0 0 0*153 757 35 0*153 764 35 0*154 771 35 0
16525 10/13*156 777 35 0*159 782 35 0*164 787 35 0*171 791 35 0
16525 10/13*159 777 35 0*164 782 35 0*170 787 40 0*175 791 40 0
*** *** *** ** *** **
16530 10/14*179 793 35 0*186 795 35 0*193 797 40 0*199 798 40 0
16530 10/14*180 793 40 0*186 795 40 0*193 797 45 0*198 798 50 0
*** ** ** ** *** **
16535 10/15*204 799 45 0*209 799 45 0*215 800 40 0*221 799 40 0
16535 10/15*201 799 55 0*206 799 60 0*210 800 65 0*214 800 65 0
*** ** *** ** *** ** *** *** **
16540 10/16*228 797 40 0*235 795 45 0*242 793 55 0*248 791 65 0
16540 10/16*217 800 65 0*220 800 55 0*225 800 50 0*233 799 55 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16545 10/17*253 792 65 0*256 794 65 0*260 798 65 0*260 805 60 0
16545 10/17*242 799 65 0*251 801 70 0*257 807 60 0*259 809 50 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16550 10/18*260 809 55 0*257 814 45 0*252 816 40 0*253 809 35 0
16550 10/18*262 811 45 0*265 814 40 0*267 817 40 0*268 823 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** *** ***
16555 10/19*259 808 30 0*263 809 25 0*267 810 25 0*269 809 20 0
16555 10/19*267 825 35 0*266 826 35 0*263 827 35 0*259 826 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16560 10/20*271 807 20 0*273 806 20 0*275 805 20 0*277 802 20 0
16560 10/20*256 822 35 0*254 816 35 0*255 810 35 0*258 800 30 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16565 10/21*280 799 20 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0
16565 10/21*261 790 25 0*265 782 20 0*270 770 20 0*274 759 20 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16570 HR
16570 HRCFL1
****
The only major change from Partagas and Diaz (1997) is to increase the storm
to minimal hurricane status (Category 1 - 65 kt) at landfall in Cuba, based
upon the analysis from Perez (2000). Winds increased accordingly on the 14th
through the 16th. Partagas and Diaz otherwise made reasonable small
alterations to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999).
A peripheral pressure of 1004 mb (12Z on the 12th) suggests winds of at least
39 kt from the southern wind-pressure relationship - 40 kt chosen for best
track. A peripheral pressure of 989 mb (05Z on the 17th) suggests winds
of at least 65 kt from the subtropical wind-pressure relationship - 70 kt
chosen for best track. Winds at landfall in southeast Florida are
estimated at 70 kt, making this a Category 1 landfall which is consistent
with the original HURDAT 6 hourly intensity estimate just before landfall
(which had 65 kt). However, Table 6 in Neumann et al. (1999)/U.S. hurricane
characterization in HURDAT did not list this as a U.S. landfalling
hurricane. A peripheral pressure of 1001 mb (12Z on the 20th) suggests
winds of at least 43 kt from the Gulf of Mexico wind-pressure relationship -
35 kt chosen for best track since the center had already made a second
landfall by this time. Inland decay model of Kaplan and DeMaria (1995)
utilized for inland winds over Florida.
********************************************************************************
1904/04
16575 10/19/1904 M= 5 4 SNBR= 386 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
16575 10/19/1904 M= 7 4 SNBR= 408 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
* ***
16580 10/19* 0 0 0 0*260 462 35 0*258 470 35 0*255 479 35 0
16580 10/19* 0 0 0 0*258 454 35 0*250 463 35 0*238 475 35 0
*** *** *** *** *** ***
16585 10/20*250 488 35 0*247 497 35 0*245 506 35 0*244 514 35 0
16585 10/20*227 488 35 0*221 503 35 0*225 516 35 0*230 522 35 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16590 10/21*244 522 40 0*244 529 40 0*245 537 45 0*246 544 45 0
16590 10/21*236 523 40 0*243 522 40 0*250 520 45 0*260 522 45 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16595 10/22*250 550 45 0*254 555 45 0*260 560 40 0*265 564 35 0
16595 10/22*267 528 45 0*275 536 45 0*285 545 40 0*296 553 35 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16600 10/23*275 570 35 0*286 573 35 0*300 578 30 0* 0 0 0 0
16600 10/23*311 561 35 0*328 568 35 0*350 575 35 0*367 575 35 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** **
(24th and 25th are new to HURDAT.)
16601 10/24E392 567 35 0E417 556 35 0E445 540 35 0E473 512 35 0
16602 10/25E504 484 35 0E534 454 35 0E560 425 35 0E578 395 35 0
16605 TS
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made large alterations to
the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999). These track and
intensity changes are found to be reasonable. A peripheral pressure of
1005 mb (12Z on the 21st) suggests winds of at least 38 kt from the
subtropical wind-pressure relationship - 45 kt retained in best track.
********************************************************************************
1904/05
16610 10/29/1904 M= 8 5 SNBR= 387 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
16610 10/31/1904 M= 7 5 SNBR= 409 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
** * ***
16615 10/29* 0 0 0 0*199 860 35 0*203 868 40 0*206 875 35 0
16620 10/30*208 881 35 0*212 889 35 0*217 896 35 0*222 901 35 0
(The 29th and 30th are deleted from HURDAT.)
16625 10/31*226 906 35 0*231 911 35 0*237 916 35 0*242 919 35 0
16625 10/31* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*200 913 35 0*204 918 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** *** ***
16630 11/01*246 920 35 0*251 920 40 0*257 919 40 0*262 918 45 0
16630 11/01*210 920 35 0*216 922 40 0*223 920 40 0*231 917 45 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16635 11/02*268 915 45 0*274 911 45 0*282 906 40 0*290 899 35 0
16635 11/02*238 914 45 0*244 911 45 0*253 907 40 0*265 898 35 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16640 11/03*300 891 35 0*309 879 35 0*316 864 35 0*316 843 35 0
16640 11/03*278 889 35 0*291 881 35 0*303 867 35 0*313 848 30 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** **
16645 11/04*319 828 35 0*328 806 35 0*336 786 35 0*340 765 35 0
16645 11/04*321 827 30 0*329 804 30 0E335 780 35 0E338 760 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** **** *** **** ***
16650 11/05*344 745 35 0*349 724 35 0*353 703 30 0*360 685 25 0
16650 11/05E345 734 35 0E351 711 35 0E360 687 35 0E377 660 35 0
**** *** **** *** **** *** ** **** ***
(The 6th is new to HURDAT.)
16652 11/06E400 624 35 0E424 593 35 0E450 575 35 0E466 557 35 0
16655 TS
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made large alterations
to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999). These track and
intensity changes are found to be reasonable. A peripheral pressure of
1005 mb (12Z on the 31st) suggests winds of at least 34 kt - 35 kt retained
in best track. Inland decay model of Kaplan and DeMaria (1995) utilized for
inland winds over the Southeast U.S.
********************************************************************************
1904 - Additional Notes:
Partagas and Diaz (1997) mentioned five additional systems considered
for inclusion into HURDAT. The re-analysis team agreed to leave them out
of HURDAT for the following reasons:
1) September 3-5, 1904: Not enough evidence for tropical storm intensity.
2) September 24-30, 1904: Not enough evidence for tropical storm intensity.
3) October 10-16, 1904: Not enough evidence for tropical storm intensity.
4) October 28-November 2, 1904: Gale force intensity, but likely
extratropical.
5) November 9-14, 1904: Numerous gale to hurricane force observations, but
likely was an extratropical storm.
********************************************************************************
1905
********************************************************************************
1905/01
16660 09/06/1905 M= 2 1 SNBR= 388 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
16660 09/06/1905 M= 3 1 SNBR= 410 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
* ***
16665 09/06* 0 0 0 0*140 580 50 0*140 590 50 0*140 600 50 0
16665 09/06* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*116 585 50 0*120 598 50 0
*** *** ** *** *** *** ***
16670 09/07*141 609 50 0*141 618 50 0*141 627 40 0*141 640 30 0
16670 09/07*125 611 50 0*130 628 50 0*135 643 40 0*139 658 35 0
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** **
(The 8th is new to HURDAT.)
16672 09/08*144 673 30 0*149 689 30 0*153 703 30 0*159 721 25 0
16675 TS
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made large alterations
to the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999). These track
and intensity changes are found to be reasonable. Full lifecycle
of this tropical storm is not known, due to lack of information about its
genesis stage.
********************************************************************************
1905/02
17350 09/11/1905 M= 6 2 SNBR= 389 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
17350 09/11/1905 M= 6 2 SNBR= 411 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
***
17355 09/11* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*195 510 35 0*197 521 35 0
17360 09/12*200 533 35 0*202 541 35 0*205 550 40 0*210 560 40 0
17365 09/13*214 568 40 0*218 574 45 0*221 579 50 0*223 583 50 0
17370 09/14*226 586 50 0*229 588 50 0*232 591 45 0*238 594 40 0
17375 09/15*244 597 35 0*250 600 35 0*255 603 35 0*259 606 35 0
17380 09/16*263 611 35 0*267 615 35 0*270 620 30 0*272 625 30 0
17385 TS
Partagas and Diaz (1997) introduced no changes from that shown in Neumann
et al. (1999).
********************************************************************************
1905/03
16720 09/24/1905 M= 7 3 SNBR= 390 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
16720 09/24/1905 M= 7 3 SNBR= 412 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
***
16725 09/24* 0 0 0 0*177 840 35 0*182 847 35 0*186 854 35 0
16730 09/25*190 860 35 0*194 867 40 0*199 874 40 0*204 881 35 0
16735 09/26*209 888 35 0*215 897 35 0*222 905 35 0*229 909 40 0
16735 09/26*209 888 35 0*215 897 35 0*222 905 45 0*229 909 45 0
** **
16740 09/27*237 914 40 0*245 918 40 0*253 920 40 0*259 922 45 0
16740 09/27*237 914 45 0*245 918 45 0*253 920 45 0*259 922 45 0
** ** **
16745 09/28*265 924 45 0*272 926 45 0*277 927 45 0*283 928 45 0
16750 09/29*287 927 45 0*292 926 45 0*298 925 40 0*306 918 35 0
16755 09/30*317 909 35 0*330 912 35 0*341 920 35 0*348 934 30 0
16760 TS
Partagas and Diaz (1997) did not introduce any changes for this storm from
that shown in Neumann et al. (1999). A peripheral pressures of 1002 mb
(12Z on the 26th) suggests winds of at least 41 kt from the Gulf of Mexico
wind-pressure relationship - 45 kt chosen for best track. Winds are
adjusted accordingly on the 26th and 27th. Another peripheral pressure of
1002 mb (on the 28th) suggests winds of at least 41 kt - 40 kt retained for
best track at 12Z since the storm was inland by this time.
********************************************************************************
1905/04
16765 10/01/1905 M=13 4 SNBR= 391 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
16765 10/01/1905 M=13 4 SNBR= 413 NOT NAMED XING=0 SSS=0
***
16770 10/01* 0 0 0 0*107 797 60 0*110 797 60 0*111 797 60 0
16770 10/01* 0 0 0 0*110 792 30 0*110 790 30 0*111 788 30 0
*** *** ** *** ** *** **
16775 10/02*113 796 60 0*115 796 60 0*117 795 60 0*119 794 60 0
16775 10/02*113 787 30 0*115 786 30 0*117 785 30 0*119 783 30 0
*** ** *** ** *** ** *** **
16780 10/03*121 793 70 0*124 792 70 0*128 790 70 0*133 788 70 0
16780 10/03*121 782 35 0*124 781 35 0*127 780 35 0*132 779 35 0
*** ** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16785 10/04*138 786 70 0*145 782 70 0*150 779 70 0*158 773 70 0
16785 10/04*137 778 40 0*141 777 40 0*145 775 45 0*152 770 45 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16790 10/05*164 769 70 0*171 764 70 0*178 758 70 0*184 754 70 0
16790 10/05*158 765 50 0*163 760 50 0*170 755 55 0*181 748 55 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16795 10/06*190 749 70 0*196 742 70 0*202 737 70 0*211 729 70 0
16795 10/06*192 742 60 0*202 736 60 0*210 730 60 0*221 723 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16800 10/07*222 717 70 0*233 707 70 0*242 697 70 0*249 690 70 0
16800 10/07*232 717 60 0*243 711 60 0*253 705 60 0*264 696 60 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16805 10/08*255 684 70 0*262 677 70 0E270 670 75 0E280 660 75 0
16805 10/08*273 686 65 0*281 676 70 0*290 665 75 0*301 650 85 0
*** *** ** *** *** **** *** **** *** **
16810 10/09E290 650 80 0E300 640 80 0E310 630 85 0E320 613 85 0
16810 10/09*308 637 95 0*317 621 105 0*323 605 105 0*329 575 105 0
**** *** ** **** *** *** **** *** *** **** *** ***
16815 10/10E330 593 85 0E340 571 85 0E350 550 85 0E363 528 85 0
16815 10/10*333 548 105 0*340 522 100 0*350 500 95 0*363 486 90 0
**** *** *** * *** *** * *** *** * *** **
16820 10/11E379 502 85 0E396 479 85 0E410 460 75 0E421 450 65 0
16820 10/11*379 479 85 0E396 471 80 0E410 460 80 0E429 448 80 945
* *** *** ** ** *** *** ** ***
16825 10/12E431 448 55 0E442 449 50 0E455 452 45 0E467 458 40 0
16825 10/12E452 450 75 0E470 460 70 0E490 475 65 0E501 484 55 0
*** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** ** *** *** **
16830 10/13E480 464 40 0E493 478 35 0E508 498 35 0E523 512 35 0
16830 10/13E510 492 45 0E521 501 35 0E530 510 35 0E540 521 35 0
*** *** ** *** *** *** *** *** ***
16835 HR
The only major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997) are to retain the 1st
and 2nd as a tropical depression rather than eliminating it from the best
track and to delay the extratropical stage until the 11th. Partagas and
Diaz otherwise made reasonable small alterations to the track and intensity
shown in Neumann et al. (1999). A peripheral pressure of 1004 mb (12Z on
the 4th) suggests winds of at least 39 kt - 45 kt chosen for best track.
A possible central pressure of 945 mb (20Z on the 11th) suggests winds of
100 kt from the northern wind-pressure relationship - 80 kt chosen for best
track since the hurricane had already transitioned to an extratropical storm.
However, because of the very low pressures encountered, it is likely that it
retained tropical characteristics close to the observation date. It is
concluded that this hurricane reached Category 3 hurricane status (105 kt)
before becoming extratropical. Winds are adjusted accordingly on the 8th
through the 13th.
********************************************************************************
1905/05
16840 10/05/1905 M= 6 5 SNBR= 392 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
16840 10/05/1905 M= 7 5 SNBR= 414 NOT NAMED XING=1 SSS=0
* ***
16845 10/05* 0 0 0 0*230 889 35 0*230 895 35 0*230 899 35 0
16845 10/05* 0 0 0 0*230 889 35 0*230 895 40 0*230 899 40 0
** **
16850 10/06*231 904 35 0*233 908 35 0*236 911 35 0*240 916 35 0
16850 10/06*231 904 40 0*233 908 40 0*236 911 40 0*240 916 40 0
** ** ** **
16855 10/07*244 920 35 0*249 924 35 0*252 926 35 0*256 928 40 0
16855 10/07*244 920 40 0*249 924 40 0*252 926 40 0*256 927 40 0
** ** ** ***
16860 10/08*258 929 45 0*260 930 45 0*263 930 45 0*267 931 45 0
16860 10/08*258 927 45 0*260 926 45 0*263 925 45 0*267 924 45 0
*** *** *** ***
16865 10/09*273 930 45 0*280 927 45 0*287 920 40 0*296 913 35 0
16865 10/09*273 923 45 0*280 922 45 0*287 920 45 0*296 913 40 0
*** *** ** **
16870 10/10*307 905 35 0*320 898 30 0*335 887 25 0* 0 0 0 0
16870 10/10*307 905 35 0E320 898 30 0E335 887 25 0E347 865 25 0
* * **** *** **
(The 11th is new to HURDAT.)
16872 10/11E356 843 25 0E364 824 25 0E373 800 25 0E385 777 25 0
16875 TS
No major changes from Partagas and Diaz (1997), who made large alterations to
the track and intensity shown in Neumann et al. (1999). These track and
intensity changes are found to be reasonable. A peripheral pressure of
1003 mb (12Z on the 5th) suggests winds of at least 39 kt from the Gulf of
Mexico wind-pressure relationship - 40 kt chosen for best track.
********************************************************************************
1905 - Additional Notes:
Partagas and Diaz (1997) mentioned four additional systems considered
for inclusion into HURDAT. The re-analysis team agreed to leave them out
of HURDAT for the following reasons:
1) August 18-20, 1905: Not enough evidence for tropical storm intensity.
2) August 27-30, 1905: Gale force intensity, but likely extratropical.
3) September 27, 1905: Gale to hurricane force observations found, but
likely was an extratropical storm.
4) November 28-December 3, 1905: Gale force intensity, but likely
extratropical.
********************************************************************************