Subject: Re: questions for presenters...continued
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 14:33:29 -0400
From: "Richard J Pasch" <Richard.J.Pasch@noaa.gov>
To: James Franklin <James.Franklin@noaa.gov>
CC: "James M. Gross" <James.M.Gross@noaa.gov>,
     Colin McAdie <Colin.J.McAdie@noaa.gov>,
     Ed Rappaport <Edward.N.Rappaport@noaa.gov>,
     John L Beven <John.L.Beven@noaa.gov>,
     "Brian.R.Jarvinen" <Brian.R.Jarvinen@noaa.gov>,
     Chris Landsea <Chris.Landsea@noaa.gov>,
     Mark Powell <Mark.Powell@noaa.gov>,
     Peter Black <Peter.Black@noaa.gov>

James,

Sorry, I also meant to apply the 80% to all flight levels for Andrew, although for
its stronger stages, I'm sure the flight level was nearly always 700 mb.

Richard

James Franklin wrote:

> Jim, Richard:
>
> If you can tell me what particular reduction factor you would like me to
> apply, I will make the diagram using it.  Let me know, do you want 80%, 85%,
> 82.5%, or what?
>
> At the time of Andrew, I believe a single reduction factor was applied to
> recon data at any altitude.  Is this what you would like me to do as well?
>
> James
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> James L. Franklin
>
> Hurricane Specialist
> National Hurricane Center