Effects of Synoptic Surveillance on model forecasts for
13 September 2004 0000 UTC
Ivan.


Quicktime movie of AVN DLM wind model forecast
Quicktime movie of DLM wind data increment


TRACK AND INTENSITY PERFORMANCE

TRACK (km)
MODEL12 h24 h36 h48 h60 h72 h84 h96 h108 h120 h
AVNN 33 44 60 24 45116173269283386
AVNO 24 73102 78 45 98135215186223
%IMP27%-66%-70%-225% 0%16%22%20%34%42%
GFNO 47 80108113119 97 96143248388
GFDL 43 94117110 97 69 35 67115232
%IMP 9%-18%-8% 3%18%29%74%53%54%40%
INTENSITY (kt)
MODEL12 h24 h36 h48 h60 h72 h84 h96 h108 h120 h
AVNN-65-64-55-38-34-32 7 13 3 -1
AVNO-69-62-45-39-34-34 -9 -1 -2 -4
%IMP-6% 3%18%-3% 0%-6%-29%92%33%-300%
GFNO-25-17 -7 -6 -6 -9 24 24 16 19
GFDL -7 -7 0-12 -7 -8 16 12 17 16
%IMP72%79%100%-200%-17%11%33%50%-6%16%

Landfall forecasts

14/0100 UTC 21.7N 85.2W 15 n mi SW of Cabo San Antonio, Cuba 25.0 h into the forecast
MODELLATLONTIMEERRORLOCATION
AVNN 21.8585.00 23.0 26.5Near La Fe, Pinar del Rio, Cuba
AVNO21.7185.16 21.0 4.3La Fe, Pinar del Rio, Cuba
%IMP-100% 84%
GFNO21.8486.31 29.0115.6Offshore La Fe, Pinar del Rio, Cuba
GFDL21.4585.40 19.5 34.6Near La Fe, Pinar del Rio, Cuba
%IMP -63% 70%
16/0650 UTC 30.2N 87.9W Near Pine Beach, AL 79.0 h into the forecast
MODELLATLONTIMEERRORLOCATION
AVNN30.4286.60 87.0127.1Fort Walton Beach, FL
AVNO30.4286.68 80.0119.5Fort Walton Beach, FL
%IMP 87% 63%
GFNO28.9989.19 72.5183.3South Pass, LA
GFDL30.2788.20 76.0 29.8Dauphin Island, AL
%IMP 54% 84%

Figure 1. NCEP 850 - 200 hPa mean wind analysis for 13 September 2004 0000 UTC (Hurricane Ivan).

Figure 2. Track forecasts for the no dropwindsonde (NO or NN) and the all dropwindsonde (AL) runs for the AVN and GFDL models initialized on 13 September 2004 0000 UTC.

Figure 3. NCEP Global Ensemble Predction System track forecasts for all cyclones in the Atlantic basin initialized from 11 September 2004 0600 UTC to 12 September 2004 0000 UTC, showing the tracks of Hurricane Ivan.

Figure 4. Ensemble perturbation variance at the nominal sampling time 13 September 2004 0000 UTC from the previous day NCEP ensemble forecast. The green circles represent the dropwindsonde locations.

Figure 5. Variance explained within the verification region (large red circle) for observations taken at the sampling time 13 September 2004 0000 UTC from the Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter run from the previous day NCEP ensemble forecast. The green circles represent the dropwindsonde locations.

Figure 6. Initial condition differences in the 850 - 200 hPa mean wind between the no and all dropwindsonde cases for 13 September 2004 0000 UTC. The circles represent the dropwindsonde locations.

Figure 7. 24-h forecast differences in the 850 - 200 hPa mean wind between the no and all dropwindsonde cases for 13 September 2004 0000 UTC.