Effects of Synoptic Surveillance on model forecasts for
17 July 2005 1800 UTC
Emily.


Quicktime movie of AVN DLM wind model forecast
Quicktime movie of DLM wind data increment


TRACK AND INTENSITY PERFORMANCE

TRACK (km)
MODEL12 h24 h36 h48 h60 h72 h84 h96 h108 h120 h
AVNN 94105158129178198
AVNO100 83 84 45121245
%IMP-6%21%47%65%32%-24%
GFNO 43 30 42 78124254
GFDL 53 73127153217393
%IMP-23%-143%-202%-96%-75%-55%
INTENSITY (kt)
MODEL12 h24 h36 h48 h60 h72 h84 h96 h108 h120 h
AVNN-82-30-50-50-79-37
AVNO-68-13-34-26-57-55
%IMP17%57%32%48%28%-49%
GFNO-11 17 11 20-16-27
GFDL-12 29 14 17-47-31
%IMP-9%-71%-27%15%-194%-15%

Landfall forecasts

18/0630 UTC 20.3N 87.4W Near Tulum, Mexico, 12.5 h into the forecast
MODELLATLONTIMEERRORLOCATION
AVNN 19.9487.46 9.5 40.7Zamach, Qintana Roo, Mexico
AVNO20.3086.91 8.0 51.1Cozumel, Qintana Roo, Mexico
%IMP -50% -26%
GFNO20.2887.45 11.0 5.7Tulum, Qintana Roo, Mexico
GFDL20.2087.39 10.5 11.2Tulum, Qintana Roo, Mexico
%IMP -33% -96%
20/1200 UTC 24.8N 97.6W Near San Fernando, Mexico, 66.0 h into the forecast
MODELLATLONTIMEERRORLOCATION
AVNN 23.0597.74 68.0194.9Rancho de Piedra, Tamaulipas, Mexico
AVNO24.0097.78 59.5 90.7Las Guayabas, Tamaulipas, Mexico
%IMP-225% 53%
GFNO24.1097.71 58.5 78.6Las Mujeres, Tamaulipas, Mexico
GFDL23.7097.79 55.0123.7Morales, Tamaulipas, Mexico
%IMP -29% -57%

Figure 1. NCEP 850 - 200 hPa mean wind analysis for 17 July 2005 1800 UTC (Hurricane Emily).

Figure 2. Track forecasts for the no dropwindsonde (NO or NN) and the all dropwindsonde (AL) runs for the AVN and GFDL models initialized on 17 July 2005 1800 UTC.

Figure 3. Initial condition differences in the 850 - 200 hPa mean wind between the no and all dropwindsonde cases for 17 July 2005 1800 UTC.

Figure 4. 12-h forecast differences in the 850 - 200 hPa mean wind between the no and all dropwindsonde cases for 17 July 2005 1800 UTC.