Effects of Synoptic Surveillance on model forecasts for
17 July 2005 1200 UTC
Emily.


Quicktime movie of AVN DLM wind model forecast
Quicktime movie of DLM wind data increment


TRACK AND INTENSITY PERFORMANCE

TRACK (km)
MODEL12 h24 h36 h48 h60 h72 h84 h96 h108 h120 h
AVNN126205253218175206302428
AVNO 57 94118 55 60152260420
%IMP55%54%53%75%66%26%14% 2%
GFNO 53 76 63 75 91163274
GFDL 53100112134158314465
%IMP 0%-32%-78%-79%-74%-93%-70%
INTENSITY (kt)
MODEL12 h24 h36 h48 h60 h72 h84 h96 h108 h120 h
AVNN-81-29-41-48-79-79-32-10
AVNO-68 -7-21-22-58-72-28-14
%IMP16%76%49%54%29% 9%12%-12%
GFNO 4 17 19 12-12-62 -2
GFDL -1 2 11 5-19-76-11
%IMP75%88%42%58%-58%-23%-450%

Landfall forecasts

18/0630 UTC 20.3N 87.4W Near Tulum, Mexico, 18.5 h into the forecast
MODELLATLONTIMEERRORLOCATION
AVNN 19.5887.50 13.5 80.7Santa Rosa, Qintana Roo, Mexico
AVNO20.2587.50 16.0 11.8Tulum, Qintana Roo, Mexico
%IMP 50% 85%
GFNO20.0087.43 16.0 33.5Boca Paila, Qintana Roo, Mexico
GFDL19.8087.53 16.5 57.2Vigia Chico, Qintana Roo, Mexico
%IMP 20% -71%
20/1200 UTC 24.8N 97.6W Near San Fernando, Mexico, 72.0 h into the forecast
MODELLATLONTIMEERRORLOCATION
AVNN 23.0597.73 69.5194.9Rancho de Piedra, Tamaulipas, Mexico
AVNO25.3897.51 66.5 65.1Isla Larga, Tamaulipas, Mexico
%IMP-120% 67%
GFNO24.5597.79 64.5 33.8Punto de Piedra, Tamaulipas, Mexico
GFDL24.0197.71 60.5 88.5Las Guayabas, Tamaulipas, Mexico
%IMP -53%-162%

Figure 1. NCEP 850 - 200 hPa mean wind analysis for 17 July 2005 1200 UTC (Hurricane Emily).

Figure 2. Track forecasts for the no dropwindsonde (NO or NN) and the all dropwindsonde (AL) runs for the AVN and GFDL models initialized on 17 July 2005 1200 UTC.

Figure 3. Initial condition differences in the 850 - 200 hPa mean wind between the no and all dropwindsonde cases for 17 July 2005 1200 UTC.

Figure 4. 12-h forecast differences in the 850 - 200 hPa mean wind between the no and all dropwindsonde cases for 17 July 2005 1200 UTC.