Effects of Synoptic Surveillance on model forecasts for
17 July 2005 0600 UTC
Emily.


Quicktime movie of AVN DLM wind model forecast
Quicktime movie of DLM wind data increment


TRACK AND INTENSITY PERFORMANCE

TRACK (km)
MODEL12 h24 h36 h48 h60 h72 h84 h96 h108 h120 h
AVNN114162175222176142165
AVNO 57 46 72 79123102332
%IMP50%72%59%64%30%28%-101%
GFNO 35 39 11 33 55 97141322
GFDL 15 33 45 84111203433690
%IMP57%15%-309%-155%-102%-109%-207%-114%
INTENSITY (kt)
MODEL12 h24 h36 h48 h60 h72 h84 h96 h108 h120 h
AVNN-87-79-30-49-51-80-53
AVNO-67-69-10-29-23-54-49
%IMP23%13%67%41%55%32% 8%
GFNO -3 0 24 17 19-13-26 3
GFDL-11 -5 20 10 13-36-29 -5
%IMP-267%und%17%41%32%-177%-12%-67%

Landfall forecasts

18/0630 UTC 20.3N 87.4W Near Tulum, Mexico, 24.5 h into the forecast
MODELLATLONTIMEERRORLOCATION
AVNN 20.2587.32 19.0 10.0Tulsayab, Qintana Roo, Mexico
AVNO20.5787.14 23.0 40.4Playa del Carmen, Qintana Roo, Mexico
%IMP 73%-304%
GFNO20.4887.24 23.0 26.0Playa del Carmen, Qintana Roo, Mexico
GFDL20.1487.47 23.5 19.2Tulum, Qintana Roo, Mexico
%IMP 33% 26%
20/1200 UTC 24.8N 97.6W Near San Fernando, Mexico, 78.0 h into the forecast
MODELLATLONTIMEERRORLOCATION
AVNN 23.6697.77 71.0127.8Morales, Tamaulipas, Mexico
AVNO23.8097.73 74.0111.9La Pesca, Tamaulipas, Mexico
%IMP 43% 12%
GFNO24.8897.62 71.0 9.1El Mezquital, Tamaulipas, Mexico
GFDL23.8397.73 68.0108.6La Pesca, Tamaulipas, Mexico
%IMP 43%-1093%

Figure 1. NCEP 850 - 200 hPa mean wind analysis for 17 July 2005 0600 UTC (Hurricane Emily).

Figure 2. Track forecasts for the no dropwindsonde (NO or NN) and the all dropwindsonde (AL) runs for the AVN and GFDL models initialized on 17 July 2005 0600 UTC.

Figure 3. Initial condition differences in the 850 - 200 hPa mean wind between the no and all dropwindsonde cases for 17 July 2005 0600 UTC.

Figure 4. 12-h forecast differences in the 850 - 200 hPa mean wind between the no and all dropwindsonde cases for 17 July 2005 0600 UTC.