Effects of Synoptic Surveillance on model forecasts for
10 June 2005 0600 UTC
Arlene.


Quicktime movie of AVN DLM wind model forecast
Quicktime movie of DLM wind data increment


TRACK AND INTENSITY PERFORMANCE

TRACK (km)
MODEL12 h24 h36 h48 h60 h72 h84 h96 h108 h120 h
AVNN 116158185240411520411
AVNO101 78 562065608991097
%IMP13%51%70%14%-36%-73%-167%
GFNO123136156223269242 88111
GFDL 67 45 86135151131140155
%IMP46%67%45%39%44%46%-59%-40%
INTENSITY (kt)
MODEL12 h24 h36 h48 h60 h72 h84 h96 h108 h120 h
AVNN-23-33-28 -6-11-11-12
AVNO-23-30-28-13 -9 -9-12
%IMP 0% 9% 6%-117%18%18% 0%
GFNO-18-16-11 0 3 3 21 45
GFDL -3-16-13 -1 -1 -3 24 27
%IMP83% 0%-18%und%67% 0%14%40%

Landfall forecasts

10/0800 UTC 21.8N 84.5W Near Cabo Corrientes, western Cuba 2.0 h into the forecast
MODELLATLONTIMEERRORLOCATION
AVNN 21.9284.72 2.0 26.3Near La Fe, Pinar del Rio, Cuba
AVNONo landfall forecast
%IMP
GFNO22.0484.37 4.5 29.8La Fe, Pinar del Rio, Cuba
GFDL22.4384.34 4.5 71.9La Fe, Pinar del Rio, Cuba
%IMP 0%-141%
11/1900 UTC 30.3N 87.5W Near and just west of Pensacola 37.0 h into the forecast
MODELLATLONTIMEERRORLOCATION
AVNN 29.7788.86 42.0143.4Chandeleur Islands, LA
AVNO30.2487.88 40.0 37.1Gulf Shores, AL
%IMP 60% 74%
GFNO30.0889.20 40.0165.1Gulfside, MS
GFDL30.3888.57 37.5103.0Pascagoula, MS
%IMP 83% 38%

Figure 1. NCEP 850 - 200 hPa mean wind analysis for 10 June 2005 0600 UTC (Tropical Storm Arlene).

Figure 2. Track forecasts for the no dropwindsonde (NO or NN) and the all dropwindsonde (AL) runs for the AVN and GFDL models initialized on 10 June 2005 0600 UTC.

Figure 3. Initial condition differences in the 850 - 200 hPa mean wind between the no and all dropwindsonde cases for 10 June 2005 0600 UTC.

Figure 4. 12-h forecast differences in the 850 - 200 hPa mean wind between the no and all dropwindsonde cases for 10 June 2005 0600 UTC.